Got Hurt for What You Paid? Revisiting Government Subsidy in the U.S. Mortgage Market
Abstract
Abstract Using a screening model with asymmetric information, I evaluate the positive and normative effects of the subsidized default insurance policy in the U.S. mortgage market. The model implies that the subsidy raises interest rates for eligible mortgages, which is contrary to conventional wisdom but is consistent with the empirical evidence in Zhao (2019). Moreover, the model implies that the subsidy hurts borrowers it was intended to help, as well as raises the aggregate mortgage...