Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

"The name of soveraynetee": The Private and Public Faces of Marriage in The Franklin's Tale

"The name of soveraynetee": The Private and Public Faces of Marriage in The Franklin's Tale by Cathy Hume HAuCER'SFranklin's Taleopenswithadescriptionofamarriage ofapparentlyidyllichappiness.ThemarriageofArveragusand Dorigen follows a long courtship where Arveragus served his ladyDorigenthroughmanyactsofchivalryandistobequitedifferent from the model of dominant husband and obedient wife adopted by WalterandGrisildeintheClerk's Tale.Arveragusswears Thatnevereinalhislyfhe,daynenyght, Nesholdeuponhymtakenomaistrie Agaynhirwyl,nekithehirejalousie, Buthireobeye,andfolwehirwylinal, Asanyloveretohisladyshal. Inreturn,Dorigenswearstobehis"humbletrewewyf"(758).Thenarratorapprovesthisasa"humble,wysaccord"(791)andgoesontoexplainthat,paradoxically,Arveragusis ...botheinlordshipeandservage. Servage?Nay,butinlordshipeabove, Sithhehathbothhisladyandhislove; Hislady,certes,andhiswyfalso. (794­97) Thisarrangementhasbeenseenasutopian--mostfamouslybyG.L. Kittredge,whoarguedthat"abetterhasneverbeendevisedorimagTheFranklin's Tale,in The Riverside Chaucer,3rded.,gen.ed.LarryD.Benson(Oxford: OxforduniversityPress,1987),lines746­50.SubsequentreferencestoThe Franklin's Tale aretothiseditionandwillbecitedparentheticallywithinthetextbylinenumber. 284 ©2008TheuniversityofNorthCarolinaPress Cathy Hume ined" and that it was Chaucer's own ideal. Indeed, it leads to more thanayearofmaritalbliss. However,themodelcontainsacontradictionthatismorethanamere elegantoxymoron.AlthoughjillMannarguesthatthealternationbetween"lordshipe"and`servage"representsaflexible,fluctuatingrelationship,thefactisthatArveragus'spublicroleisgoingtoshownosuch flexibility.Whilerenouncing"maistrie"inprivate,hewillretain"the nameofsoveraynetee...forshameofhisdegree"(751­52).Inother words,hisconcernwithreputationwillleadhimtopaylipserviceto an ideal of male dominance that he does not espouse in private. At thepoem'scrisis,Arveragus'sbehaviorbecomesevenmorecontradictory.HetellsDorigenthatsheshouldfulfillheradulterouspromiseto Aurelius,whichimpliesthatherespectsherasanautonomoushuman being whose personal word should be honored rather than someone heownsandcontrols.Buthethenordershertotellnooneaboutwhat she is doing and threatens her with death if she does so. Arveragus has,then,bothrenegedonhisvowto"takenomaistrie"anddeepened thefissurebetweenthecouple'sprivatemaritalbehavior(whichnow encompasseshusband-sanctionedadultery)andtheconventionalface theypresenttothepublic. Howcan we account for this? In Alfred David's view, "Arveragus' insistenceonkeepinguptheappearancewhilewillingtosufferthefact diminishes hisnobilityandraises a seriousquestion aboutthedepth of the Franklin's conception of `gentilesse.'" Cynthia A. Gravlee believesthatArveragus'sconcernforhispublicimageoutweighshislove forDorigenandthathisapparentinterestin"trouthe,"whichsuitshis imageofworthyknight,isunderminedbyhissuppressionofthetruth fromthepublic.Shouldwe,then,considerArveragusahypocrite?Was Kittredge,"Chaucer'sDiscussionofMarriage,"Modern Philology9(1912):467. Mann,Feminizing Chaucer(Cambridge:D.S.Brewer,2002),90. johnM.FylerandCraigR.Davisarguethatwearetoseethispublicshowasawayof compensatingforArveragus'slowsocialstatus("LoveandDegreeintheFranklin's Tale," Chaucer Review21[1987]:321­37;"APerfectMarriageontheRocks:GeoffreyandPhilippa Chaucer,andtheFranklin's Tale,"Chaucer Review37[2002]:129­44).However,Iamnot convincedthatwearemeanttoseeanyseriousdisparityofstatusbetweenthe"knyght" ArveragusandDorigen's"heighkynrede"(735),sincethelatterissobrieflyandvaguely mentionedandseemstobesignificantmainlyasamanifestationofArveragus'sconventionalfeelingofbeingunworthyofhislady. David,The Strumpet Muse: Art and Morals in Chaucer's Poetry(Bloomington:Indiana universityPress,1976),190. Gravlee,"Presence,AbsenceandDifference:ReceptionandDeceptioninThe Franklin's Tale,"inDesiring Discourse: The Literature of Love, Ovid through Chaucer,ed.jamesj.Paxson andCynthiaA.Gravlee(Selinsgrove,PA:SusquehannauniversityPress,1998),181. he never truly committed to an equal marriage? Or was his utopian ideal unworkably flawed from http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Studies in Philology University of North Carolina Press

"The name of soveraynetee": The Private and Public Faces of Marriage in The Franklin's Tale

Studies in Philology , Volume 105 (3) – Jul 17, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/the-name-of-soveraynetee-the-private-and-public-faces-of-marriage-in-MSq0TjWldy

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 The University of North Carolina Press
ISSN
1543-0383
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

by Cathy Hume HAuCER'SFranklin's Taleopenswithadescriptionofamarriage ofapparentlyidyllichappiness.ThemarriageofArveragusand Dorigen follows a long courtship where Arveragus served his ladyDorigenthroughmanyactsofchivalryandistobequitedifferent from the model of dominant husband and obedient wife adopted by WalterandGrisildeintheClerk's Tale.Arveragusswears Thatnevereinalhislyfhe,daynenyght, Nesholdeuponhymtakenomaistrie Agaynhirwyl,nekithehirejalousie, Buthireobeye,andfolwehirwylinal, Asanyloveretohisladyshal. Inreturn,Dorigenswearstobehis"humbletrewewyf"(758).Thenarratorapprovesthisasa"humble,wysaccord"(791)andgoesontoexplainthat,paradoxically,Arveragusis ...botheinlordshipeandservage. Servage?Nay,butinlordshipeabove, Sithhehathbothhisladyandhislove; Hislady,certes,andhiswyfalso. (794­97) Thisarrangementhasbeenseenasutopian--mostfamouslybyG.L. Kittredge,whoarguedthat"abetterhasneverbeendevisedorimagTheFranklin's Tale,in The Riverside Chaucer,3rded.,gen.ed.LarryD.Benson(Oxford: OxforduniversityPress,1987),lines746­50.SubsequentreferencestoThe Franklin's Tale aretothiseditionandwillbecitedparentheticallywithinthetextbylinenumber. 284 ©2008TheuniversityofNorthCarolinaPress Cathy Hume ined" and that it was Chaucer's own ideal. Indeed, it leads to more thanayearofmaritalbliss. However,themodelcontainsacontradictionthatismorethanamere elegantoxymoron.AlthoughjillMannarguesthatthealternationbetween"lordshipe"and`servage"representsaflexible,fluctuatingrelationship,thefactisthatArveragus'spublicroleisgoingtoshownosuch flexibility.Whilerenouncing"maistrie"inprivate,hewillretain"the nameofsoveraynetee...forshameofhisdegree"(751­52).Inother words,hisconcernwithreputationwillleadhimtopaylipserviceto an ideal of male dominance that he does not espouse in private. At thepoem'scrisis,Arveragus'sbehaviorbecomesevenmorecontradictory.HetellsDorigenthatsheshouldfulfillheradulterouspromiseto Aurelius,whichimpliesthatherespectsherasanautonomoushuman being whose personal word should be honored rather than someone heownsandcontrols.Buthethenordershertotellnooneaboutwhat she is doing and threatens her with death if she does so. Arveragus has,then,bothrenegedonhisvowto"takenomaistrie"anddeepened thefissurebetweenthecouple'sprivatemaritalbehavior(whichnow encompasseshusband-sanctionedadultery)andtheconventionalface theypresenttothepublic. Howcan we account for this? In Alfred David's view, "Arveragus' insistenceonkeepinguptheappearancewhilewillingtosufferthefact diminishes hisnobilityandraises a seriousquestion aboutthedepth of the Franklin's conception of `gentilesse.'" Cynthia A. Gravlee believesthatArveragus'sconcernforhispublicimageoutweighshislove forDorigenandthathisapparentinterestin"trouthe,"whichsuitshis imageofworthyknight,isunderminedbyhissuppressionofthetruth fromthepublic.Shouldwe,then,considerArveragusahypocrite?Was Kittredge,"Chaucer'sDiscussionofMarriage,"Modern Philology9(1912):467. Mann,Feminizing Chaucer(Cambridge:D.S.Brewer,2002),90. johnM.FylerandCraigR.Davisarguethatwearetoseethispublicshowasawayof compensatingforArveragus'slowsocialstatus("LoveandDegreeintheFranklin's Tale," Chaucer Review21[1987]:321­37;"APerfectMarriageontheRocks:GeoffreyandPhilippa Chaucer,andtheFranklin's Tale,"Chaucer Review37[2002]:129­44).However,Iamnot convincedthatwearemeanttoseeanyseriousdisparityofstatusbetweenthe"knyght" ArveragusandDorigen's"heighkynrede"(735),sincethelatterissobrieflyandvaguely mentionedandseemstobesignificantmainlyasamanifestationofArveragus'sconventionalfeelingofbeingunworthyofhislady. David,The Strumpet Muse: Art and Morals in Chaucer's Poetry(Bloomington:Indiana universityPress,1976),190. Gravlee,"Presence,AbsenceandDifference:ReceptionandDeceptioninThe Franklin's Tale,"inDesiring Discourse: The Literature of Love, Ovid through Chaucer,ed.jamesj.Paxson andCynthiaA.Gravlee(Selinsgrove,PA:SusquehannauniversityPress,1998),181. he never truly committed to an equal marriage? Or was his utopian ideal unworkably flawed from

Journal

Studies in PhilologyUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Jul 17, 2008

There are no references for this article.