Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

How does the brain encode epistemic reliability? Perceptual presence, phenomenal transparency, and counterfactual richness

How does the brain encode epistemic reliability? Perceptual presence, phenomenal transparency,... AbstractSeth develops a convincing and detailed internalist alternative to the sensorimotor-contingency theory of perceptual phenomenology. However, there are remaining conceptual problems due to a semantic ambiguity in the notion of “presence” and the idea of “subjective veridicality.” The current model should be integrated with the earlier idea that experiential “realness” and “mind-independence” are determined by the unavailability of earlier processing stages to attention. Counterfactual richness and attentional unavailability may both be indicators of the overall processing level currently achieved, a functional property that normally correlates with epistemic reliability. Perceptual presence as well as phenomenal transparency express epistemic reliability on the level of conscious processing. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Cognitive Neuroscience Taylor & Francis

How does the brain encode epistemic reliability? Perceptual presence, phenomenal transparency, and counterfactual richness

Cognitive Neuroscience , Volume 5 (2): 3 – Apr 3, 2014
3 pages

How does the brain encode epistemic reliability? Perceptual presence, phenomenal transparency, and counterfactual richness

Abstract

AbstractSeth develops a convincing and detailed internalist alternative to the sensorimotor-contingency theory of perceptual phenomenology. However, there are remaining conceptual problems due to a semantic ambiguity in the notion of “presence” and the idea of “subjective veridicality.” The current model should be integrated with the earlier idea that experiential “realness” and “mind-independence” are determined by the unavailability of earlier...
Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/how-does-the-brain-encode-epistemic-reliability-perceptual-presence-3AcnWt0RBA
Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2014 Taylor & Francis
ISSN
1758-8936
eISSN
1758-8928
DOI
10.1080/17588928.2014.905519
pmid
24702471
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

AbstractSeth develops a convincing and detailed internalist alternative to the sensorimotor-contingency theory of perceptual phenomenology. However, there are remaining conceptual problems due to a semantic ambiguity in the notion of “presence” and the idea of “subjective veridicality.” The current model should be integrated with the earlier idea that experiential “realness” and “mind-independence” are determined by the unavailability of earlier processing stages to attention. Counterfactual richness and attentional unavailability may both be indicators of the overall processing level currently achieved, a functional property that normally correlates with epistemic reliability. Perceptual presence as well as phenomenal transparency express epistemic reliability on the level of conscious processing.

Journal

Cognitive NeuroscienceTaylor & Francis

Published: Apr 3, 2014

References