Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
James Dutton Archival Futures Michel Houellebecq’s Anthropocene One of the more fashionable recent ways to interpret t che s alle o- d An thropocene is to note how, in the words of Naomi Klein, “this changes everything”. Indeed, the Anthropocene hypothesis points out the irreversible change “human” behav- iour has had on the Earth System. The remarkable interdisciplinary influence of the hypothesis demonstrates the possibilities such change opens up for critical thought—and signifies the academy’s sense of responsibility in navigating these changes toward the best possible future. But the very premise of an irre versible change upsets this logic; such a fixation with change ignores a more present pre- dicament. The mark left by human cultures on the earth remains—and indeed, the great, oen r ft epressed trauma of the Anthropocene is that this scar wi ch lang l not e. What is most interesting to note is that the peculiar temporalities opened up by the Anthropocene hypothesis are not only not unprecedented but, in many re- spects, are those that form the basis of the archival cultures that have set the meta- physical tone for scientific enquiry arguably since the Reformation. At any rate, this archival obsession has
The Comparatist – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Nov 11, 2021
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.