Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
RiChaRD a. GaRNeR From Sovereignty to Ethopoiesis Literature,Aesthetics,andNewFormsofLife There is a dilemma: either all these books are already contained within the Word and they must be burned, or they are contradictory and, again, they must be burned. Michel Foucault, "Language to Infinity" (100) The consensus of culture has to be opposed by the courage of art in its barbaric truth. Michel Foucault, The Courage of the Truth (189) If literature can be considered sovereign, it can only be in that singular, idiosyncratic conceptualization of sovereignty whose lineage can be traced to the work of Georges Bataille. "Only sacred, poetic words, limited to the level of impotent beauty, have retained the power to manifest full sovereignty," Bataille says, going on to equate sovereignty with a state of radical freedom (25). If literature is sovereign, it is because it insists on its autonomy from all other discourses, including interpretation. It is this vision of literature that is taken up at a certain moment in time--in a style where the concepts non-meaning, transgression, play, and sovereignty can all be linked together--by both Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida. Yet despite each one taking up and adopting this Bataillean association of literature and
The Comparatist – University of North Carolina Press
Published: May 19, 2012
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.