Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

"Nest pas autentik, mais apocrophum": Haveloks and Their Reception in Medieval England

"Nest pas autentik, mais apocrophum": Haveloks and Their Reception in Medieval England by Richard J. Moll IKE many medieval narratives, the storyof Havelok exists somewherebetweenromanceandhistory,and,tobefrank,modernliterarycriticsaremoreinterestedinromancethanhistory.TheromanceversionsoftheHavelokstory,therefore,havereceivedthelion's shareofcriticalattention.Thisisonlytobeexpected,asboththeAngloNorman and Middle English Havelok poems are excellent examples ofearlyromanceanddeservecarefulcriticalscrutiny.Recentworkon Havelok, however, has begun to examine more closely the historical textsinwhichtheDanishheroisbutoneofdozens,orevenhundreds, of British rulers. Still, critical comment on the story as it is found in chroniclestendstotreatthesetextsassourcesofinformationregardingtheromances,particularlytheMiddleEnglishHavelok the Dane.By themid-fourteenthcentury,however,Havelokhadbecomepartofthe broadly defined "Brut tradition," and his story was widely available bothasanindependentromancenarrativeandasyetanotherepisode within the lengthy cycle of British historiography. Despite this dual See, for example, Caroline Eckhardt, "Havelok the Dane in Castleford's Chronicle," Studies in Philology98(2001):1­17,andjuliaMarvin,"HavelokintheProseBrutTradition,"Studies in Philology102(2005):280­306.Ishouldpointoutthatinusingtheterms "chronicle"and"romance"Idonotwishtoprovokedebateconcerningthegenreofany particulartext.Ingeneral,Iuse"romance"toindicatetheepisodicversionsofthestory, particularly the Middle English Havelok (as opposed to the Anglo-Norman Lai ). for a recentdiscussionofthegenreofthetextthatincludesthoroughbibliographyonthesubject, see K. S.Whetter, "Gest and Vita, folktale and Romance in Havelok," Parergon 20, no.2(2003):21­46.Whetter(andindeedmostcriticswhoaddressthequestionofgenre) focusesontheMiddleEnglishtextitself,whileIamconcernedwiththewaysthatthe narrativewasreceived. 165 ©2007TheUniversityofNorthCarolinaPress Haveloks in Medieval England existence,theimpactofthestory'sgenericconfusiononthereception ofitsvariousretellingshasgonelargelyunquestioned,withthenotable exceptionofaboldstatementinThorlacTurville-Petre'sstudy,England the Nation:"Werarelyhavemuchevidenceonthewayinwhichcontemporary readers classified a medieval work, but it is clear that the storyofHavelok,thoughwhollyfictional,wasunhesitatinglyaccepted asahistoryintheearlyfourteenthcentury."Turville-Petre'scomment hasmuchofinterestinit(whichheaddressesintheanalysisthatfollows),butIwanttoexaminetworelatedissues:first,theassumption thattherewassuchasthingas"theHavelokstory";and,second,the claimthatsuchastory"wasunhesitatinglyacceptedasahistory."As thequotationmakesclear,Turville-Petreismostinterestedintheearly fourteenthcentury,butitisdifficulttogaugethereceptionoftheHavelok story in this period, since the earliest surviving versions do not makeexplicittheirjudgmentofthenarrative'shistoricalauthority.By midcentury,however,RobertMannyngandSirThomasGrayhadseriousdoubtsaboutthevalidityofthetale,andfifteenth-centuryscribes wereoftenatalossastohowtodealwithatraditionthathadbecome confusedandcontradictory.Ifindeedearlyfourteenth-centuryauthors thoughtthestoryofHavelokwashistory,thosewhoreadtheirwork evenagenerationlaterweremuchlesscertainaboutthehistoricityof Havelok'sreign. TheearliestaccountsofHavelok(thosedatedbefore1350)arewell known.Thecompletenarrativeshavebeeneditednumeroustimes,and the shorter passages found in chronicles have been summarized and reprintedsincefredericMadden'sfirsteditionoftheEnglishromance. ThefirstsurvivingHavelokstoryisfoundinGeffreiGaimar'sL'Estoire des Engleis,composedinAnglo-Normaninthelate1130s.Gaimar'saccountiscloselyrelatedtotheLai d'Haveloc(ca.1190­1220),anditmay beconvenienttosummarizesomeofthesalientfeaturesoftheplot.I shouldnotethatmyinterestisnotinrecappingthewholeplotbutin emphasizingthoseinstanceswherethesetextsdifferfromtheMiddle Englishromance: DuringthereignofConstantine,thereweretwootherkingsinBritain,Adelbriht(whoruledNorfolkandpartsofLincolnshire)andEdelsi(whoruledLincoln and Lindsey). Adelbriht marries Edelsi's sister,Orwain.When ill, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Studies in Philology University of North Carolina Press

"Nest pas autentik, mais apocrophum": Haveloks and Their Reception in Medieval England

Studies in Philology , Volume 105 (2) – Mar 31, 2008

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/nest-pas-autentik-mais-apocrophum-haveloks-and-their-reception-in-RAY47tIJOR

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by The University of North Carolina Press. All rights reserved.
ISSN
1543-0383
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

by Richard J. Moll IKE many medieval narratives, the storyof Havelok exists somewherebetweenromanceandhistory,and,tobefrank,modernliterarycriticsaremoreinterestedinromancethanhistory.TheromanceversionsoftheHavelokstory,therefore,havereceivedthelion's shareofcriticalattention.Thisisonlytobeexpected,asboththeAngloNorman and Middle English Havelok poems are excellent examples ofearlyromanceanddeservecarefulcriticalscrutiny.Recentworkon Havelok, however, has begun to examine more closely the historical textsinwhichtheDanishheroisbutoneofdozens,orevenhundreds, of British rulers. Still, critical comment on the story as it is found in chroniclestendstotreatthesetextsassourcesofinformationregardingtheromances,particularlytheMiddleEnglishHavelok the Dane.By themid-fourteenthcentury,however,Havelokhadbecomepartofthe broadly defined "Brut tradition," and his story was widely available bothasanindependentromancenarrativeandasyetanotherepisode within the lengthy cycle of British historiography. Despite this dual See, for example, Caroline Eckhardt, "Havelok the Dane in Castleford's Chronicle," Studies in Philology98(2001):1­17,andjuliaMarvin,"HavelokintheProseBrutTradition,"Studies in Philology102(2005):280­306.Ishouldpointoutthatinusingtheterms "chronicle"and"romance"Idonotwishtoprovokedebateconcerningthegenreofany particulartext.Ingeneral,Iuse"romance"toindicatetheepisodicversionsofthestory, particularly the Middle English Havelok (as opposed to the Anglo-Norman Lai ). for a recentdiscussionofthegenreofthetextthatincludesthoroughbibliographyonthesubject, see K. S.Whetter, "Gest and Vita, folktale and Romance in Havelok," Parergon 20, no.2(2003):21­46.Whetter(andindeedmostcriticswhoaddressthequestionofgenre) focusesontheMiddleEnglishtextitself,whileIamconcernedwiththewaysthatthe narrativewasreceived. 165 ©2007TheUniversityofNorthCarolinaPress Haveloks in Medieval England existence,theimpactofthestory'sgenericconfusiononthereception ofitsvariousretellingshasgonelargelyunquestioned,withthenotable exceptionofaboldstatementinThorlacTurville-Petre'sstudy,England the Nation:"Werarelyhavemuchevidenceonthewayinwhichcontemporary readers classified a medieval work, but it is clear that the storyofHavelok,thoughwhollyfictional,wasunhesitatinglyaccepted asahistoryintheearlyfourteenthcentury."Turville-Petre'scomment hasmuchofinterestinit(whichheaddressesintheanalysisthatfollows),butIwanttoexaminetworelatedissues:first,theassumption thattherewassuchasthingas"theHavelokstory";and,second,the claimthatsuchastory"wasunhesitatinglyacceptedasahistory."As thequotationmakesclear,Turville-Petreismostinterestedintheearly fourteenthcentury,butitisdifficulttogaugethereceptionoftheHavelok story in this period, since the earliest surviving versions do not makeexplicittheirjudgmentofthenarrative'shistoricalauthority.By midcentury,however,RobertMannyngandSirThomasGrayhadseriousdoubtsaboutthevalidityofthetale,andfifteenth-centuryscribes wereoftenatalossastohowtodealwithatraditionthathadbecome confusedandcontradictory.Ifindeedearlyfourteenth-centuryauthors thoughtthestoryofHavelokwashistory,thosewhoreadtheirwork evenagenerationlaterweremuchlesscertainaboutthehistoricityof Havelok'sreign. TheearliestaccountsofHavelok(thosedatedbefore1350)arewell known.Thecompletenarrativeshavebeeneditednumeroustimes,and the shorter passages found in chronicles have been summarized and reprintedsincefredericMadden'sfirsteditionoftheEnglishromance. ThefirstsurvivingHavelokstoryisfoundinGeffreiGaimar'sL'Estoire des Engleis,composedinAnglo-Normaninthelate1130s.Gaimar'saccountiscloselyrelatedtotheLai d'Haveloc(ca.1190­1220),anditmay beconvenienttosummarizesomeofthesalientfeaturesoftheplot.I shouldnotethatmyinterestisnotinrecappingthewholeplotbutin emphasizingthoseinstanceswherethesetextsdifferfromtheMiddle Englishromance: DuringthereignofConstantine,thereweretwootherkingsinBritain,Adelbriht(whoruledNorfolkandpartsofLincolnshire)andEdelsi(whoruledLincoln and Lindsey). Adelbriht marries Edelsi's sister,Orwain.When ill,

Journal

Studies in PhilologyUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Mar 31, 2008

There are no references for this article.