Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The nuclear power debate after Fukushima: a text-mining analysis of Japanese newspapers

The nuclear power debate after Fukushima: a text-mining analysis of Japanese newspapers AbstractThis paper analyzes the debate on nuclear power after the Fukushima accident by using a text-mining approach. Texts are taken from the editorial articles of five major Japanese newspapers, Asahi Shinbun, Mainichi Shinbun, Nikkei Shinbun, Sankei Shinbun and Yomiuri Shinbun. After elucidating their different views on nuclear power policy, including general issues such as radiation risks, renewable energy and lessons from the meltdown, the paper reveals two main strands of arguments. Newspapers in favor of denuclearization appeal to “democratic values.” They advocate public participation in decisions on future energy policy and criticize the closed-off administration of nuclear energy. Meanwhile, pro-nuclear newspapers adopt a “technological nationalistic” stance, claiming that denuclearization will weaken Japan’s superiority in the field of nuclear power technology. In other words, the debate about the nuclear power is not merely about energy supply, but also about the choices facing Japanese society over visions for the future after the events of Fukushima. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Contemporary Japan Taylor & Francis

The nuclear power debate after Fukushima: a text-mining analysis of Japanese newspapers

Contemporary Japan , Volume 27 (2): 22 – Jun 1, 2015

The nuclear power debate after Fukushima: a text-mining analysis of Japanese newspapers

Abstract

AbstractThis paper analyzes the debate on nuclear power after the Fukushima accident by using a text-mining approach. Texts are taken from the editorial articles of five major Japanese newspapers, Asahi Shinbun, Mainichi Shinbun, Nikkei Shinbun, Sankei Shinbun and Yomiuri Shinbun. After elucidating their different views on nuclear power policy, including general issues such as radiation risks, renewable energy and lessons from the meltdown, the paper reveals two main strands of arguments....
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/the-nuclear-power-debate-after-fukushima-a-text-mining-analysis-of-NUNTOgxIKt
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2015 The Author(s)
ISSN
1869-2737
eISSN
1869-2729
DOI
10.1515/cj-2015-0006
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThis paper analyzes the debate on nuclear power after the Fukushima accident by using a text-mining approach. Texts are taken from the editorial articles of five major Japanese newspapers, Asahi Shinbun, Mainichi Shinbun, Nikkei Shinbun, Sankei Shinbun and Yomiuri Shinbun. After elucidating their different views on nuclear power policy, including general issues such as radiation risks, renewable energy and lessons from the meltdown, the paper reveals two main strands of arguments. Newspapers in favor of denuclearization appeal to “democratic values.” They advocate public participation in decisions on future energy policy and criticize the closed-off administration of nuclear energy. Meanwhile, pro-nuclear newspapers adopt a “technological nationalistic” stance, claiming that denuclearization will weaken Japan’s superiority in the field of nuclear power technology. In other words, the debate about the nuclear power is not merely about energy supply, but also about the choices facing Japanese society over visions for the future after the events of Fukushima.

Journal

Contemporary JapanTaylor & Francis

Published: Jun 1, 2015

Keywords: nuclear power; Fukushima accident; Japanese newspapers; textmining; 原子力エネルギー; 福島一原事故; 日本の新聞; テキスト・マイニング

There are no references for this article.