Get 20M+ Full-Text Papers For Less Than $1.50/day. Start a 14-Day Trial for You or Your Team.

Learn More →

Development of reasoning: Behavioral evidence to support reinforcement over cognitive control accounts

Development of reasoning: Behavioral evidence to support reinforcement over cognitive control... Abstract Speed's theory makes two predictions for the development of analogical reasoning. Firstly, young children should not be able to reason analogically due to an undeveloped PFC neural network. Secondly, category knowledge enables the reinforcement of structural features over surface features, and thus the development of sophisticated, analogical, reasoning. We outline existing studies that support these predictions and highlight some critical remaining issues. Specifically, we argue that the development of inhibition must be directly compared alongside the development of reasoning strategies in order to support Speed's account. http://www.deepdyve.com/assets/images/DeepDyve-Logo-lg.png Cognitive Neuroscience Taylor & Francis

Development of reasoning: Behavioral evidence to support reinforcement over cognitive control accounts

Cognitive Neuroscience , Volume 1 (2): 2 – Jun 2, 2010
27 pages

Loading next page...
 
/lp/taylor-francis/development-of-reasoning-behavioral-evidence-to-support-reinforcement-BpuwNTaNDD

References

References for this paper are not available at this time. We will be adding them shortly, thank you for your patience.

Publisher
Taylor & Francis
Copyright
Copyright 2010 Psychology Press, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business
ISSN
1758-8936
eISSN
1758-8928
DOI
10.1080/17588921003786598
pmid
24168281
Publisher site
See Article on Publisher Site

Abstract

Abstract Speed's theory makes two predictions for the development of analogical reasoning. Firstly, young children should not be able to reason analogically due to an undeveloped PFC neural network. Secondly, category knowledge enables the reinforcement of structural features over surface features, and thus the development of sophisticated, analogical, reasoning. We outline existing studies that support these predictions and highlight some critical remaining issues. Specifically, we argue that the development of inhibition must be directly compared alongside the development of reasoning strategies in order to support Speed's account.

Journal

Cognitive NeuroscienceTaylor & Francis

Published: Jun 2, 2010

There are no references for this article.