Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Editor’s essay: Thoughts on theory

Editor’s essay: Thoughts on theory JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH 2018, VOL. 30, NOS. 1–2, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1472726 EDITORIAL The primary purpose of the Journal of Public Relations Research, since its founding, has been to help create, test, refine, or expand theory in public relations. Since commencing my editorship of this journal (work year 2015, credit year 2016), I have come to the chagrined realization that our journal’s very purpose is misunderstood by some authors, reviewers, and readers, for whom the phrase “theory in public relations” may not be quite clear. What is theory? At the most basic level, a theory is an idea or an explanation about how things work. As such, theories might come from a variety of sources that tell us what we know; these methods of knowing originally were articulated as tenacity, authority, taste, and science (see Pierce, 1877), with the method of taste now referred to as the method of intuition (see Wimmer & Dominick, 2014). The point of scientific endeavors (including social scientificefforts, as might be found in public relations) is to offer a method of knowing that is grounded in being public, objective, empirical, systematic, cumulative, predictive, and self-correcting (cf. Wimmer & Dominick, 2014). According to Reynolds (2007), http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Journal of Public Relations Research Taylor & Francis

Editor’s essay: Thoughts on theory

Journal of Public Relations Research , Volume 30 (1-2): 4 – Mar 4, 2018

Editor’s essay: Thoughts on theory

Journal of Public Relations Research , Volume 30 (1-2): 4 – Mar 4, 2018

Abstract

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH 2018, VOL. 30, NOS. 1–2, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1472726 EDITORIAL The primary purpose of the Journal of Public Relations Research, since its founding, has been to help create, test, refine, or expand theory in public relations. Since commencing my editorship of this journal (work year 2015, credit year 2016), I have come to the chagrined realization that our journal’s very purpose is misunderstood by some authors, reviewers, and readers, for whom the phrase “theory in public relations” may not be quite clear. What is theory? At the most basic level, a theory is an idea or an explanation about how things work. As such, theories might come from a variety of sources that tell us what we know; these methods of knowing originally were articulated as tenacity, authority, taste, and science (see Pierce, 1877), with the method of taste now referred to as the method of intuition (see Wimmer & Dominick, 2014). The point of scientific endeavors (including social scientificefforts, as might be found in public relations) is to offer a method of knowing that is grounded in being public, objective, empirical, systematic, cumulative, predictive, and self-correcting (cf. Wimmer & Dominick, 2014). According to Reynolds (2007),

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/editor-s-essay-thoughts-on-theory-VKEdk30n9e

References (17)

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
© 2018 Taylor & Francis
ISSN
1532-754X
eISSN
1062-726X
DOI
10.1080/1062726X.2018.1472726
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

JOURNAL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS RESEARCH 2018, VOL. 30, NOS. 1–2, 1–4 https://doi.org/10.1080/1062726X.2018.1472726 EDITORIAL The primary purpose of the Journal of Public Relations Research, since its founding, has been to help create, test, refine, or expand theory in public relations. Since commencing my editorship of this journal (work year 2015, credit year 2016), I have come to the chagrined realization that our journal’s very purpose is misunderstood by some authors, reviewers, and readers, for whom the phrase “theory in public relations” may not be quite clear. What is theory? At the most basic level, a theory is an idea or an explanation about how things work. As such, theories might come from a variety of sources that tell us what we know; these methods of knowing originally were articulated as tenacity, authority, taste, and science (see Pierce, 1877), with the method of taste now referred to as the method of intuition (see Wimmer & Dominick, 2014). The point of scientific endeavors (including social scientificefforts, as might be found in public relations) is to offer a method of knowing that is grounded in being public, objective, empirical, systematic, cumulative, predictive, and self-correcting (cf. Wimmer & Dominick, 2014). According to Reynolds (2007),

Journal

Journal of Public Relations ResearchTaylor & Francis

Published: Mar 4, 2018

There are no references for this article.