Localizing Rectus Muscle Insertions
Abstract
JOURNAL OF BINOCULAR VISION AND OCULAR MOTILITY 2022, VOL. 72, NO. 4, 197–198 https://doi.org/10.1080/2576117X.2022.2114309 Savleen Kaur, MS and Jaspreet Sukhija, MS Department of Ophthalmology, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India ARTICLE HISTORY Received 18 February 2022; Revised 28 June 2022; Accepted 10 August 2022 To the editor, on ASOCT were within 1–1.5 mm. This number is very We congratulate Mirmohammadsadeghi et al. for high, so what do the authors speculate about the reason their study on the use of ultrasound biomicroscopy for this variability? Could the authors tell us which (UBM) and the Anterior Segment Optical Coherence muscle (MR/LR) is being referred to when comparing Tomography (ASOCT) in a cohort of patients under- measurements between esotropia and exotropia. We going strabismus surgery. However, this is not the first presume the figure shown by the author was that of study comparing the UBM and ASOCT in locating primary surgery; and we would like to know how did muscle insertions. We have recently reported the feasi- the operators find the delineation of insertions in reo- bility and accuracy of determining the extraocular mus- perations? It is important to note that the utility of cle insertion distance from