Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
SC 8.1-Letters 2/11/02 3:17 PM Page 1 ........................................ Capital “S” Not Required—Since 1861 When compiling our “Letters to the Editors” we typically go leafing through the previous few weeks’ worth of mail to find the best to print for our audience. We begin filled with hope and good will. Usually, we look first for those notes that have been signed and addressed, if for no other reason than to make sure that at least some of the readers kind enough to take the time to write us get a little recognition. However, much of the material we receive comes without signature. We’ve found that there’s no real rhyme or reason to what will provoke our readers to write us with or without a John Hancock. And although it’s against editorial policy at many publications to print anonymous letters, we’d hate to deny our readers these flashes of color. As you’ll see from the letters below, we’ve managed to do a good job of irritating some of you. Apparently, for a few people we’ve become something like your grade-school best friend’s little brother, poking your ribs just when you’ve gotten a little comfortable or turning
Southern Cultures – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Feb 1, 2002
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.