Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Utopian Literality: Thomas More and the Faith of Catholic Reading

Utopian Literality: Thomas More and the Faith of Catholic Reading <p>Abstract:</p><p>In his writings on the Eucharist, Thomas More defends the literal interpretation of scripture and berates Protestants for their inordinate allegorizing. While literal reading may seem more characteristic of a Protestant hermeneutic, More&apos;s writings suggest that, when it came to the Eucharist, literal reading was no less a Catholic practice, though differently motivated. In his discussion of the Eucharist, More embraces literal reading so as to reclaim the faith, mystery, and transcendence he believes Protestants had discarded when they relied too heavily on allegorical interpretations. The dangers and limitations he ascribes to allegory shape <i>Utopia</i>, a fictional text whose eponymous world is defined by the absence of restrictive figuration. Reading <i>Utopia</i> in this light reclaims More&apos;s theological writings as pertinent to his literary contributions. As such, his work helps us renegotiate the lines between literal and allegorical reading and demonstrates the vitality of the Eucharist in shaping early modern literature.</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Studies in Philology University of North Carolina Press

Utopian Literality: Thomas More and the Faith of Catholic Reading

Studies in Philology , Volume 117 (2) – Mar 25, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/utopian-literality-thomas-more-and-the-faith-of-catholic-reading-gDJ7m1IFIO

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © Studies in Philology, Incorporated
ISSN
1543-0383

Abstract

<p>Abstract:</p><p>In his writings on the Eucharist, Thomas More defends the literal interpretation of scripture and berates Protestants for their inordinate allegorizing. While literal reading may seem more characteristic of a Protestant hermeneutic, More&apos;s writings suggest that, when it came to the Eucharist, literal reading was no less a Catholic practice, though differently motivated. In his discussion of the Eucharist, More embraces literal reading so as to reclaim the faith, mystery, and transcendence he believes Protestants had discarded when they relied too heavily on allegorical interpretations. The dangers and limitations he ascribes to allegory shape <i>Utopia</i>, a fictional text whose eponymous world is defined by the absence of restrictive figuration. Reading <i>Utopia</i> in this light reclaims More&apos;s theological writings as pertinent to his literary contributions. As such, his work helps us renegotiate the lines between literal and allegorical reading and demonstrates the vitality of the Eucharist in shaping early modern literature.</p>

Journal

Studies in PhilologyUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Mar 25, 2020

There are no references for this article.