Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Dorothy M. Figueira Comparative Literature Where We Started and What We Have Become I would r fi st like to thank the conference organizers and Kathy Komar for allowing colleagues to address you today. Many of you may be unaware that me and my i Cl a it was the a Cl a that contributed to the establishment of the i Cl a some ftfiy years ago. We in the International Association owe much to our American colleagues. It was, therefore, a great honor to convene this forum at your annual meeting. I would like to preface this discussion with some anecdotal background thoughts on the state of the discipline of Comparative Literature before I turn the podium over to my colleagues who have come to discuss with you the state of Comparative Litera- ture in their respective countries. I came to the study of Comparative Literature very late in my student career, ae ft r considerable graduate work in theology and classical religions. I was able to segue into a new discipline because I had good linguistic training as an historian of religions. e Th se were the days when one studied languages by studying literature (there was
The Comparatist – University of North Carolina Press
Published: May 24, 2008
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.