Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Dryden's "Cymon and Iphigenia": The "Vigour of the Worse" Prevailing

Dryden's "Cymon and Iphigenia": The "Vigour of the Worse" Prevailing by David Gelineau N the spring of 1698, Jeremy Collier published A Short View of the Immorality and Profaneness of the English Stage, sparking off a long and furious pamphlet controversy that involved many of England's most important contemporary literary figures. Most of those who were directly and ruthlessly attacked by Collier responded in kind. But one figure who seemed--to the contemporary scene as well as to later literary historians--largely muted in his response was John Dryden. This is certainly surprising; Dryden was more than capable of a spirited response, as his satires testify to. Furthermore, Dryden was the most sustained object of Collier's moralistic diatribe. The most common answer to this muted response has always been that Dryden felt chastened by Collier's arguments and did on occasion, with many qualifications, acknowledge their justness. But I think other reasons should be considered when assessing the nature of Dryden's response. First is the general prudence that Dryden felt he had to practice in an England where he was a political outcast, where Collier was so obviously applauded by those in power, and where even someone like Congreve, never the prop of the former political regime that Dryden had been, http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Studies in Philology University of North Carolina Press

Dryden's "Cymon and Iphigenia": The "Vigour of the Worse" Prevailing

Studies in Philology , Volume 102 (2) – Apr 4, 2005

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-north-carolina-press/dryden-s-cymon-and-iphigenia-the-vigour-of-the-worse-prevailing-gWYk1YFI0b

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of North Carolina Press
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by The University of North Carolina Press.
ISSN
1543-0383
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

by David Gelineau N the spring of 1698, Jeremy Collier published A Short View of the Immorality and Profaneness of the English Stage, sparking off a long and furious pamphlet controversy that involved many of England's most important contemporary literary figures. Most of those who were directly and ruthlessly attacked by Collier responded in kind. But one figure who seemed--to the contemporary scene as well as to later literary historians--largely muted in his response was John Dryden. This is certainly surprising; Dryden was more than capable of a spirited response, as his satires testify to. Furthermore, Dryden was the most sustained object of Collier's moralistic diatribe. The most common answer to this muted response has always been that Dryden felt chastened by Collier's arguments and did on occasion, with many qualifications, acknowledge their justness. But I think other reasons should be considered when assessing the nature of Dryden's response. First is the general prudence that Dryden felt he had to practice in an England where he was a political outcast, where Collier was so obviously applauded by those in power, and where even someone like Congreve, never the prop of the former political regime that Dryden had been,

Journal

Studies in PhilologyUniversity of North Carolina Press

Published: Apr 4, 2005

There are no references for this article.