Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Love’s (and Law’s) Illusions in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale

Love’s (and Law’s) Illusions in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale <p>Abstract:</p><p>Chaucer’s story of Arveragus and Dorigen is filled with illusions. Through the machinations of an illusionist, a tregetour, Aurelius secures by false means his right to sleep with Dorigen. But the illusion that begins the story is that of dual sovereignty and freedom in the marriage of Dorigen and Arveragus. Because they violate a longstanding code of separating courtly love from marriage, violating the intent of the marriage vow, everything turns into illusion, because the marriage is based upon fraudulent claims that undermine sacrosanct rules of marital decorum. The couple overturns the social order, engendering a series of natural disorders that can be righted only by the reimposition of male authority in the marriage. Order is restored, however, at the expense of intent. That is, Dorigen never intended to act on her promise to sleep with Aurelius in exchange for the rock removal. The text explicitly states this, even though Aurelius deliberately (maliciously?) treats her words as if they expressed true intent. In the <i>Franklin’s Tale</i>, Chaucer’s central examination of illusion probes the nascent area of legal debate over <i>mens rea</i>, the privileging of motive or intent over act, articulated by English jurist Henry de Bracton’s mid-thirteenth century <i>De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae</i>. This essay will not only examine the illusion of the marriage but also connect it to the equally illusory claim that Dorigen’s hasty promise to Aurelius carries as much weight as her marriage vow or of any consciously worded statement where word and intent match. Finally, the mercy shown to Dorigen will be assessed, not as the generous solution to Dorigen’s waywardness but as an illusion that, like the law, pardons, but never exonerates, Dorigen and her unintended words.</p> http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Studies in Philology University of North Carolina Press

Love’s (and Law’s) Illusions in Chaucer’s Franklin’s Tale

Caldwell, Ellen M.
Studies in Philology , Volume 116 (2) – Apr 3, 2019
Download PDF
18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/love-s-and-law-s-illusions-in-chaucer-s-franklin-s-tale-EVDbDr07sW

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © The University of North Carolina Press.
ISSN
1543-0383

Abstract

<p>Abstract:</p><p>Chaucer’s story of Arveragus and Dorigen is filled with illusions. Through the machinations of an illusionist, a tregetour, Aurelius secures by false means his right to sleep with Dorigen. But the illusion that begins the story is that of dual sovereignty and freedom in the marriage of Dorigen and Arveragus. Because they violate a longstanding code of separating courtly love from marriage, violating the intent of the marriage vow, everything turns into illusion, because the marriage is based upon fraudulent claims that undermine sacrosanct rules of marital decorum. The couple overturns the social order, engendering a series of natural disorders that can be righted only by the reimposition of male authority in the marriage. Order is restored, however, at the expense of intent. That is, Dorigen never intended to act on her promise to sleep with Aurelius in exchange for the rock removal. The text explicitly states this, even though Aurelius deliberately (maliciously?) treats her words as if they expressed true intent. In the <i>Franklin’s Tale</i>, Chaucer’s central examination of illusion probes the nascent area of legal debate over <i>mens rea</i>, the privileging of motive or intent over act, articulated by English jurist Henry de Bracton’s mid-thirteenth century <i>De Legibus et Consuetudinibus Angliae</i>. This essay will not only examine the illusion of the marriage but also connect it to the equally illusory claim that Dorigen’s hasty promise to Aurelius carries as much weight as her marriage vow or of any consciously worded statement where word and intent match. Finally, the mercy shown to Dorigen will be assessed, not as the generous solution to Dorigen’s waywardness but as an illusion that, like the law, pardons, but never exonerates, Dorigen and her unintended words.</p>

Journal

Studies in Philology – University of North Carolina Press

Published: Apr 3, 2019

There are no references for this article.