Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
D. Hensher, J. Rose, W. Greene (2012)
Inferring attribute non-attendance from stated choice data: implications for willingness to pay estimates and a warning for stated choice experiment designTransportation, 39
A. Bergmann, S. Colombo, N. Hanley (2008)
Rural versus urban preferences for renewable energy developmentsEcological Economics, 65
R. Scarpa, S. Ferrini, K. Willis (2005)
Performance of Error Component Models for Status-Quo Effects in Choice Experiments
R. Hobbs, P. Wade, K. Shelden (2016)
Viability of a small, geographically-isolated population of beluga whale, Delphinapterus leucas: effects of hunting, predation, and mortality events in Cook Inlet, Alaska, 77
(2016)
Non-use Economic Values for Little-Known Aquatic Species at Risk: Comparing Choice Experiment Results from Surveys Focused on Species, Guilds, and EcosystemsEnvironmental Management, 58
E. Irwin, K. Bell, N. Bockstael, D. Newburn, M. Partridge, JunJie Wu (2009)
The Economics of Urban-Rural SpaceAnnual Review of Resource Economics, 1
K. Veisten, H. Hoen, J. Strand (2004)
Sequencing and the Adding-up Property in Contingent Valuation of Endangered Species: Are Contingent Non-Use Values Economic Values?Environmental and Resource Economics, 29
L. Richardson, J. Loomis (2009)
The total economic value of threatened, endangered and rare species: An updated meta-analysisEcological Economics, 68
S. Beggs, S. Cardell, J. Hausman (1981)
Assessing the potential demand for electric carsJournal of Econometrics, 17
G. Ericsson, G. Bostedt, J. Kindberg (2008)
Wolves as a Symbol of People's Willingness to Pay for Large Carnivore ConservationSociety & Natural Resources, 21
W. Freudenburg (1991)
Rural‐Urban Differences in Environmental Concern: A Closer Look*Sociological Inquiry, 61
Nicola Cornally (2015)
Theory of Planned Behavior
J. Swait, J. Louviere (1993)
The Role of the Scale Parameter in the Estimation and Comparison of Multinomial Logit ModelsJournal of Marketing Research, 30
(2016)
National Marine Fisheries Service, Alaska Regional Office, Protected Resources Division
M. Koetse (2017)
Effects of payment vehicle non-attendance in choice experiments on value estimates and the WTA–WTP disparityJournal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 6
R. Bandara, C. Tisdell (2002)
Comparison of rural and urban attitudes to the conservation of Asian elephants in Sri Lanka: empirical evidenceBiological Conservation, 110
Daniel Lew, K. Wallmo (2017)
Temporal stability of stated preferences for endangered species protection from choice experimentsEcological Economics, 131
P. Boxall, W. Adamowicz (2002)
Understanding Heterogeneous Preferences in Random Utility Models: A Latent Class ApproachEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 23
W. Greene, D. Hensher (2003)
A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: contrasts with mixed logitTransportation Research Part B-methodological, 37
L. Gerber, Manuela González‐Suárez (2010)
Population Viability Analysis: Origins and Contributions
P. Boxall, W. Adamowicz, M. Olar, G. West, G. Cantin (2012)
Analysis of the economic benefits associated with the recovery of threatened marine mammal species in the Canadian St. Lawrence EstuaryMarine Policy, 36
William Morris (2019)
Population Viability AnalysisEncyclopedia of Theoretical Ecology
R. Johnston, K. Boyle, W. Adamowicz, J. Bennett, R. Brouwer, T. Cameron, W. Hanemann, N. Hanley, M. Ryan, R. Scarpa, R. Tourangeau, Christian Vossler (2017)
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference StudiesJournal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4
Dr. Bartczak, Petr Mariel, Susan Chilton, J. Meyerhoff (2016)
The Impact of Latent Risk Preferences on Valuing the Preservation of Threatened Lynx Populations in PolandSRPN: Other Food Industry (Topic)
James Yoo, R. Ready (2014)
Preference heterogeneity for renewable energy technologyEnergy Economics, 42
W. Adamowicz, P. Boxall, Michael Williams, J. Louviere (1998)
Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent ValuationEconometric Modeling: Agriculture
Daniel Lew, D. Layton, R. Rowe (2010)
Valuing Enhancements to Endangered Species Protection under Alternative Baseline Futures: The Case of the Steller Sea Lion, 25
K. Tiller, P. Jakus, W. Park (1997)
Household Willingness to Pay for Dropoff RecyclingJournal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 22
S. Hess, A. Stathopoulos, D. Campbell, Vikki O’Neill, Sebastian Caussade (2013)
It’s not that I don’t care, I just don’t care very much: confounding between attribute non-attendance and taste heterogeneityTransportation, 40
(2000)
“ Urban Rural Unity Study
J. Berenguer, J. Corraliza, Rocío Martín (2005)
Rural-Urban Differences in Environmental Concern, Attitudes, and ActionsEuropean Journal of Psychological Assessment, 21
J. Whitehead (1992)
Ex ante willingness to pay with supply and demand uncertainty: implications for valuing a sea turtle protection programmeApplied Economics, 24
(2017)
Isolated: Will Life Get Better for Rural Alaskans?” https://harvardpolitics.com/covers /isolated-will-life-get-better-for-rural-alaskans
Randall Chapaaan, R. Staelin (1982)
Exploiting Rank Ordered Choice Set Data within the Stochastic Utility ModelJournal of Marketing Research, 19
D. Reaves, R. Kramer, T. Holmes (1999)
Does Question Format Matter? Valuing an Endangered SpeciesEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 14
Daniel Lew (2015)
Willingness to pay for threatened and endangered marine species: a review of the literature and prospects for policy useFrontiers in Marine Science, 2
J. Whitehead, T. Haab, Ju-Chin Huang (2011)
Preference data for environmental valuation: combining revealed and stated approaches.
M. Wakamatsu, K. Shin, Clevo Wilson, Shunsuke Managi (2018)
Exploring a Gap between Australia and Japan in the Economic Valuation of Whale ConservationEcological Economics, 146
K. Wallmo, Daniel Lew (2016)
A comparison of regional and national values for recovering threatened and endangered marine species in the United States.Journal of environmental management, 179
R. Cummings, Laura Taylor (1999)
Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation MethodThe American Economic Review, 89
Florian Heiss (2016)
Discrete Choice Methods with SimulationEconometric Reviews, 35
J. Shogren, J. Tschirhart, Terry Anderson, Amy Ando, S. Beissinger, David Brookshire, Gardner Brown, Don Coursey, Robert Innes, Stephen Meyer, S. Polasky (1998)
On the Use of Demographic Models of Population Viability in Endangered Species ManagementJournal of Wildlife Management, 62
M. Thiene, R. Scarpa, J. Louviere (2015)
Addressing Preference Heterogeneity, Multiple Scales and Attribute Attendance with a Correlated Finite Mixing Model of Tap Water ChoiceEnvironmental and Resource Economics, 62
I. Krinsky, A. Robb (1986)
On Approximating the Statistical Properties of ElasticitiesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 68
R. Johnston, D. Jarvis, K. Wallmo, Daniel Lew (2015)
Multiscale Spatial Pattern in Nonuse Willingness to Pay: Applications to Threatened and Endangered Marine SpeciesLand Economics, 91
Henrik Lindhjem, Tran Tuan (2011)
Valuation of species and nature conservation in Asia and Oceania: a meta-analysisEnvironmental Economics and Policy Studies, 14
C. Bhat (2003)
Simulation estimation of mixed discrete choice models using randomized and scrambled Halton sequencesTransportation Research Part B-methodological, 37
R. Scarpa, Timothy Gilbride, D. Campbell, D. Hensher (2009)
Modelling attribute non-attendance in choice experiments for rural landscape valuationEuropean Review of Agricultural Economics, 36
D. Campbell, D. Hensher, R. Scarpa (2011)
Non-attendance to attributes in environmental choice analysis: a latent class specificationJournal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54
J. Louviere, D. Hensher, J. Swait (2000)
Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications
(2011)
External Tests of Embedding and Scope in Stated Preference Choice Experiments: An Application to Endangered Species Valuation.
Gregory Poe, Kelly Giraud, J. Loomis (2005)
Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical DistributionsEconometric Modeling: Agriculture
R. Hobbs, D. Rugh, C. Sims, J. Waite, K. Shelden (2015)
Estimated abundance and trend in aerial counts of beluga whales, Delphinapterus leucas, in Cook Inlet, Alaska, 1994-2012, 77
D. Petrolia, Matthew Interis, Joonghyun Hwang (2018)
Single-Choice, Repeated-Choice, and Best-Worst Scaling Elicitation Formats: Do Results Differ and by How Much?Environmental and Resource Economics, 69
Place of Residence and Cost Attribute Non-Attendance | 243
Spatial variation of economic benefits associated with endangered species based on place of residence may be important to understand given conservation actions often place an unequal burden on rural and non-rural areas. In this article, place of residence differences are examined using split-sample stated preference choice experiment survey data from a study involving public preferences for protecting an endangered species, the Cook Inlet beluga whale. Standard mixed logit models provide evidence of a difference in estimated preference functions and willingness to pay (WTP) between households from rural and non-rural areas. However, when cost attribute non-attendance is accounted for, both rural and non-rural WTP estimates are scaled downward and differences in WTP dissipate.
Marine Resource Economics – University of Chicago Press
Published: Jul 1, 2019
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.