Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
<p>Abstract:</p><p>When guerrilla war first broke out in northern Mexico, the motives and modalities of the violence Americans and Mexicans inflicted on each other were informed by previous fighting with Native Americans, and American attitudes were also shaped by Jacksonian Democracy, with its hardening racial attitudes and vigilantism. In northern Mexico, US officers tried and failed to control atrocities against Mexican civilians. During the later US invasion of central Mexico, US officers sought to prevent guerrilla warfare by restraining US troops and threatening Mexican civilians with reprisals. After guerrilla warfare developed there and began to hamper their operations, commanders implicitly encouraged atrocities through their lack of action against US soldiers who committed them and the assignment of known perpetrators to counterinsurgency duty. US leaders did not use explicit legal reasoning and did not even always document de facto policies. During the Civil War, in contrast, US officers and lawyers developed anti-guerrilla policies that they documented in orders and justified through legal reasoning.</p>
The Journal of the Civil War Era – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Feb 15, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.