Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
K. Lange, J. Westlake, M. Spence (1976)
Extensions to pedigree analysis III. Variance components by the scoring methodAnnals of Human Genetics, 39
(2000)
Multivariate QTL anal
C. Amos (1994)
Robust variance-components approach for assessing genetic linkage in pedigrees.American journal of human genetics, 54 3
C. Dolan, D. Boomsma, M. Neale (1999)
A Note on the Power Provided by Sibships of Sizes 2, 3, and 4 in Genetic Covariance Modeling of a Codominant QTLBehavior Genetics, 29
(1993)
Extended multipoint identity-by-descent
Pak Sham, S. Cherny, Shaun Purcell, John Hewitt (2000)
Power of linkage versus association analysis of quantitative traits, by use of variance-components models, for sibship data.American journal of human genetics, 66 5
N. Schork (1993)
Extended multipoint identity-by-descent analysis of human quantitative traits: efficiency, power, and modeling considerations.American journal of human genetics, 53 6
J. Hopper, J. Mathews (1982)
Extensions to multivariate normal models for pedigree analysisAnnals of Human Genetics, 46
K. Lange, R. Elston (1975)
Extensions to Pedigree AnalysisHuman Heredity, 25
(1994)
Robust variance-components approach
S. Jain (1975)
GENETIC STRUCTURE OF POPULATIONS.Evolution; international journal of organic evolution, 29 2
G. Zhu, D. Duffy, A. Eldridge, M. Grace, C. Mayne, Louise O’gorman, Joanne Aitken, M. Neale, Nicholas Hayward, Adèle Green, Nick Martin (1999)
A major quantitative-trait locus for mole density is linked to the familial melanoma gene CDKN2A: a maximum-likelihood combined linkage and association analysis in twins and their sibs.American journal of human genetics, 65 2
D. Boomsma, C. Dolan (1999)
Multivariate QTL analysis using structural equation modeling: A look at power under simple conditions
Jeff Williams, J. Blangero (1999)
Power of variance component linkage analysis to detect quantitative trait lociAnnals of Human Genetics, 63
D. I. Boomsma, C. V. Dolan (2000)
Advances in twin and sib‐pair analysis
Williams & Blangero (1999) derived closed form expressions for the power of a univariate variance components test of linkage for a variety of pedigree structures. We have extended their results by investigating the effect of including monozygotic twins in the design on the power to detect linkage. Specifically, we determined the power associated with a pedigree of size three, where individuals one and two were monozygotic twins and individual three was a full sibling to the twins. The power of this sampling unit was uniformly greater than the power obtained from a sib‐pair under the same genetic model. The reason for this was that addition of a second monozygotic twin provided another estimate of the sibling correlation for the particular IBD class. In addition, when the total heritability of the trait was <50%, the number of individuals that needed to be phenotyped was less than that with sib‐pairs alone. However, a pedigree consisting of a monozygotic pair and sibling was never as informative as a sib‐trio, presumably because the sib‐trio provided information about allele sharing between three individuals, whereas the monozygotic twins and sibling unit only provided one such relationship. We conclude that including a monozygotic twin in the analysis is an economical strategy, since only one twin needs to be genotyped.
Annals of Human Genetics – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2003
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.