Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Christopher Breu After the Event Toward a Post- Capitalist Conception of Structure and Habit on the Limits of the event Habit, Structure, Event: recent theory would privilege the later concept over the former two. As concepts, habit and structure suggest fixity, rigidity, inattentive- ness, unconsciousness—certainly not the stuff of which radical political tra - nsfor mation is usually made. If anything, habit and structure are typically understood to be akin to ideology. Thus, Pierre Bourdieu articulates his concept of habitus as an embodied conception of ideology in which a person’s class position is marked by a series of unconscious dispositions, habits, and beliefs. Similarly, Althusser in- vokes the idea of structure to theorize the workings of capitalism and the repro- duction of its conditions of production. Event, as a concept, on the other hand is transformational, sexy, revolutionary. It is the unpredictable, the new, the contin- gent, that which gives us hope in the face of capitalism’s overwhelming systema- ticity. Certainly this is how the concept has functioned in the work of Alain Badiou and Slavoj Žižek. 1 Yet, what are the conceptual limitations that structure the con- cept of the event itself? What if its alterity to all
The Comparatist – University of North Carolina Press
Published: Nov 11, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.