Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Bearer of This Letter: Language Ideologies, Literacy Practices, and the Fort Belknap Indian Community (review)

The Bearer of This Letter: Language Ideologies, Literacy Practices, and the Fort Belknap Indian... 2011 BOOK REVIEWS 385 In conclusion, Galloway’s dictionary is a rich and comprehensive study of the language based on very extensive example sets. It has an innovative structure that makes us think about dictionary organization in a fundamental way, and, that, most importantly, is always designed with the worthy goal of helping us to see the language on its own terms. To close this review, I have asked Elizabeth Phillips, to my knowledge the last living person to have spoken UH from childhood–and someone who also regularly uses Galloway’s dictionary in her work with the language–to comment on the dic- tionary. She says “Siyám smelá:lh Lawéchten, tset mékw’ shxwóxweches xwela tl’léwe wiyáth o. Skw’á:y cha kw’es melqláme wiyóth cha kw’es ite sqwáleweltset.” Which means (as I was able to check with the dictionary itself): ‘Dr. Galloway, we all raise our hands up to you. We will never forget you, you will always be in our hearts.’ References Kuipers, Aert H. 1967 The Squamish Language: Grammar, Texts, Dictionary. The Hague: Mouton. 1969 The Squamish Language: Grammar, Texts, Dictionary. Part 2. The Hague: Mouton. Thompson, Laurence C., and M. Terry Thompson 1996 Thompson River Salish Dictionary: nþ eºkepmxcín. University of Montana http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Anthropological Linguistics University of Nebraska Press

The Bearer of This Letter: Language Ideologies, Literacy Practices, and the Fort Belknap Indian Community (review)

Anthropological Linguistics , Volume 53 (4) – Sep 22, 2012

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-nebraska-press/the-bearer-of-this-letter-language-ideologies-literacy-practices-and-4LXl7zg0cL

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of Nebraska Press
ISSN
1944-6527

Abstract

2011 BOOK REVIEWS 385 In conclusion, Galloway’s dictionary is a rich and comprehensive study of the language based on very extensive example sets. It has an innovative structure that makes us think about dictionary organization in a fundamental way, and, that, most importantly, is always designed with the worthy goal of helping us to see the language on its own terms. To close this review, I have asked Elizabeth Phillips, to my knowledge the last living person to have spoken UH from childhood–and someone who also regularly uses Galloway’s dictionary in her work with the language–to comment on the dic- tionary. She says “Siyám smelá:lh Lawéchten, tset mékw’ shxwóxweches xwela tl’léwe wiyáth o. Skw’á:y cha kw’es melqláme wiyóth cha kw’es ite sqwáleweltset.” Which means (as I was able to check with the dictionary itself): ‘Dr. Galloway, we all raise our hands up to you. We will never forget you, you will always be in our hearts.’ References Kuipers, Aert H. 1967 The Squamish Language: Grammar, Texts, Dictionary. The Hague: Mouton. 1969 The Squamish Language: Grammar, Texts, Dictionary. Part 2. The Hague: Mouton. Thompson, Laurence C., and M. Terry Thompson 1996 Thompson River Salish Dictionary: nþ eºkepmxcín. University of Montana

Journal

Anthropological LinguisticsUniversity of Nebraska Press

Published: Sep 22, 2012

There are no references for this article.