Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Rebecca Adler-Nissen, Charlotte Galpin, B. Rosamond (2017)
Performing Brexit: How a post-Brexit world is imagined outside the United KingdomThe British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 19
M. Lewis (2017)
'History Wars' and Reconciliation in Japan and Korea
N. Kapur (2018)
Japan at the Crossroads
T. Morris‐Suzuki (2013)
Remembering the unfinished conflict: Museums and the contested memory of the Korean War
Donald Zagoria, E. Vogel (1979)
Japan as number one
William Nester (1996)
Power across the Pacific
N. Deakin (1969)
The British Nationality Act of 1948: A brief study in the political mythology of race relationsRace & Class, 11
Claudia Astarita (2020)
The Trap of an Official Apology: the Power of Civil Society in Promoting ReconciliationEast Asia, 37
A national apology may assist in achieving reconciliation, cooperation, or forgiveness after past wrongs. However, the high hopes that are held for this role are more frequently dashed than fulfilled. Japan’s history of apologies is readily comparable to other nations’ attempts to correct past wrongs. The difficulties that many countries experience in their efforts to make meaningful apologies tend to undermine the power of the act itself. Individuals and small groups in civil society can further the progress of reconciliation through an apology and other actions. However, a nation cannot act as an individual or small group. Research shows that the pragmatic factors of commerce and trade, as well as the geopolitical context, can significantly suppress the remembrance of past wrongs, allowing past enemies to work cooperatively without confronting the past. This paper takes a deliberately broad exploratory approach to examine how pragmatic policies affect the impact and success of national apologies. It also cites a case where an alleged lack of apologies can be used in an effort to heighten threat perception. Such matters have become sharply relevant in January 2023, when the Chinese Ambassador to Australia, Xiao Qian, was reported as saying, ‘The Japanese government has not apologised … they don’t accept it’s wrong and … might repeat the history.’ However, this paper also suggests that while some wrongs, such as genocide, may never be forgiven, former enemies may be able to find common ground in the context of geopolitics and economic and cultural spheres.
Contemporary Japan – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 11, 2024
Keywords: International reconciliation; national apologies; Aboriginal Australians; moral agency of states
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.