Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The Distribution of REIT Liquidity

The Distribution of REIT Liquidity In this study, we examine the distribution of market liquidity for a broad sample of real estate investment trusts (REITs). While prior research has focused on the average liquidity of REITs, we extend our analysis to include both the variability and skewness of liquidity, both of which have important implications. Excess variability in liquidity could present future uncertainty about the level of liquidity for REIT investors, which could impact returns as well as the efficacy of investment management. Increased skewness of liquidity is indicative of increased competition among market makers, which can result in better functioning financial markets. Our multivariate tests show that, consistent with the literature, average bid-ask spreads are higher for REITs than for non-REITs. We also find that the variability of bid-ask spreads is larger for REITs than for non-REITs and that the skewness of REIT bid-ask spreads has not only increased across time, but has also increased at a greater rate than the skewness of non-REIT spreads. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Real Estate Literature Taylor & Francis

The Distribution of REIT Liquidity

The Distribution of REIT Liquidity

Journal of Real Estate Literature , Volume 23 (2): 20 – Jan 1, 2015

Abstract

In this study, we examine the distribution of market liquidity for a broad sample of real estate investment trusts (REITs). While prior research has focused on the average liquidity of REITs, we extend our analysis to include both the variability and skewness of liquidity, both of which have important implications. Excess variability in liquidity could present future uncertainty about the level of liquidity for REIT investors, which could impact returns as well as the efficacy of investment management. Increased skewness of liquidity is indicative of increased competition among market makers, which can result in better functioning financial markets. Our multivariate tests show that, consistent with the literature, average bid-ask spreads are higher for REITs than for non-REITs. We also find that the variability of bid-ask spreads is larger for REITs than for non-REITs and that the skewness of REIT bid-ask spreads has not only increased across time, but has also increased at a greater rate than the skewness of non-REIT spreads.

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/the-distribution-of-reit-liquidity-sG0rvU9Mkr

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2015 American Real Estate Society
ISSN
1573-8809
DOI
10.1080/10835547.2015.12090405
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

In this study, we examine the distribution of market liquidity for a broad sample of real estate investment trusts (REITs). While prior research has focused on the average liquidity of REITs, we extend our analysis to include both the variability and skewness of liquidity, both of which have important implications. Excess variability in liquidity could present future uncertainty about the level of liquidity for REIT investors, which could impact returns as well as the efficacy of investment management. Increased skewness of liquidity is indicative of increased competition among market makers, which can result in better functioning financial markets. Our multivariate tests show that, consistent with the literature, average bid-ask spreads are higher for REITs than for non-REITs. We also find that the variability of bid-ask spreads is larger for REITs than for non-REITs and that the skewness of REIT bid-ask spreads has not only increased across time, but has also increased at a greater rate than the skewness of non-REIT spreads.

Journal

Journal of Real Estate LiteratureTaylor & Francis

Published: Jan 1, 2015

There are no references for this article.