Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Zade, Sebastian Lumpp, P. Tzscheutschler, U. Wagner (2022)
Satisfying user preferences in community-based local energy markets — Auction-based clearing approachesApplied Energy
G. Ye, G. Li, D. Wu, X. Chen, Y. Zhou (2017)
Towards cost minimization with renewable energy sharing in cooperative residential communities, 5
M. Khorasany, Amin Gazafroudi, R. Razzaghi, Thomas Morstyn, M. Shafie‐khah (2022)
A framework for participation of prosumers in peer-to-peer energy trading and flexibility marketsApplied Energy
M.F. Zia, M. Benbouzid, E. Elbouchikhi, S. Muyeen, K. Techato, J.M. Guerrero (2020)
Microgrid transactive energy: Review, architectures, distributed ledger technologies, and market analysis, 8
Zhang Y. (2013)
10.1109/GlobalSIP.2013.6737021
F. Moret, P. Pinson (2018)
Energy collectives: A community and fairness based approach to future electricity markets, 34
M. Khorasany, Afshin Najafi-Ghalelou, R. Razzaghi (2020)
A Framework for Joint Scheduling and Power Trading of Prosumers in Transactive MarketsIEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 12
Xiong Wu, Xiuli Wang, Wei Zhang, Yongxi Huang (2019)
LEM for DERs and flexible loadsIET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
Carlos Sabillon, A. Mohamed, Ali Golriz, B. Venkatesh (2021)
Comprehensive platform for distribution transactive energy marketsIET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
A. Wazir, Naeem Arbab (2016)
Analysis and Optimization of IEEE 33 Bus Radial Distributed System Using Optimization Algorithm
U. Amin, Md. Hossain, W. Tushar, K. Mahmud (2020)
Energy Trading in Local Electricity Market With Renewables—A Contract Theoretic ApproachIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 17
(2018)
A technical approach to p2p energy transactions in microgrids
Xiaolong Jin, Qiuwei Wu, H. Jia (2020)
Local flexibility markets: Literature review on concepts, models and clearing methodsApplied Energy
C.P. Mediwaththe, E.R. Stephens, D.B. Smith, A. Mahanti (2017)
Competitive energy trading framework for demand‐side management in neighborhood area networks, 9
W. Tushar, B. Chai, C. Yuen, S. Huang, D.B. Smith, H.V. Poor (2016)
Energy storage sharing in smart grid: A modified auction‐based approach, 7
F. Lezama, J. Soares, P. Hernandez‐Leal, M. Kaisers, T. Pinto, Z. Vale (2018)
Local energy markets: Paving the path toward fully transactive energy systems, 34
Yunpeng Xiao, Xifan Wang, P. Pinson, Xiuli Wang (2018)
A Local Energy Market for Electricity and HydrogenIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 33
Y. Okawa, T. Namerikawa (2017)
Distributed optimal power management via negawatt trading in real‐time electricity market, 8
Wei Wei, Feng Liu, S. Mei (2015)
Energy Pricing and Dispatch for Smart Grid Retailers Under Demand Response and Market Price UncertaintyIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 6
M. Nizami, Md. Hossain, B. Amin, Edstan Fernandez (2020)
A residential energy management system with bi-level optimization-based bidding strategy for day-ahead bi-directional electricity tradingApplied Energy, 261
T. Capper, A. Gorbatcheva, Mustafa Mustafa, M. Bahloul, J. Schwidtal, R. Chitchyan, M. Andoni, V. Robu, M. Montakhabi, I. Scott, C. Francis, T. Mbavarira, J. Espana, Lynne Kiesling (2022)
Peer-to-peer, community self-consumption, and transactive energy: A systematic literature review of local energy market modelsRenewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
R. Zamani, M. Moghaddam, M. Haghifam (2022)
Evaluating the Impact of Connectivity on Transactive Energy in Smart GridIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 13
B. Cornélusse, Iacopo Savelli, S. Paoletti, Antonio Giannitrapani, A. Vicino (2018)
A Community Microgrid Architecture with an Internal Local MarketArXiv, abs/1810.09803
M. Akter, Apel Mahmud, E. Haque, A. Oo (2020)
Transactive energy coordination mechanism for community microgrids supplying multi‐dwelling residential apartmentsIET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
M. Khorasany, R. Razzaghi, Amin Gazafroudi (2021)
Two-stage mechanism design for energy trading of strategic agents in energy communitiesApplied Energy, 295
N. Liu, X. Yu, W. Fan, C. Hu, T. Rui, Q. Chen (2017)
Online energy sharing for nanogrid clusters: A Lyapunov optimization approach, 9
Yu Zhang, G. Giannakis (2015)
Distributed Stochastic Market Clearing With High-Penetration Wind PowerIEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 31
R. Zamani, M. Parsa‐Moghaddam, M.R. Haghifam (2022)
Dynamic characteristics preserving data compressing algorithm for transactive energy management frameworks, 18
S. Bahramara, M. Moghaddam, M. Haghifam (2015)
Modelling hierarchical decision making framework for operation of active distribution gridsIet Generation Transmission & Distribution, 9
M. Khorasany, Yateendra Mishra, G. Ledwich (2018)
Market framework for local energy trading: a review of potential designs and market clearing approachesIET Generation, Transmission & Distribution
E. Münsing, J. Mather, S. Moura (2017)
2017 IEEE conference on control technology and applications (CCTA)
Inês Reis, Ivo Gonçalves, M. Lopes, C. Antunes (2021)
Towards inclusive community-based energy markets: A multiagent frameworkApplied Energy
F. Teotia, Parul Mathuria, R. Bhakar (2020)
Peer‐to‐peer local electricity market platform pricing strategies for prosumersIet Generation Transmission & Distribution, 14
Y. Zhang, N. Gatsis, G.B. Giannakis (2013)
2013 IEEE Global Conference on Signal and Information Processing
M. Nizami, Md. Hossain, Edstan Fernandez (2020)
Multiagent-Based Transactive Energy Management Systems for Residential Buildings With Distributed Energy ResourcesIEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 16
Growing penetration of distributed energy resources (DER) leads to emerging changes and issues in future power systems. A system oprator aims to maximise demnad side energy trading while minimising energy improts from upstream grid. This paper proposes a reliable local energy market (LEM) trading mechanism in which consumers and prosumers can trade self‐produced energy in a multiple community‐based market (MCBM) framework to optimally provide the balance. The proposed framework intends to maximise social welfare by fair allocation of resources, increasing the provided reserve for the main grid, and shaving the peak power resulting in enhancement of network flexibility. The overall model is formulated in the style of a bi‐level problem in which the lower‐level clears the market and the upper‐level is designated to redistribute the costs and benefits among market participants. Furthemore, the conditional value at risk (CVaR) approach is employed to evaluate how risk affects social welfare. Moreover, the impact of multiple communities and joint energy trading on the outcomes of the market is examined. The proposed model has been evaluated by analysing IEEE 33‐bus standard test system, and numerical studies verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
IET Generation Transmission & Distribution – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2023
Keywords: power markets; distributed power generation
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.