Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Papila, R. Haftka (2000)
Response surfaces for optimal weight of cracked composite panels - Noise and accuracy
R. Merton (1976)
Option pricing when underlying stock returns are discontinuousJournal of Financial Economics, 3
Atidel Hadj-Alouane, J. Bean (1997)
A Genetic Algorithm for the Multiple-Choice Integer ProgramOper. Res., 45
Nhu-Van Nguyen, Seok-Min Choi, Wan-Sub Kim, Jae-Woo Lee, Sangho Kim, D. Neufeld, Y. Byun (2013)
Multidisciplinary Unmanned Combat Air Vehicle system design using Multi-Fidelity ModelAerospace Science and Technology, 26
K. Jackson, S. Jaimungal, V. Surkov (2007)
Fourier Space Time-Stepping for Option Pricing With Levy ModelsDerivatives
D. Huang, T. Allen (2005)
Design and analysis of variable fidelity experimentation applied to engine valve heat treatment process designJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 54
W. McDaniel, Bruce Ankenman (2000)
A RESPONSE SURFACE TEST BEDQuality and Reliability Engineering International, 16
N. Chantarat (2003)
Modern design of experiments methods for screening and experimentations with mixture and qualitative variables
Yansheng Ma, Yong Li (2012)
A uniform asymptotic expansion for stochastic volatility model in pricing multi-asset European optionsApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 28
W. DuMouchel, B. Jones (1994)
A simple Bayesian modification of D-optimal designs to reduce dependence on an assumed modelTechnometrics, 36
T. Allen, Liyang Yu, J. Schmitz (2003)
An experimental design criterion for minimizing meta‐model prediction errors applied to die casting process designJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 52
A. Possolo (2013)
Five examples of assessment and expression of measurement uncertaintyApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 29
Ethem Çanakoglu, S. Özekici (2011)
Portfolio selection with imperfect information: A hidden Markov modelApplied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 27
Yongquan Zhou, Guo Zhou, Junli Zhang (2013)
A Hybrid Glowworm Swarm Optimization Algorithm for Constrained Engineering Design ProblemsApplied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 7
F. Black, Myron Scholes (1973)
The Pricing of Options and Corporate LiabilitiesJournal of Political Economy, 81
R. Wasserstein (1997)
Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and ApplicationsTechnometrics, 39
Michael Dueker (1997)
Markov Switching in GARCH Processes and Mean-Reverting Stock-Market VolatilityJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 15
T. Allen, L. Yu, Mikhail Bernshteyn (2000)
LOW-COST RESPONSE SURFACE METHODS APPLIED TO THE DESIGN OF PLASTIC FASTENERSQuality Engineering, 12
C. Wu, Yuan Ding (1998)
Construction of response surface designs for qualitative and quantitative factorsJournal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 71
(1989)
Response surface methodology: 19661988
L. Huang, Z. Gao, Dehu Zhang (2013)
Research on multi-fidelity aerodynamic optimization methodsChinese Journal of Aeronautics, 26
N. Draper, J. John (1988)
Response-surface designs for quantitative and qualitative variablesTechnometrics, 30
Zhonghua Han, S. Görtz, R. Hain (2010)
A Variable-Fidelity Modeling Method for Aero-Loads Prediction
M. Koç, T. Allen, Suwat Jiratheranat, T. Altan (2000)
The use of FEA and design of experiments to establish design guidelines for simple hydroformed partsInternational Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 40
T. Bollerslev (1986)
Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticityJournal of Econometrics, 31
G. Box, N. Draper (1959)
A Basis for the Selection of a Response Surface DesignJournal of the American Statistical Association, 54
T. Allen, Shih-Hsien Tseng (2011)
Variance plus bias optimal response surface designs with qualitative factors applied to stem choice modelingQuality and Reliability Engineering International, 27
J. Rodríguez, V. Pérez, D. Padmanabhan, J. Renaud (2000)
Sequential approximate optimization using variable fidelity response surface approximationsStructural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 22
In practical applications, information about the accuracy or ‘fidelity’ of alternative surrogate systems may be ambiguous and difficult to determine. To address this problem, we propose to treat surrogate system fidelity level as a categorical factor in optimal response surface design. To design the associated experiments, we apply the Expected Integrated Mean Squared Error optimal design criterion, which takes into account both variance and bias errors. The performance of the proposed design was compared using three test cases to four types of alternatives using the Empirical Integrated Squared Error. Because of its ability to foster relatively accurate predictions, the proposed design is recommended in fidelity experimental design, particularly when the experimenters lack sufficient information about the fidelity levels of surrogate systems. The method was applied to the case of intraday trading optimization in which data were collected from the Taiwan Futures Exchange. We also calculated the implied volatility from the Merton's Jump‐diffusion model via the fast Fourier transform algorithm with three different models of varying fidelity levels. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry – Wiley
Published: Sep 1, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.