Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Uniformity or polarization? The nuclear power debate in Japanese newspapers and political coalitions, 1973–2014

Uniformity or polarization? The nuclear power debate in Japanese newspapers and political... The image of Japanese mainstream media reporting is dominated by the institution of “press clubs”. Critical researchers argue that these restricted and institutionalized links between mainstream media and their sources lead to uniformity in media reporting. Other researchers contend that Japanese journalists play diverse roles and frame issues in diverse ways. These contrasting theses are explored through an analysis of three major newspaper's framing of nuclear power in article series (rensai). First, we construct a set of frames of the nuclear power issue out of materials from two political alliances: the pronuclear alliance (the so called “nuclear village”), and the antinuclear alliance. We apply and adapt these frames using a sample of newspaper article series from 1973 to 2014. The comparison shows that there are significant differences of reporting both between newspaper organizations as well as between different periods. Especially for the phase after 2011, reporting turns pronouncedly nuclear-skeptical in two newspapers. While not denying press club influence, the analysis cautions against mechanically applying a distinction between “insider” and “outsider” media and calls for new analytical categories to explain the substantial differences of framing between journalists of various “insider” media organizations. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Contemporary Japan Taylor & Francis

Uniformity or polarization? The nuclear power debate in Japanese newspapers and political coalitions, 1973–2014

Weiss, Tobias
Contemporary Japan , Volume 33 (1): 66 – Jan 2, 2021
Download PDF

Uniformity or polarization? The nuclear power debate in Japanese newspapers and political coalitions, 1973–2014

Abstract

The image of Japanese mainstream media reporting is dominated by the institution of “press clubs”. Critical researchers argue that these restricted and institutionalized links between mainstream media and their sources lead to uniformity in media reporting. Other researchers contend that Japanese journalists play diverse roles and frame issues in diverse ways. These contrasting theses are explored through an analysis of three major newspaper's framing of nuclear power in...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/uniformity-or-polarization-the-nuclear-power-debate-in-japanese-ByD06TnPZN
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2020 German Institute for Japanese Studies
ISSN
1869-2737
eISSN
1869-2729
DOI
10.1080/18692729.2020.1824647
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The image of Japanese mainstream media reporting is dominated by the institution of “press clubs”. Critical researchers argue that these restricted and institutionalized links between mainstream media and their sources lead to uniformity in media reporting. Other researchers contend that Japanese journalists play diverse roles and frame issues in diverse ways. These contrasting theses are explored through an analysis of three major newspaper's framing of nuclear power in article series (rensai). First, we construct a set of frames of the nuclear power issue out of materials from two political alliances: the pronuclear alliance (the so called “nuclear village”), and the antinuclear alliance. We apply and adapt these frames using a sample of newspaper article series from 1973 to 2014. The comparison shows that there are significant differences of reporting both between newspaper organizations as well as between different periods. Especially for the phase after 2011, reporting turns pronouncedly nuclear-skeptical in two newspapers. While not denying press club influence, the analysis cautions against mechanically applying a distinction between “insider” and “outsider” media and calls for new analytical categories to explain the substantial differences of framing between journalists of various “insider” media organizations.

Journal

Contemporary Japan – Taylor & Francis

Published: Jan 2, 2021

Keywords: Framing; press clubs; journalism; qualitative content analysis; Fukushima; nuclear power

References

  • The nuclear power debate after Fukushima: A text-mining analysis of Japanese newspapers
  • 1.1. Genshiryoku no sentakushi (1.1. The choices in nuclear power)
  • Interview: Mirai aru enerugī to shite wakaku yūshū na jinzai wo genshiryoku ni (Interview: Young and excellent human capital into nuclear power as the energy of the future)
  • Jūgatsu 26nichi ha Genshiryoku no Hi (October 26 is the Day of Nuclear Power)
  • Zadankai: Nihon no genshi no hi“ kyō seijinshiki, (Discussion: The nuclear flame becomes an adult today)
  • Takagi Jinzaburō: Kagaku ha kawaru. (Takagi Jinzaburō: Science is changing)
  • Shizen-enerugī: Hiromeru rippō isoge. (Natural energy: Hurry with the legislation for fostering it!)
  • Biotechnology in Switzerland
  • Sinking a bold foray into watchdog journalism in Japan
  • Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach
  • Multi-layer research design for analyses of journalism and media systems in the global age: Test case Japan
  • Sonbō no ki wo mukaeta shinbun (The newspapers have passed the turning point)
  • The nuclearization of language: Nuclear allergy as political metaphor
  • Genpatsu shinsai (Nuclear earthquake disaster)
  • Terebi Asahi ga Catalog House ‘Tsūhan Seikatsu’ no CM hōei wo kyohi shita koto ni taisuru kokumin no hannō (The reaction of the people against TV Asahi rejecting the airing of Catalog House’s Tsūhan Seikatsu CM)
  • Kagaku hōdō no kinō to kōzō (Structure and function of science news)
  • Genshiryoku kaihatsu riyō wo meguru media gidai, -jō (The media agenda regarding the development and use of nuclear energy (1))
  • Genshiryoku kaihatsu riyō wo meguru media gidai, -chū (The media agenda regarding the development and use of nuclear energy (2))
  • Genshiryoku kaihatsu riyō wo meguru media gidai, -ka (The media agenda regarding the development and use of nuclear energy (3))
  • Fukushima Daiichi genpatsu jiko igo no genshiryoku hōdō (Reporting on nuclear power after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear accident)
  • Mainichi Shinbun ga mō sugu Nikkei ni oikosareru. Chōmaiyomi no shūen (The Mainichi is soon going to be overtaken by the Nikkei. The end of Chōmaiyomi)
  • Referent pluralism: Mass media and politics in Japan
  • Nihon Marx-shugi ha naze ‘genshiryoku’ ni akogareta no ka (Why was Japanese Marxism attracted to ‘nuclear power’?)
  • Senzenkisha club ni taisuru sūryōteki bunseki. Nihon Shinbun Nenkan wo mochiite (Quantitative analysis of press clubs during the prewar period on the casis of Newspaper Yearbooks)
  • Japan’s Nuclear Village
  • Detarame darake no Hirose Takashi ‘Kiken na hanashi’ (“A dangerous thing” from Hirose Takashi is full of nonsense)
  • Genshiryoku hōdō ni miru media frame no hensen (Changing media frames on nuclear power)
  • Genpatsu hōdō ha daihon’ei happyō datta ka. (Were the news on the nuclear accident announcements from the imperial headquarters?)
  • Tōdai kōgakubu shusshinsha ga shuryū „genshiryokumura“ no hijōshiki. (The stupidity of the nuclear village, where Tokyo University Engineers are the majority)
  • Genshriyoku rikkoku keikaku (Plan for an established nuclear power nation)
  • Forging nationalism from pacifism and internationalism: A study of Asahi and Yomiuri’s New Year’s Day editorials, 1953–2005
  • Genshiryoku to Communication I (Nuclear energy and communication I)
  • Utsukushii chikyū kankyō wo mamoru tame ni ikimono jakusha ni shien wo
  • The press clubs of Japan
  • Nihon no naka no Kashiwazaki (Kashiwazaki in the middle of Japan)
  • Hidezō-san ni kiku Hidezō (Hidezō asking Mr. Hidezō)
  • Hantai haichō (Listening to the ‘anti’)
  • Jimoto no hito ga kakukaku shikajika (The local people think like this)