Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Corrington's Ecstatic Naturalism in Light of the Scientific Study of Religion

Corrington's Ecstatic Naturalism in Light of the Scientific Study of Religion Corrington’s Ecstatic Naturalism in Light of the Scientific Study of Religion Wesley J. Wildman / b oston u niversity and the i nstitute for the b io-c ultural s tudy of r eligion I. Introduction obert s . c orrington has misgivings about the use of the word “natu- ralism” to describe his view of reality; in fact, more recently he has r been using “deep pantheism” and variants. n evertheless, “naturalism” remains an apt word, conjuring the creative depths of the world around us, and we should continue to use it to describe c orrington’s philosophical-theological system—without unduly apologizing for its inevitably circular semantic con- tent, and despite the risk that his view might be known by its name instead of its content. The variant of naturalism for which c orrington is so well known is called (by him) ecstatic naturalism, and he has shown it to be an important version of religiously and axiologically nonreductive naturalism. c orrington’s view deserves careful analysis and evaluation in light of many fields , including the scientific study of religion, with which it has not been in extensive dialogue to this point. While the scientific study of religion does not have http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png American Journal of Theology & Philosophy University of Illinois Press

Corrington's Ecstatic Naturalism in Light of the Scientific Study of Religion

Loading next page...
 
/lp/university-of-illinois-press/corrington-apos-s-ecstatic-naturalism-in-light-of-the-scientific-study-GwlwV0X0BG

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
University of Illinois Press
ISSN
2156-4795

Abstract

Corrington’s Ecstatic Naturalism in Light of the Scientific Study of Religion Wesley J. Wildman / b oston u niversity and the i nstitute for the b io-c ultural s tudy of r eligion I. Introduction obert s . c orrington has misgivings about the use of the word “natu- ralism” to describe his view of reality; in fact, more recently he has r been using “deep pantheism” and variants. n evertheless, “naturalism” remains an apt word, conjuring the creative depths of the world around us, and we should continue to use it to describe c orrington’s philosophical-theological system—without unduly apologizing for its inevitably circular semantic con- tent, and despite the risk that his view might be known by its name instead of its content. The variant of naturalism for which c orrington is so well known is called (by him) ecstatic naturalism, and he has shown it to be an important version of religiously and axiologically nonreductive naturalism. c orrington’s view deserves careful analysis and evaluation in light of many fields , including the scientific study of religion, with which it has not been in extensive dialogue to this point. While the scientific study of religion does not have

Journal

American Journal of Theology & PhilosophyUniversity of Illinois Press

Published: Mar 26, 2013

There are no references for this article.