Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

The 'Revolution' in the Manufacture of Ready-made Clothing 1840–60

The 'Revolution' in the Manufacture of Ready-made Clothing 1840–60 AbstractThe development of the ready-made clothing industry has been assumed to be a consequence of the invention of the sewing machine in the 1850s, and the spread of multiple retailing to follow from that. This article focuses on the innovating entrepreneurs in this branch of the textile industry, Elias Moses & Son of Aldgate, London, to show how mass-marketing of men's wear grew vigorously during the previous decade. The firm's enterprise was presaged by some external developments in the early decades of the nineteenth century, notably the standardisation of tailors' cutting systems, the decline in cloth prices with the rise of cut-price drapers, growing demand for basic clothing for the forces, emigrants and institutional uniforms, badly-paid immigrant workers and rising real incomes of the population at large.These favourable circumstances allowed the innovators to prosper on low labour costs, high turnover linked to long runs and modest margins, and all the razzmatazz of high-pressure selling, above all saturation of the market with advertising material and spectacular buildings and displays. It appears that quality was maintained within the segmented production lines and that Moses and several of their rivals sold wholesale as well as retail. Moses were quickly copied not only in London but also in a number of provincial cities.Elias Moses was sure that his enterprise amounted to a revolution in the clothing industry and in conclusion his claim is examined as an historical proposition. Jewish entrepreneurs were more willing to break the mould of long-established restrictive practices in the London industry. The economies introduced by the sewing machine were much less significant than has been assumed because sewing was only a small part of production costs. The larger cost was marketing, which Moses reduced before proceeding to the new technology. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png The London Journal: A Review of Metropolitan Society Past and Present Taylor & Francis

The 'Revolution' in the Manufacture of Ready-made Clothing 1840–60

18 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/the-apos-revolution-apos-in-the-manufacture-of-ready-made-clothing-3vEly4NdKc

References (40)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2004 Maney Publishing
ISSN
1749-6322
eISSN
0305-8034
DOI
10.1179/ldn.2004.29.1.44
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractThe development of the ready-made clothing industry has been assumed to be a consequence of the invention of the sewing machine in the 1850s, and the spread of multiple retailing to follow from that. This article focuses on the innovating entrepreneurs in this branch of the textile industry, Elias Moses & Son of Aldgate, London, to show how mass-marketing of men's wear grew vigorously during the previous decade. The firm's enterprise was presaged by some external developments in the early decades of the nineteenth century, notably the standardisation of tailors' cutting systems, the decline in cloth prices with the rise of cut-price drapers, growing demand for basic clothing for the forces, emigrants and institutional uniforms, badly-paid immigrant workers and rising real incomes of the population at large.These favourable circumstances allowed the innovators to prosper on low labour costs, high turnover linked to long runs and modest margins, and all the razzmatazz of high-pressure selling, above all saturation of the market with advertising material and spectacular buildings and displays. It appears that quality was maintained within the segmented production lines and that Moses and several of their rivals sold wholesale as well as retail. Moses were quickly copied not only in London but also in a number of provincial cities.Elias Moses was sure that his enterprise amounted to a revolution in the clothing industry and in conclusion his claim is examined as an historical proposition. Jewish entrepreneurs were more willing to break the mould of long-established restrictive practices in the London industry. The economies introduced by the sewing machine were much less significant than has been assumed because sewing was only a small part of production costs. The larger cost was marketing, which Moses reduced before proceeding to the new technology.

Journal

The London Journal: A Review of Metropolitan Society Past and PresentTaylor & Francis

Published: May 1, 2004

There are no references for this article.