Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
T. New (1997)
Are Lepidoptera an effective ‘umbrella group‘ for biodiversity conservation?Journal of Insect Conservation, 1
J. Lawler, D. White, J. Sifneos, L. Master (2003)
Rare Species and the Use of Indicator Groups for Conservation PlanningConservation Biology, 17
Gerold Kier, W. Barthlott (2001)
Measuring and mapping endemism and species richness: a new methodological approach and its application on the flora of AfricaBiodiversity & Conservation, 10
R. Cowie, A. Robinson (2003)
The decline of native Pacific island faunas: changes in status of the land snails of Samoa through the 20th centuryBiological Conservation, 110
A. Filipe, T. Marques, P. Tiago, F. Ribeiro, L. Costa, I. Cowx, M. COLLARES-PEREIRA (2004)
Selection of Priority Areas for Fish Conservation in Guadiana River Basin, Iberian PeninsulaConservation Biology, 18
Fowles Fowles, Alexander Alexander, Key Key (1999)
The saproxylic quality indexColeopterist, 8
A. Purvis, J. Gittleman, G. Cowlishaw, G. Mace (2000)
Predicting extinction risk in declining speciesProceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 267
S. Laffan, M. Crisp (2003)
Assessing endemism at multiple spatial scales, with an example from the Australian vascular floraJournal of Biogeography, 30
(2004)
Measuring biological diversity. Oxford
S. Fattorini (2002)
Biogeography of the tenebrionid beetles (Coleoptera, Tenebrionidae) on the Aegean Islands (Greece)Journal of Biogeography, 29
D. Maes, H. Dyck (2001)
Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium): Europe's worst case scenario?Biological Conservation, 99
J. Majer, G. Beeston (1996)
The Biodiversity Integrity Index: An Illustration Using Ants in Western AustraliaConservation Biology, 10
J.A Cook, S. MacDonald (2001)
Should endemism be a focus of conservation efforts along the North Pacific Coast of North AmericaBiological Conservation, 97
(2003)
Arguments for rejecting the sequential
H. Akçakaya, S. Ferson, M. Burgman, D. Keith, G. Mace, C. Todd (2000)
Making Consistent IUCN Classifications under UncertaintyConservation Biology, 14
Hobohm Hobohm (2003)
Characterization and ranking of biodiversity hotspotsBiodivers. Conserv., 12
(2003)
Bonferroni in ecological studies
P. Williams, D. Gibbons, C. Margules, A. Rebelo, C. Humphries, R. Pressey (1996)
A Comparison of Richness Hotspots, Rarity Hotspots, and Complementary Areas for Conserving Diversity of British BirdsConservation Biology, 10
C. Swaay, M. Warren (1999)
Red data book of European butterflies [Rhopalocera]
(2001)
IUCN red list categories and criteria: version 3.1. IUCN Species Survival Commission
N. Myers, R. Mittermeier, C. Mittermeier, G. Fonseca, J. Kent (2000)
Biodiversity hotspots for conservation prioritiesNature, 403
C. Thomas, S. Glen, O. Lewis, J. Hill, D. Blakeley (1999)
Population differentiation and conservation of endemic races: the butterfly, Plebejus argusAnimal Conservation, 2
(1994)
IUCN red list categories
Maes Maes, Dyck Dyck (2001)
Butterfly diversity loss in Flanders (north Belgium)Biol. Conserv., 99
Thomas Thomas, Glen Glen, Lewis Lewis, Hill Hill, Blakeley Blakeley (1999)
Population differentiation and conservation of endemic racesAnim. Conserv., 2
C. Hilton‐Taylor, C. Pollock, R. Mittermeier, D. Brackett (2000)
2000 IUCN red list of threatened species
Majer Majer, Beeston Beeston (1996)
The biodiversity integrity indexConserv. Biol., 10
M. Araújo (2002)
Biodiversity Hotspots and Zones of Ecological TransitionConservation Biology, 16
A. Grill, D. Cleary (2003)
Diversity patterns in butterfly communities of the Greek nature reserve DadiaBiological Conservation, 114
Myers Myers, Mittermeier Mittermeier (2003)
Impact and acceptance of the hotspots strategyConserv. Biol., 17
(2000)
Human population in the biodiversity
(1996)
The biodiversity integrity
S. Spector (2002)
Biogeographic Crossroads as Priority Areas for Biodiversity ConservationConservation Biology, 16
R. Dennis, T. Shreeve, A. Olivier, J. Coutsis (2000)
Contemporary geography dominates butterfly diversity gradients within the Aegean archipelago (Lepidoptera: Papilionoidea, Hesperioidea)Journal of Biogeography, 27
S. Ferrier, R. Pressey, T. Barrett (2000)
A new predictor of the irreplaceability of areas for achieving a conservation goal, its application to real-world planning, and a research agenda for further refinementBiological Conservation, 93
Ovadia Ovadia (2003)
Ranking hotspots of varying sizesConserv. Biol., 17
A. Dobson, J. Rodríguez, W. Roberts, D. Wilcove (1997)
Geographic Distribution of Endangered Species in the United StatesScience, 275
N. Myers, R. Mittermeier (2003)
Impact and Acceptance of the Hotspots Strategy: Response to Ovadia and to Brummitt and LughadhaConservation Biology, 17
P. Griffin (1999)
Endangered species diversity ‘hot spots’ in Russia and centers of endemismBiodiversity & Conservation, 8
J. Prendergast, Rachel Quinn, John Lawton, B. Eversham, David Gibbons (1993)
Rare species, the coincidence of diversity hotspots and conservation strategiesNature, 365
N. Brummitt, E. Lughadha (2003)
Biodiversity: Where's Hot and Where's NotConservation Biology, 17
M. Pollet (2001)
Dolichopodid Biodiversity and Site Quality Assessment of Reed Marshes And Grasslands in Belgium (Diptera: Dolichopodidae)Journal of Insect Conservation, 5
S. Sfenthourakis, A. Legakis (2001)
Hotspots of endemic terrestrial invertebrates in southern GreeceBiodiversity & Conservation, 10
J. Veech (2000)
Choice of Species‐Area Function Affects Identification of HotspotsConservation Biology, 14
K. McGarigal, S. Stafford, S. Cushman (2000)
Multivariate Statistics for Wildlife and Ecology Research
(2003)
Guidelines for application of IUCN red list criteria at regional levels: version 3.0. IUCN Species Survival Commission
R. Cincotta, J. Wisnewski, R. Engelman (2000)
Human population in the biodiversity hotspotsNature, 404
(1999)
The saproxylic quality index: evaluating wooded habitats for the conservation of dead-wood Coleoptera
(1994)
IUCN red list categories. Prepared by the IUCN Species Survival Commission
C. Swaay, M. Warren (2003)
Prime butterfly areas in Europe : priority sites for conservation
O. Ovadia (2003)
Ranking Hotspots of Varying Sizes: a Lesson from the Nonlinearity of the Species‐Area RelationshipConservation Biology, 17
Kier Kier, Barthlott Barthlott (2001)
Measuring and mapping endemism and species richnessBiodivers. Conserv., 10
Maes Maes, Gilbert Gilbert, Titeux Titeux, Goffart Goffart, Dennis Dennis (2003)
Prediction of butterfly diversity hotspots in BelgiumJ. Biogeogr., 30
J. Kerr (1997)
Species Richness, Endemism, and the Choice of Areas for ConservationConservation Biology, 11
M. Moran (2003)
Arguments for rejecting the sequential Bonferroni in ecological studiesOikos, 100
C. Hobohm (2003)
Characterization and ranking of biodiversity hotspots: centres of species richness and endemismBiodiversity & Conservation, 12
Cowie Cowie, Robinson Robinson (2003)
The decline of native Pacific island faunasBiol. Conserv., 110
Brummitt Brummitt, Nic Lughadha Nic Lughadha (2003)
BiodiversityConserv. Biol., 17
Lazaros Pamperis (1997)
The butterflies of Greece
D. Maes, M. Gilbert, N. Titeux, P. Goffart, R. Dennis (2003)
Prediction of butterfly diversity hotspots in Belgium: a comparison of statistically focused and land use‐focused modelsJournal of Biogeography, 30
K. Root, H. Akçakaya, L. Ginzburg (2003)
A Multispecies Approach to Ecological Valuation and ConservationConservation Biology, 17
Selection of priority areas in conservation biology should incorporate an evaluation of the contribution of imperilled species to the total species richness. To rank areas according to their conservation value, a new index – termed biodiversity conservation concern (BCC) – is proposed. This index combines the conservation status of each species belonging to a given species assemblage with the total species richness. In the BCC index, species are classified into categories of endangerment and weighted by the respective risk of extinction. The new method is applied here to the butterflies of the Aegean Islands (Greece) using different (national and international) red lists. Results were consistent with both classifications based on multivariate analyses and findings from other researches. The BCC index has two important features: it assigns a biodiversity value to an area based on many species, and it facilitates multi‐species assessments of ecological effects.
Animal Conservation – Wiley
Published: Feb 1, 2006
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.