Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The inter-individual relationship between training status and activity pattern during small-sided and full-sized games in professional male football players

The inter-individual relationship between training status and activity pattern during small-sided... Objectives: We analysed the inter-individual relationship between training status and activity pattern  in small-sided games (SSG) and full-sized games (FG).Methods: Fourteen Italian elite male senior football players were monitored during four training sessions incorporating SSG, and six FG, during the pre-season. Baseline measurements included, countermovement jump (CMJ), 5-m sprint time and Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 distance (YYIR1). Activity pattern was collected via 15-Hz global positioning system with 100-Hz accelerometer integrated.Results: Maximum accelerations (Accmax) and maximum decelerations (Decmax) showed moderate correlations (P < 0.05; r = 0.49 and 0.52) between SSG and FG. YYIR1 correlated with total distance covered (TD) in both SSG and FG (P < 0.05; r = 0.42 to 0.57) and with high-intensity distance (HIR) during FG (P < 0.05; r = 0.46 ± 0.38). CMJ showed positive correlations with TD, Accmax, Decmax, total accelerations (Acctot) and total decelerations (Dectot) during FG (P < 0.05; r = 0.40 ± 0.38, 0.41 ± 0.40, 0.46 ± 0.38, 0.65 ± 0.29, 0.57 ± 0.33). Multiple regression analysis revealed Decmax during SSG, as significant predictor of physical performance during FG, explaining a significant amount of variation in HIR, very-high speed running, Accmax and Decmax (P < 0.05; R2 = 0.49, 0.44, 0.26 and 0.49) during FG.Conclusions: SSG seems more effective to enhance muscular efforts occurring during FG, such as accelerations and decelerations, rather than speed patterns. Specifically, Decmax distance imposed during SSG was identified as the predictor of players’ movement patterns during FG. Thus, importance of eccentric strength (i.e. imposed when decelerating) to achieve football-specific fitness is emphasised. These findings may assist coaches and any football practitioners for pre-season programming. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Science and Medicine in Football Taylor & Francis

The inter-individual relationship between training status and activity pattern during small-sided and full-sized games in professional male football players

The inter-individual relationship between training status and activity pattern during small-sided and full-sized games in professional male football players

Science and Medicine in Football , Volume 2 (2): 8 – Apr 3, 2018

Abstract

Objectives: We analysed the inter-individual relationship between training status and activity pattern  in small-sided games (SSG) and full-sized games (FG).Methods: Fourteen Italian elite male senior football players were monitored during four training sessions incorporating SSG, and six FG, during the pre-season. Baseline measurements included, countermovement jump (CMJ), 5-m sprint time and Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 distance (YYIR1). Activity pattern was collected via 15-Hz global positioning system with 100-Hz accelerometer integrated.Results: Maximum accelerations (Accmax) and maximum decelerations (Decmax) showed moderate correlations (P < 0.05; r = 0.49 and 0.52) between SSG and FG. YYIR1 correlated with total distance covered (TD) in both SSG and FG (P < 0.05; r = 0.42 to 0.57) and with high-intensity distance (HIR) during FG (P < 0.05; r = 0.46 ± 0.38). CMJ showed positive correlations with TD, Accmax, Decmax, total accelerations (Acctot) and total decelerations (Dectot) during FG (P < 0.05; r = 0.40 ± 0.38, 0.41 ± 0.40, 0.46 ± 0.38, 0.65 ± 0.29, 0.57 ± 0.33). Multiple regression analysis revealed Decmax during SSG, as significant predictor of physical performance during FG, explaining a significant amount of variation in HIR, very-high speed running, Accmax and Decmax (P < 0.05; R2 = 0.49, 0.44, 0.26 and 0.49) during FG.Conclusions: SSG seems more effective to enhance muscular efforts occurring during FG, such as accelerations and decelerations, rather than speed patterns. Specifically, Decmax distance imposed during SSG was identified as the predictor of players’ movement patterns during FG. Thus, importance of eccentric strength (i.e. imposed when decelerating) to achieve football-specific fitness is emphasised. These findings may assist coaches and any football practitioners for pre-season programming.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/the-inter-individual-relationship-between-training-status-and-activity-IppesAlb7q

References (45)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
ISSN
2473-4446
eISSN
2473-3938
DOI
10.1080/24733938.2017.1414953
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Objectives: We analysed the inter-individual relationship between training status and activity pattern  in small-sided games (SSG) and full-sized games (FG).Methods: Fourteen Italian elite male senior football players were monitored during four training sessions incorporating SSG, and six FG, during the pre-season. Baseline measurements included, countermovement jump (CMJ), 5-m sprint time and Yo-Yo intermittent recovery test level 1 distance (YYIR1). Activity pattern was collected via 15-Hz global positioning system with 100-Hz accelerometer integrated.Results: Maximum accelerations (Accmax) and maximum decelerations (Decmax) showed moderate correlations (P < 0.05; r = 0.49 and 0.52) between SSG and FG. YYIR1 correlated with total distance covered (TD) in both SSG and FG (P < 0.05; r = 0.42 to 0.57) and with high-intensity distance (HIR) during FG (P < 0.05; r = 0.46 ± 0.38). CMJ showed positive correlations with TD, Accmax, Decmax, total accelerations (Acctot) and total decelerations (Dectot) during FG (P < 0.05; r = 0.40 ± 0.38, 0.41 ± 0.40, 0.46 ± 0.38, 0.65 ± 0.29, 0.57 ± 0.33). Multiple regression analysis revealed Decmax during SSG, as significant predictor of physical performance during FG, explaining a significant amount of variation in HIR, very-high speed running, Accmax and Decmax (P < 0.05; R2 = 0.49, 0.44, 0.26 and 0.49) during FG.Conclusions: SSG seems more effective to enhance muscular efforts occurring during FG, such as accelerations and decelerations, rather than speed patterns. Specifically, Decmax distance imposed during SSG was identified as the predictor of players’ movement patterns during FG. Thus, importance of eccentric strength (i.e. imposed when decelerating) to achieve football-specific fitness is emphasised. These findings may assist coaches and any football practitioners for pre-season programming.

Journal

Science and Medicine in FootballTaylor & Francis

Published: Apr 3, 2018

Keywords: acceleration; global positioning systems; team sports; performance; fitness; training load

There are no references for this article.