Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Nationalism

Nationalism foru m The Future of Civil War Era Studies Michael T. Bernath, University of Miami http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-of- civil-war-era-studies It is time, indeed past time, for Civil War historians to fully engage in wider debates surrounding the rise of nationalism in the modern world. Historians of early America have long employed a comparative approach, and those of the Civil War era must follow suit. For if the initial imagining of the American community has benefi ted from a larger perspective (call it comparative, transatlantic, or transnational), so too does the reimagining of the American community or, rather, communities in the mid-nineteenth century. Indeed, the commonalities and parallels between U.S. national- ism and nationalism elsewhere in the world are even clearer and perhaps more instructive in the nineteenth century than during that earlier period. Nationalism was not something that happened to nineteenth-century Americans, not some inexorable force in which they found themselves passively caught. Rather, it was consciously created, cultivated, and con- structed by them. Civil War Americans spoke and understood the language of nationalism. This was something they shared with others around the globe, and these commonalities, these common understandings and meth- ods of nation-making and legitimation, demand that Civil War historians broaden their horizons. If the problem for historians of early American identity has been grappling with the famous “roof without walls,” we who work in the mid-nineteenth century face a very diff erent challenge, a very diff erent edifi ce—one more structurally sound, perhaps, but far more ungainly. We have lots of walls, not all of them load-bearing, and two diff erent roofs to deal with. My prediction, my hope, is that historians will not simply use nationalism as a tool for explaining the onset and outcome of the war but will ask what the Civil War experience can teach us about the workings of nationalism itself. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The Journal of the Civil War Era University of North Carolina Press

Nationalism

Bernath, Michael T.
The Journal of the Civil War Era , Volume 2 (1) – Feb 23, 2012
Download PDF
1 page

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/nationalism-D0vXXpvH1E

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright @ The University of North Carolina Press
ISSN
2159-9807

Abstract

foru m The Future of Civil War Era Studies Michael T. Bernath, University of Miami http://journalofthecivilwarera.com/forum-the-future-of- civil-war-era-studies It is time, indeed past time, for Civil War historians to fully engage in wider debates surrounding the rise of nationalism in the modern world. Historians of early America have long employed a comparative approach, and those of the Civil War era must follow suit. For if the initial imagining of the American community has benefi ted from a larger perspective (call it comparative, transatlantic, or transnational), so too does the reimagining of the American community or, rather, communities in the mid-nineteenth century. Indeed, the commonalities and parallels between U.S. national- ism and nationalism elsewhere in the world are even clearer and perhaps more instructive in the nineteenth century than during that earlier period. Nationalism was not something that happened to nineteenth-century Americans, not some inexorable force in which they found themselves passively caught. Rather, it was consciously created, cultivated, and con- structed by them. Civil War Americans spoke and understood the language of nationalism. This was something they shared with others around the globe, and these commonalities, these common understandings and meth- ods of nation-making and legitimation, demand that Civil War historians broaden their horizons. If the problem for historians of early American identity has been grappling with the famous “roof without walls,” we who work in the mid-nineteenth century face a very diff erent challenge, a very diff erent edifi ce—one more structurally sound, perhaps, but far more ungainly. We have lots of walls, not all of them load-bearing, and two diff erent roofs to deal with. My prediction, my hope, is that historians will not simply use nationalism as a tool for explaining the onset and outcome of the war but will ask what the Civil War experience can teach us about the workings of nationalism itself.

Journal

The Journal of the Civil War Era – University of North Carolina Press

Published: Feb 23, 2012

There are no references for this article.