Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Execution of the GLC: A Policy Folly?

The Execution of the GLC: A Policy Folly? The Execution of the GLC: A Policy Folly? * D. B. O'LEARY POLICY FOLLY is a policy pursued contrary to the self-interest of the policymakers. It must meet three criteria. First, it must be perceived as counterproductive by at least some of its makers at its inception, not merely with the benefit of hindsight. Second, feasible alternative policies must be available. Third, the policy should be that of a group. The abolition of the GLC meets all three criteria. First, abolition was regarded as complex, time consuming and counterproductive by both Michael Heseltine and Tom King, Patrick Jenkin's predecessors at the Department of the Environment, and by William Whitelaw, chair of the cabinet committee MISC 79 which offered abolition as a 'sop' to Mrs Thatcher in compensation for failure to do something about the rates (Forrester et al., pp. 6+.-6). Second, feasible alternative policies were available. Ratecapping, expenditure limits and a propaganda offensive to defeat the Livingstone administra- tion in the GLC elections due for 1985 were feasible options, capable of achieving the government's objectives - presupposing, of course, that it had well defined objectives. Third, abolition has been stoutly defended by the cabinet, which has included Peter Walker http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The London Journal: A Review of Metropolitan Society Past and Present Taylor & Francis

The Execution of the GLC: A Policy Folly?

The Execution of the GLC: A Policy Folly?


Abstract

The Execution of the GLC: A Policy Folly? * D. B. O'LEARY POLICY FOLLY is a policy pursued contrary to the self-interest of the policymakers. It must meet three criteria. First, it must be perceived as counterproductive by at least some of its makers at its inception, not merely with the benefit of hindsight. Second, feasible alternative policies must be available. Third, the policy should be that of a group. The abolition of the GLC meets all three criteria. First, abolition was regarded as complex, time consuming and counterproductive by both Michael Heseltine and Tom King, Patrick Jenkin's predecessors at the Department of the Environment, and by William Whitelaw, chair of the cabinet committee MISC 79 which offered abolition as a 'sop' to Mrs Thatcher in compensation for failure to do something about the rates (Forrester et al., pp. 6+.-6). Second, feasible alternative policies were available. Ratecapping, expenditure limits and a propaganda offensive to defeat the Livingstone administra- tion in the GLC elections due for 1985 were feasible options, capable of achieving the government's objectives - presupposing, of course, that it had well defined objectives. Third, abolition has been stoutly defended by the cabinet, which has included Peter Walker

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/the-execution-of-the-glc-a-policy-folly-07Uk3Dph15

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 1985 Maney Publishing
ISSN
1749-6322
eISSN
0305-8034
DOI
10.1179/ldn.1985.11.2.176
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

The Execution of the GLC: A Policy Folly? * D. B. O'LEARY POLICY FOLLY is a policy pursued contrary to the self-interest of the policymakers. It must meet three criteria. First, it must be perceived as counterproductive by at least some of its makers at its inception, not merely with the benefit of hindsight. Second, feasible alternative policies must be available. Third, the policy should be that of a group. The abolition of the GLC meets all three criteria. First, abolition was regarded as complex, time consuming and counterproductive by both Michael Heseltine and Tom King, Patrick Jenkin's predecessors at the Department of the Environment, and by William Whitelaw, chair of the cabinet committee MISC 79 which offered abolition as a 'sop' to Mrs Thatcher in compensation for failure to do something about the rates (Forrester et al., pp. 6+.-6). Second, feasible alternative policies were available. Ratecapping, expenditure limits and a propaganda offensive to defeat the Livingstone administra- tion in the GLC elections due for 1985 were feasible options, capable of achieving the government's objectives - presupposing, of course, that it had well defined objectives. Third, abolition has been stoutly defended by the cabinet, which has included Peter Walker

Journal

The London Journal: A Review of Metropolitan Society Past and PresentTaylor & Francis

Published: Nov 1, 1985

There are no references for this article.