Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
<p>Abstract:</p><p>This is the first of two articles for <i>Studies in Philology</i> that situate the Middle English <i>Athelston</i> within the context of the Peasants' Revolt of 1381. The article traces the poem's fictional scenario of a historical Anglo-Saxon king occupying the throne of late fourteenth-century England, along with its legal preoccupations, obfuscation of the hero role, and the centrality of the verbal oath, to the political vision and recruitment practices of the peasant insurgents, who sought to restore perceived rights and privileges enjoyed by their predecessors under the Anglo-Saxon kings, a vision they pursued first in the law courts before taking to the streets. Through a series of type scenes structuring the entire poem, the poet frames Athelston as an outlaw, a tyrant, and a heathen despot respectively, ultimately discrediting him as a ruler along with the divisive political vision he embodies, offering instead a more conciliatory, state-sanctioned model of Anglo-Saxon identity in the form of St. Edmund.</p>
Studies in Philology – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Jan 15, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.