Abstract
AbstractIn this commentary, I suggest that non-visual perceptual modalities provide counterexamples to Seth’s claim that perceptual presence depends on counterfactual richness. Then I suggest a modification to Seth’s view that is not vulnerable to these counterexamples.
AbstractIn this commentary, I suggest that non-visual perceptual modalities provide counterexamples to Seth’s claim that perceptual presence depends on counterfactual richness. Then I suggest a modification to Seth’s view that is not vulnerable to these counterexamples.
Cognitive Neuroscience – Taylor & Francis
Published: Apr 3, 2014
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.