Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
B. Worm, R. Hilborn, J. Baum, T. Branch, J. Collie, C. Costello, M. Fogarty, E. Fulton, J. Hutchings, S. Jennings, O. Jensen, H. Lotze, P. Mace, T. McClanahan, C. Minto, S. Palumbi, A. Parma, D. Ricard, A. Rosenberg, R. Watson, D. Zeller (2009)
Rebuilding Global FisheriesScience, 325
R. Meyer, R. Millar (1999)
BUGS in Bayesian stock assessmentsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 56
M. Maunder (2003)
Is it time to discard the Schaefer model from the stock assessment scientist's toolbox?Fisheries Research, 61
Merrill Rudd, T. Branch (2015)
Does unreported catch lead to overfishingFish and Fisheries, 18
M. Prager (2002)
Comparison of logistic and generalized surplus-production models applied to swordfish, Xiphias gladius, in the north Atlantic OceanFisheries Research, 58
M. Maunder (2001)
A general framework for integrating the standardization of catch per unit of effort into stock assessment modelsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58
A. Punt (2003)
Extending production models to include process error in the population dynamicsCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 60
B.M. Bolker (2008)
Ecological models and data in R
M. Graham (1935)
Modern Theory of Exploiting a Fishery, and Application to North Sea TrawlingIces Journal of Marine Science, 10
J. Thorson, J. Cope, T. Branch, O. Jensen (2012)
Spawning biomass reference points for exploited marine fishes, incorporating taxonomic and body size informationCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 69
D. Fournier, H. Skaug, John Ancheta, J. Ianelli, A. Magnusson, M. Maunder, Anders Nielsen, J. Sibert (2012)
AD Model Builder: using automatic differentiation for statistical inference of highly parameterized complex nonlinear modelsOptimization Methods and Software, 27
M. Chaloupka, G. Balazs (2007)
Using Bayesian state-space modelling to assess the recovery and harvest potential of the Hawaiian green sea turtle stockEcological Modelling, 205
Saang-Yoon Hyun, M. Maunder, B. Rothschild (2015)
Importance of modelling heteroscedasticity of survey index data in fishery stock assessmentsIces Journal of Marine Science, 72
R. Millar, R. Meyer (2000)
Non‐linear state space modelling of fisheries biomass dynamics by using Metropolis‐Hastings within‐Gibbs samplingJournal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 49
D. A. Fournier (2013)
An introduction to AD Model Builder for use in nonlinear modeling and statistics
A. J. Dobson, A. G. Barnett (2008)
An introduction to generalized linear models
R. Hilborn, M. Mangel (1997)
The ecological detective: Confronting models with data
M. Mangel, A. MacCall, J. Brodziak, Robyn Forrest, Roxanna Pourzand, S. Ralston (2013)
A perspective on steepness, reference points, and stock assessmentCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 70
Christopher Legault, Larry Alade, Heath Stone (2006)
Stock Assessment of Georges Bank Yellowtail Flounder for 2011
R. I. Fletcher (1978)
On the restructuring of the Pella‐Tomlinson system, 76
B. Rothschild, Yue Jiao (2013)
Comparison Between Maximum Sustained Yield Proxies and MaximumSustained YieldThe Open Fish Science Journal, 6
T. Polacheck, R. Hilborn, A. Punt (1993)
Fitting Surplus Production Models: Comparing Methods and Measuring UncertaintyCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 50
R. Hilborn, C.J. Walters (1992)
Quantitative fisheries stock assessment: Choice, dynamics and uncertainty
A fishery‐independent survey for stock assessments is made sometimes more than once per year to detect a difference in relative sizes of fish populations (e.g., catch‐per‐unit‐effort [CPUE]) in response to a seasonal change in fish spatial distributions. Many managers tended to treat such data independently instead of systematically synthesizing them. A primary objective of this study was to synthesize all survey data via a simple hierarchical structure. I used the general (Pella‐Tomlinson) surplus production model for the illustration, because the purpose of this study was not a stock assessment, and the model was simpler than an age‐structured model. The surplus production model has about an eight decade history (since Graham's paper in 1935) and has been prominent in fish population dynamics. The logistic (Graham‐Schaefer) version was useful in the sense of simplifying the dynamics of a fish population in relation to its intrinsic growth, natural mortality, recruitment, density‐dependence, and fishery catch, but it was criticized because of its unrealistic limitations. Subsequently, the general version was suggested to accommodate flexibility and be realistic. In this study, I inferred parameters in the general surplus production model, simultaneously synthesizing all available data even from different temporal ranges. I used Georges Bank yellowtail flounder (Limanda ferruginea) data for demonstration.
Journal of Applied Ichthyology – Wiley
Published: Jan 1, 2018
Keywords: ; ; ; ;
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.