Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.
Comments on George Allan’s “Neville’s Ontological Ultimate: A Bridge Too Far” r obert c ummings n eville / b oston u niversity eorge Allan, following s antayana following h omer, signals that we are in medias res, in the middle of things. i want to reflect on this in g two senses, being in the middle of several philosophical conversations and being in the middle of the cosmos. These come together in many ways regarding a third topic raised by Auxier as well as Allan, namely whether we can go beyond cosmology to metaphysics, or, how to conceive the bridge that might go too far. g eorge Allan and i have been friends and collaborators longer than i ’ve known anyone else here, including my wife. We were classmates at y ale study- ing Plato and Whitehead, among other things. Then for twenty-five years we were codirectors of the s ociety for s tudies of Process Philosophies, which we explicitly intended to be a counterbalance to the developing orthodoxy of what has become the c laremont school, with its c enter for Process s tudies, the journal Process Studies, and its rigorous missionary programs in the f ar e
American Journal of Theology & Philosophy – University of Illinois Press
Published: Feb 7, 2015
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.