Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
F. Krueger, K. McCabe, J. Moll, N. Kriegeskorte, R. Zahn, Maren Strenziok, A. Heinecke, J. Grafman (2007)
Neural correlates of trustProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104
M. Heinrichs, B. Dawans, G. Domes (2009)
Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behaviorFrontiers in Neuroendocrinology, 30
L. Somerville, T. Heatherton, W. Kelley (2006)
Anterior cingulate cortex responds differentially to expectancy violation and social rejectionNature Neuroscience, 9
Joyce Berg, J. Dickhaut, K. McCabe (1995)
Trust, Reciprocity, and Social HistoryGames and Economic Behavior, 10
J. Bracht, Nick Feltovich (2009)
Whatever you say, your reputation precedes you: Observation and cheap talk in the trust gameJournal of Public Economics, 93
M. Delgado, R. Frank, E. Phelps, E. Phelps (2005)
Perceptions of moral character modulate the neural systems of reward during the trust gameNature Neuroscience, 8
M. Kosfeld, M. Heinrichs, P. Zak, U. Fischbacher, E. Fehr (2005)
Oxytocin increases trust in humansNature, 435
B. King-Casas, Damon Tomlin, Cedric Anen, Colin Camerer, S. Quartz, P. Montague (2005)
Getting to Know You: Reputation and Trust in a Two-Person Economic ExchangeScience, 308
A. Todorov, L. Harris, S. Fiske (2006)
Toward socially inspired social neuroscienceBrain Research, 1079
E. Kross, T. Egner, K. Ochsner, J. Hirsch, G. Downey (2007)
Neural Dynamics of Rejection SensitivityJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19
K. Williams, Kristin Sommer (1997)
Social Ostracism by Coworkers: Does Rejection Lead to Loafing or Compensation?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23
N. Johnson (2008)
Cultures of Kindness : A Meta-Analysis of Trust Game Experiments
N. Eisenberger, Shelly Gable, Matthew Lieberman (2007)
Functional magnetic resonance imaging responses relate to differences in real-world social experience.Emotion, 7 4
(2010)
The endocrinology of exclusion: Rejection elicits motivationally tuned changes in progesterone
A. Carter‐Sowell, Zhansheng Chen, K. Williams (2008)
Ostracism increases social susceptibilitySocial Influence, 3
Arthur Aron, E. Aron, Danny Smollan (1992)
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closenessJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63
N. Eisenberger, Matthew Lieberman, K. Williams (2003)
Does Rejection Hurt? An fMRI Study of Social ExclusionScience, 302
Jon Maner, C. Dewall, R. Baumeister, M. Schaller (2007)
Does social exclusion motivate interpersonal reconnection? Resolving the "porcupine problem".Journal of personality and social psychology, 92 1
P. Rhodes (1975)
OstracismThe Classical Review, 25
B. Majolo, K. Ames, R. Brumpton, Rebecca Garratt, K. Hall, N. Wilson (2006)
Human friendship favours cooperation in the Iterated Prisoner's DilemmaBehaviour, 143
Jessica Lakin, T. Chartrand, R. Arkin (2008)
I Am Too Just Like YouPsychological Science, 19
Carrie Masten, N. Eisenberger, L. Borofsky, Jennifer Pfeifer, K. McNealy, J. Mazziotta, M. Dapretto (2009)
Neural correlates of social exclusion during adolescence: understanding the distress of peer rejection.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience, 4 2
Matthew Lieberman, N. Eisenberger (2009)
Pains and Pleasures of Social LifeScience, 323
Sharon Goto (1996)
To trust or not to trust: Situational and dispositional determinantsSocial Behavior and Personality, 24
K. Williams, Christopher Cheung, Wilma Choi (2000)
Cyberostracism: effects of being ignored over the Internet.Journal of personality and social psychology, 79 5
Being socially excluded is profoundly distressing. It is unknown whether exclusion renders victims vulnerable to manipulation or whether excluded individuals become more cautious about being exploited by, and less trusting of, the person who excluded them. We investigated this by testing how much participants trust people who have socially included or excluded them. Inclusion and exclusion were manipulated using Cyberball (a virtual ball game) and, after playing Cyberball, participants played trust games. In a Reputation group participants played trust games with players from Cyberball; in the No Reputation group, participants played with strangers. Inclusion/exclusion manipulation interacted with Group such that participants in the Reputation group trusted individuals who included them more than those who excluded them, whereas inclusion/exclusion made no difference to trust in the No-Reputation group. Our findings suggest that exclusion does not increase gullibility, but that reputation is transferred from a social to an economic setting so that social inclusion increases trust.
Cognitive Neuroscience – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 27, 2011
Keywords: Trust; Behavioral game theory; Trust game; Cyberball; Ostracism; Cooperative behavior; Prisoner's dilemma; Social exclusion; Social cognition; Social influence
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.