Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
REVIEW Review Speed Bumps RICHARD TARUSKIN The Cambridge History of Nineteenth-Century Music. Edited by Jim Samson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. xv, 772 pp. The Cambridge History of Twentieth-Century Music. Edited by Nicholas Cook and Anthony Pople. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. xviii, 818 pp. Preliminary disclaimer: Any attempt to review 1,623 pages containing the work of forty-six contributors must of course be invidiously selective. This review, driven by issues rather than content, will be more invidiously selective than usual. My apologies to the unmentioned; I certainly don't mean to imply that what is unmentioned is unmentionable. I Musicologists who have made their decision to let Theodor W. Adorno do their thinking for them take it as an axiom that, to quote Robert Walser, "social relations and struggles are enacted within music itself."1 Walser says we all should have learned this from Adorno long ago, but some of us, having been briefly beguiled by the notion, have concluded that it is hogwash. The "enactment" to which Walser refers in context is that of the "cultural politics" of Bach's music as interpreted by Susan McClary in what even McClary would probably now describe as one of her more extravagant
19th-Century Music – University of California Press
Published: Oct 1, 2005
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.