Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
C. Rabení, M. Smale (1995)
Effects of siltation on stream fishes and the potential mitigating role of the buffering riparian zoneHydrobiologia, 303
J. Vølstad, N. Roth, G. Mercurio, M. Southerland, D. Strebel (2003)
Using Environmental Stressor Information to Predict the Ecological Status of Maryland Non-tidal Streams as Measured by Biological IndicatorsEnvironmental Monitoring and Assessment, 84
I. Maddock (1999)
The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River HealthFreshwater Biology, 41
J. Mciver, Lynn Starr (2001)
Restoration of degraded lands in the interior Columbia River basin: passive vs. active approachesForest Ecology and Management, 153
C.J.F. Braak, I. Prentice (2004)
A Theory of Gradient AnalysisAdvances in Ecological Research, 34
N. Davies, R. Norris, M. Thoms (2000)
Prediction and assessment of local stream habitat features using large‐scale catchment characteristicsFreshwater Biology, 45
M. Cresser, R. Smart, M. Billett, C. Soulsby, C. Neal, A. Wade, S. Langan, A. Edwards (2000)
Modelling water chemistry for a major Scottish river from catchment attributesJournal of Applied Ecology, 37
M. Hannaford, V. Resh (1995)
Variability in Macroinvertebrate Rapid-Bioassessment Surveys and Habitat Assessments in a Northern California StreamJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 14
Narcís Fornells, Carolina Solà, A. Munné (1998)
QBR: un índice rápido para la evaluación de la calidad de los ecosistemas de ribera
(1994)
Developing a standard geomorphological approach for the appraisal of river projects
T. Oberdorff, D. Pont, B. Hugueny, J. Porcher (2002)
Development and validation of a fish-based index for the assessment of ‘river health’ in FranceFreshwater Biology, 47
N. Roth, J. Allan, D. Erickson (1996)
Landscape influences on stream biotic integrity assessed at multiple spatial scalesLandscape Ecology, 11
(1996)
Monitoring of Aquatic Ecosystems, Loeb SL, Law FM (eds). Lewis: Florida
Lucie Sliva, D. Williams (2001)
Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches to studying land use impact on river water quality.Water research, 35 14
(1984)
Users guide to the Physical Habitat Simulation System (PHABSIM)
M. Hill, R. Jongman, C. Braak, O. Tongeren (1987)
Data analysis in community and landscape ecologyJournal of Animal Science
N. Jaworski (1993)
The application of the ecotone concept in defining nutrient management requirements for the upper Potomac River basinHydrobiologia, 251
C. Braak, P. Šmilauer (1998)
CANOCO Reference Manual and User's Guide to Canoco for Windows: Software for Canonical Community Ordination (Version 4)
(2001)
Restoration of degraded lands in the interior of Columbia River basin: passive vs. active
R. Sponseller, E. Benfield, H. Valett (2001)
Relationships between land use, spatial scale and stream macroinvertebrate communitiesFreshwater Biology, 46
N. Milner, R. Hemsworth, B. Jones (1985)
Habitat evaluation as a fisheries management toolJournal of Fish Biology, 27
C. Frissell, W. Liss, C. Warren, M. Hurley (1986)
A hierarchical framework for stream habitat classification: Viewing streams in a watershed contextEnvironmental Management, 10
(2001)
Buffer zone versus whole catchment approaches in studying landuse on river water quality
G. De’ath (1999)
PRINCIPAL CURVES: A NEW TECHNIQUE FOR INDIRECT AND DIRECT GRADIENT ANALYSISEcology, 80
(1992)
Streamside forest and the physical, chemical and trophic characteristics of piedmont streams in eastern North America
R. Naiman (1994)
Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability And Environmental Change
J. Wright (1995)
Development and use of a system for predicting the macroinvertebrate fauna in flowing watersAustral Ecology, 20
L. Corkum (1989)
Patterns of benthic invertebrate assemblages in rivers of northwestern North AmericaFreshwater Biology, 21
(1994)
Use of ecoregions in biological monitoring
N. Milner, R. Wyatt, K. Broad (1998)
HABSCORE—applications and future developments of related habitat modelsAquatic Conservation-marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 8
T. Reynoldson, R. Norris, V. Resh, K. Day, D. Rosenberg (1997)
The Reference Condition: A Comparison of Multimetric and Multivariate Approaches to Assess Water-Quality Impairment Using Benthic MacroinvertebratesJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 16
J. Imhol, J. FitzGibbon, W. Annable (1996)
A hierarchical evaluation system for characterizing watershed ecosystems for fish habitatCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 53
(2000)
Modelling water
J. Ward, K. Tockner, U. Uehlinger, F. Malard (2001)
Understanding natural patterns and processes in river corridors as the basis for effective river restorationRegulated Rivers-research & Management, 17
P. Bisson, R. Bilby (1998)
Organic Matter and Trophic Dynamics
G. McMahon, D. Harned (1998)
Effect of Environmental Setting on Sediment, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus Concentrations in Albemarle-Pamlico Drainage Basin, North Carolina and Virginia, USAEnvironmental Management, 22
(2002)
viewing streams in the watershed concept
(1997)
River Habitat Survey: a new system for classifying rivers according to their habitat quality
T. Oberdorff, D. Pont, B. Hugueny, D. Chessel (2001)
A probabilistic model characterizing fish assemblages of French rivers: a framework for environmental assessmentFreshwater Biology, 46
B. Sweeney (1992)
Streamside Forests and the Physical, Chemical, and Trophic Characteristics of Piedmont Streams in Eastern North AmericaWater Science and Technology, 26
(1997)
Landscape influence on water chemistry in Midwestern stream
J. Bowlby, J. Roff (1986)
Trout Biomass and Habitat Relationships in Southern Ontario StreamsTransactions of The American Fisheries Society, 115
S. Schumm (1956)
EVOLUTION OF DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND SLOPES IN BADLANDS AT PERTH AMBOY, NEW JERSEYGeological Society of America Bulletin, 67
(1997)
Fish habitat restoration in the Pacific Northwest: Fish Creek of Oregon
A. Ladson, Lindsay White, Jane Doolan, B. Finlayson, B. Hart, P. Lake, J. Tilleard (1999)
Development and testing of an Index of Stream Condition for waterway management in AustraliaFreshwater Biology, 41
S. Gergel, M. Turner, James Miller, J. Melack, E. Stanley (2002)
Landscape indicators of human impacts to riverine systemsAquatic Sciences, 64
M. Scott, L. Hall (1997)
Fish assemblages as indicators of environmental degradation in Maryland coastal plain streamsTransactions of The American Fisheries Society, 126
(1989)
Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and rivers: benthic macroinvertebrates & fish
(1992)
1992.Watershed Management: Balancing Sustainability and Environmental Change
(2001)
STATISTICA for Windows (Computer Program Manual)
L. Johnson, C. Richards, G. Host, J. Arthur (1997)
Landscape influences on water chemistry in Midwestern stream ecosystemsFreshwater Biology, 37
C. Braak (1986)
Canonical Correspondence Analysis: A New Eigenvector Technique for Multivariate Direct Gradient AnalysisEcology, 67
M. Barbour, J. Gerritsen, G. Griffith, R. Frydenborg, E. McCarron, J. White, M. Bastian (1996)
A Framework for Biological Criteria for Florida Streams Using Benthic MacroinvertebratesJournal of the North American Benthological Society, 15
(2001)
PRIMER v5: User Manual/Tutorial. PRIMER-E Plymouth
(1997)
The reference condition: a comparison of multimetric approaches to assess water quality impairment using benthic invertebrates
P. Moyle, Paul Randall (1998)
Evaluating the Biotic Integrity of Watersheds in the Sierra Nevada, CaliforniaConservation Biology, 12
C. Braak, P. Šmilauer (2002)
CANOCO 4.5 Reference Manual and CanoDraw for Windows User's Guide: Software for Canonical Community Ordination
1. This study describes the development of an index for assessing stream habitats in northern Portugal at a variety of spatial scales and levels of perturbation. In developing the index, 86 environmental variables, including regional and local ones, were used to reflect the geomorphological characteristics, riverine habitat, and human activities occurring in each basin. 2. Collections of benthic invertebrates were made at each sample site. To reflect the observed variation in assemblages, the streams were separated into two categories: the North‐west catchments and the Douro catchments. 3. Multivariate analysis techniques applied to the physical and biological data sets allowed the determination of the relative importance of local and regional environmental descriptors in the discrimination of the invertebrate assemblages. 4. Successive statistical refinement procedures yielded 10 variables, all at the local scale. Variation along disturbance gradients allowed the development of a habitat index through scoring criteria that separated reference sites from stressed sites. 5. The results indicate the reduced impact of catchment factors by a buffering influence probably resulting from the presence of a riparian corridor. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems – Wiley
Published: Mar 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.