Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

"Ne spared they to strip her naked all": Reading, Rape, and Reformation in Spenser's Faerie Queene

"Ne spared they to strip her naked all": Reading, Rape, and Reformation in Spenser's Faerie... <p>Abstract:</p><p>In book 2 of Edmund Spenser&apos;s <i>Faerie Queene</i>, Archimago and Duessa accuse the Redcross Knight of rape. Although both Spenser and his critics have long treated their accusation as false, this essay argues that it has three layers of truth: Duessa&apos;s stripping in book 1 is a literal sexual assault; it is a metaphorical rape; and, due to the accusation&apos;s use of metaphor and ellipsis, it mirrors Spenser&apos;s own narration with surprising accuracy. This third sense of the accusation&apos;s truth illustrates the representational challenges of rape and the fissures between literal and figurative meanings—hermeneutic concerns violently at issue in the Reformation. Duessa&apos;s stripping and dismissed rape accusation illuminate the complex interrelation of three things: shifting early modern attitudes toward rape, the Protestant turn to inwardness both hermeneutically and soteriologically, and the interpretive and moral problems of allegory after the Reformation. Thus, the disturbingly gendered interpretive violence of <i>Faerie Queene</i> reflects not only the grim misogyny of the sixteenth century but also a broader hermeneutic and epistemological crisis.</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Studies in Philology University of North Carolina Press

"Ne spared they to strip her naked all": Reading, Rape, and Reformation in Spenser&apos;s Faerie Queene

Studies in Philology , Volume 117 (2) – Mar 25, 2020

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/ne-spared-they-to-strip-her-naked-all-reading-rape-and-reformation-in-Sm3mVHlY9s

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © Studies in Philology, Incorporated
ISSN
1543-0383

Abstract

<p>Abstract:</p><p>In book 2 of Edmund Spenser&apos;s <i>Faerie Queene</i>, Archimago and Duessa accuse the Redcross Knight of rape. Although both Spenser and his critics have long treated their accusation as false, this essay argues that it has three layers of truth: Duessa&apos;s stripping in book 1 is a literal sexual assault; it is a metaphorical rape; and, due to the accusation&apos;s use of metaphor and ellipsis, it mirrors Spenser&apos;s own narration with surprising accuracy. This third sense of the accusation&apos;s truth illustrates the representational challenges of rape and the fissures between literal and figurative meanings—hermeneutic concerns violently at issue in the Reformation. Duessa&apos;s stripping and dismissed rape accusation illuminate the complex interrelation of three things: shifting early modern attitudes toward rape, the Protestant turn to inwardness both hermeneutically and soteriologically, and the interpretive and moral problems of allegory after the Reformation. Thus, the disturbingly gendered interpretive violence of <i>Faerie Queene</i> reflects not only the grim misogyny of the sixteenth century but also a broader hermeneutic and epistemological crisis.</p>

Journal

Studies in PhilologyUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Mar 25, 2020

There are no references for this article.