Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Predictions

Predictions foru m The Future of Civil War Era Studies Stephen Berry, University of Georgia http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-of- civil-war-era-studies Civil War scholarship has never been in a healthier place or in broader agreement on fundamentals. Was the war destructive? Yes. Total? No. Hard? Yes. Did the home front matter? Yes. But battles mattered too, right? Yes, but you’re bugging me by acting like these are two entirely dif- ferent things. Did slavery cause the war? Yes. But states’ rights mattered too, right? Yes, if you mean a state’s right to protect its interest in slaves. Was the war won and lost in the West? Yes, militarily. Was it won and lost in the East? Yes, politically. Was the South modernizing? Yes. But not as quickly as the North, right? Well, maybe, but you’re bugging me again by acting like modernization (and capitalism) have only one form. Was guer- rilla warfare important? Yes. But was it decisive? We don’t know yet—but it will never be ignored again. Did African Americans bring slavery down? Yes, but not without the help of the Union army. Did a divided Confederacy bring itself down? Yes, but again, not without the help of the Union army. (The Yankees, as Pickett famously said of his own defeat, had something to do with it.) Did the North fi ght the war with one hand tied behind its back? No, it simply had a bigger job to do, and besides, when you’re fi ghting a war against yourself, you want to win by as little as possible. And that’s why the war evolved? And that’s why the war evolved. With so many of these old debates quiescent, where does that leave us; where do we go from here? In the following forum, scholars off er their predictions as to how their subfi elds will evolve over the next ten years in eight specifi c areas: nationalism studies; the environmental history of the war; the history of race; the study of Northern civilians, especially African American women; the fading notion that there even was a Confederate home front; military history; and the emerging fi eld of capitalism and slav- ery. Leading off , I off er my “top ten” predictions for how broader profes- sional trends will reshape Civil War historiography in the next decade. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of the Civil War Era University of North Carolina Press

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/predictions-pIDZ0lHlTT

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright @ The University of North Carolina Press
ISSN
2159-9807

Abstract

foru m The Future of Civil War Era Studies Stephen Berry, University of Georgia http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-of- civil-war-era-studies Civil War scholarship has never been in a healthier place or in broader agreement on fundamentals. Was the war destructive? Yes. Total? No. Hard? Yes. Did the home front matter? Yes. But battles mattered too, right? Yes, but you’re bugging me by acting like these are two entirely dif- ferent things. Did slavery cause the war? Yes. But states’ rights mattered too, right? Yes, if you mean a state’s right to protect its interest in slaves. Was the war won and lost in the West? Yes, militarily. Was it won and lost in the East? Yes, politically. Was the South modernizing? Yes. But not as quickly as the North, right? Well, maybe, but you’re bugging me again by acting like modernization (and capitalism) have only one form. Was guer- rilla warfare important? Yes. But was it decisive? We don’t know yet—but it will never be ignored again. Did African Americans bring slavery down? Yes, but not without the help of the Union army. Did a divided Confederacy bring itself down? Yes, but again, not without the help of the Union army. (The Yankees, as Pickett famously said of his own defeat, had something to do with it.) Did the North fi ght the war with one hand tied behind its back? No, it simply had a bigger job to do, and besides, when you’re fi ghting a war against yourself, you want to win by as little as possible. And that’s why the war evolved? And that’s why the war evolved. With so many of these old debates quiescent, where does that leave us; where do we go from here? In the following forum, scholars off er their predictions as to how their subfi elds will evolve over the next ten years in eight specifi c areas: nationalism studies; the environmental history of the war; the history of race; the study of Northern civilians, especially African American women; the fading notion that there even was a Confederate home front; military history; and the emerging fi eld of capitalism and slav- ery. Leading off , I off er my “top ten” predictions for how broader profes- sional trends will reshape Civil War historiography in the next decade.

Journal

The Journal of the Civil War EraUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Feb 23, 2012

There are no references for this article.