Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
by RITINGinhisA Chronicle of the Kings of England(1643),Sir RichardBakerrecallstheyear1596,whichsawthedeathof "Richardfletcher,BishopofLondon;whoformarryingthe LadyBaker(asgoodlyaLadyashewasaPrelate)incurredtheQueens displeasure;andtocurehiscares,fellimmoderatelytodrinkingofTobacco, and so expired." The anecdote in some ways typifies Baker's work,whichoccasionallydetoursintovividgossipbeforereturningto the higher matter of kings and parliaments.Yet Baker's rendering of thisincidentmaybemorethanasimpleillustrationofthedifficultiesof Elizabethancourtiership,forinitBakerseemstotakeparticularcareto emphasizetheconnectionoftobaccotopoliticaldisobedience.Matters of personal desire--love and excess--are confronted in a moment of royaldispleasure,resultingintherapiddegenerationofboththeindividualmanandthebishop. Baker's anecdote might remain solelya matterof entertainment or historicalcuriosityifnotforitsappearancein1643,oneyearafterKing Charles I had raised his standard against Parliament at Nottingham. Likeothersinhisfamily,BakerappearstohavebeenaRoyalist,writingamanuscriptrebuttalagainstWilliamPrynne'sHistriomastix(later publishedposthumously)andsubsequentlydedicatinghischronicleto Charles(II),thenPrinceofWales.Givenbothitsauthor'spoliticalleaningsandthemomentofthetext'spublication,thefulltitleofBaker's Baker,A Chronicle of the Kings of England(London,1643),86. Baker's extended family also seems to have been staunchly Royalist, so much so that the Dictionary of national Biography (DnB) records that his cousin's declaration to Charles I's side during the English Civil War finally reduced their already precarious 100 ©2009TheuniversityofNorthCarolinaPress chronicle--A chronicle of the Kings of England, from the time of the Romans goverment unto the raigne of our soveraigne lord, King Charles--must be seen less as a description and more as a deeplycontentious political argument.In1643theinviolabilityofCharlesI'ssovereigntyandprerogativedemandedbattlefieldproofratherthanliteraryassertion. What then can we make of this Elizabethan anecdote in a Caroline text, particularly when recounted by an author personally invested in the period's struggle over kingly rule? Such an enticing combinationoftobacco,immoderation,andlustplayedoutoverthedramaof royalandsubjectdesiresrecallsforus--asIexpectitwouldhaverecalledforBaker--thehostilitytotobaccoexpressedbyjamesI,father toCharlesandthemonarchwho,inhisveryfirstyearonthethrone, hadbothpublishedA Counterblaste to Tobacco(1603)andknightedour author.TheCounterblastefiguresprominentlyinmostcurrentresearch on early modern England and tobacco,
Studies in Philology – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Jan 11, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.