Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
R. RadhakRishnan e Th Epistemology of Pessimism The glass is half full; the glass is half empty. What is the big deal? Clearly, both statements are empirically valid descriptions of reality. Why is he the pessimist who sees the glass as half empty, and she the optimist who sees it half full? Why is it not intelligible to exclaim in consternation, “Oh No! The glass is full,” or “How wonderful! The glass is empty!” Why is plenitude an indicator of positivity and emptiness the sign of negativity? At what point is a neutral perception made to take on the interpretive bias of a certain worldview, a lean, a certain conative ori- entation? In other words, why should the description of reality have any bearing on the mood or psychological disposition of the perceiver? Why does the objective description of the state of fullness or emptiness of the glass take a subjective turn? The underlying issue here is that of phenomenological perspectivism that seeks a balance between a given objectivity and the embodied subjective and perspectival path towards objectivi1ty The g . iven and pre- personal objectivity of the world as real does not preempt the reality that this very
The Comparatist – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Nov 15, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.