Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

"Love that oughte ben secree": Secrecy and Alternate Endings in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde

"Love that oughte ben secree": Secrecy and Alternate Endings in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde <p>Abstract:</p><p>This article examines the power dynamics of erotic secret-keeping and revelation in Geoffrey Chaucer&apos;s <i>Troilus and Criseyde</i>. Chaucer uses competing discourses of secrecy (fin&apos;amors, romance, <i>fabliau</i>, and epic history) in order to draw attention to the fantasies in which his characters—and by implication his readers—indulge about alternative actions within and endings for the narrative. While the critical discussion of power and the play of genres in the poem has been robust, scholars have paid less attention to secrecy in <i>Troilus and Criseyde</i> as it underpins Chaucer&apos;s representations of power and use of genres. I argue that the power dynamics of secrecy not only structure the characters&apos; competing bids for narrative control but also enable Chaucer&apos;s audiences to examine our own impulses and fantasies as we interpret the poem. Discourses of secrecy prompt a consideration of the partial nature of knowledge and show Chaucer grappling with two questions about knowledge and narrative: how do we know what we know about the stories we read, and how does that knowing influence our reading? Chaucer&apos;s characters ask versions of these questions, inviting audiences to ask them as well.</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Studies in Philology University of North Carolina Press

"Love that oughte ben secree": Secrecy and Alternate Endings in Chaucer&apos;s Troilus and Criseyde

Studies in Philology , Volume 116 (4) – Sep 30, 2019

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/love-that-oughte-ben-secree-secrecy-and-alternate-endings-in-chaucer-NlEW7FZLaM

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © Studies in Philology, Incorporated
ISSN
1543-0383

Abstract

<p>Abstract:</p><p>This article examines the power dynamics of erotic secret-keeping and revelation in Geoffrey Chaucer&apos;s <i>Troilus and Criseyde</i>. Chaucer uses competing discourses of secrecy (fin&apos;amors, romance, <i>fabliau</i>, and epic history) in order to draw attention to the fantasies in which his characters—and by implication his readers—indulge about alternative actions within and endings for the narrative. While the critical discussion of power and the play of genres in the poem has been robust, scholars have paid less attention to secrecy in <i>Troilus and Criseyde</i> as it underpins Chaucer&apos;s representations of power and use of genres. I argue that the power dynamics of secrecy not only structure the characters&apos; competing bids for narrative control but also enable Chaucer&apos;s audiences to examine our own impulses and fantasies as we interpret the poem. Discourses of secrecy prompt a consideration of the partial nature of knowledge and show Chaucer grappling with two questions about knowledge and narrative: how do we know what we know about the stories we read, and how does that knowing influence our reading? Chaucer&apos;s characters ask versions of these questions, inviting audiences to ask them as well.</p>

Journal

Studies in PhilologyUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Sep 30, 2019

There are no references for this article.