Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
S. Tormey (2021)
Populism and Liberal Democracy: A Comparative and Theoretical Analysis. By Takis S. Pappas. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019. 336p. $93.00 cloth.Perspectives on Politics
R. Kelemen (2019)
The European Union's authoritarian equilibriumJournal of European Public Policy, 27
The liberal party NEOS is an exception, as there is no traditional liberal party in Austria
Seán Hanley (2008)
Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe.
(2022)
2022), Party press releases
Judith Ross (2002)
Book Review: The Evolution of Green PoliticsEnvironmental Law Review, 7
L. Hooghe, G. Marks (2005)
A Postfunctionalist theory of European integration
Michael Boss (1974)
Economic theory of democracyPublic Choice, 19
Theresa Gessler, Sophia Hunger (2021)
How the refugee crisis and radical right parties shape party competition on immigrationPolitical Science Research and Methods, 10
A1 – Figure A3
Martin Haselmayer, Markus Wagner, Thomas Meyer (2017)
Partisan Bias in Message Selection: Media Gatekeeping of Party Press ReleasesPolitical Communication, 34
K. Benoit, Kohei Watanabe, Haiyan Wang, P. Nulty, Adam Obeng, Stefan Müller, Akitaka Matsuo (2018)
quanteda: An R package for the quantitative analysis of textual dataJ. Open Source Softw., 3
Catherine Tilton, Judith Markowitz, Y. Seto (2009)
Robustness Test
Kohei Watanabe (2020)
Latent Semantic Scaling: A Semisupervised Text Analysis Technique for New Domains and LanguagesCommunication Methods and Measures, 15
L. Hooghe, G. Marks (2009)
A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining DissensusBritish Journal of Political Science, 39
R. Inglehart (1977)
The Silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among western publicsForeign Affairs, 56
M. Stubbs (2010)
THREE CONCEPTS OF KEYWORDS
G. Sartori (1977)
Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis
W. Riker (1982)
Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice
P. Norris, R. Inglehart (2019)
Cultural Backlash
R. Dahl (1971)
Polyarchy; participation and opposition
M. Coppedge, J. Gerring, David Altman, M. Bernhard, Steven Fish, A. Hicken, M. Kroenig, Staffan Lindberg, Kelly McMann, Pamela Paxton, H. Semetko, Svend-Erik Skaaning, Jeffrey Staton, Jan Teorell (2011)
Conceptualizing and Measuring Democracy: A New ApproachPerspectives on Politics, 9
An alternative approach would be the use of sentiment analysis to measure positions
Justin Grimmer (2010)
A Bayesian Hierarchical Topic Model for Political Texts: Measuring Expressed Agendas in Senate Press ReleasesPolitical Analysis, 18
Giovanni Capoccia (2002)
Anti-System PartiesJournal of Theoretical Politics, 14
D. Rayside (1978)
The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles Among Western Publics Ronald Inglehart Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977, pp. xiii, 482Canadian Journal of Political Science, 11
C. Vries, S. Hobolt (2020)
Political Entrepreneurs
(2016)
Parliaments and governments database (parlgov): Information on parties, elections and cabinets in modern democracies. Development Version
Takis Pappas (2019)
Populism and Liberal Democracy
Cas Mudde, C. Kaltwasser (2017)
Populism: A Very Short Introduction
C. Vries, S. Hobolt (2020)
Political Entrepreneurs: The Rise of Challenger Parties in Europe
H. Klüver, Iñaki Sagarzazu (2016)
Setting the Agenda or Responding to Voters? Political Parties, Voters and Issue AttentionWest European Politics, 39
Eduardo Muñoz (2021)
Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit and Authoritarian PopulismBrazilian Political Science Review, 15
M. Zald, Herbert Kitschelt (1990)
The Logics of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West Germany.Administrative Science Quarterly, 35
Leon Epstein (1978)
Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis , Volume I. By Sartori Giovanni. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976. Pp. xiii + 370. $32.50, cloth; $10.95, paper.)American Political Science Review, 72
Claire Snyder-Hall (2019)
How Democracies DieNew Political Science, 41
Herbert Kitschelt (1989)
The Logics of Party Formation: Ecological Politics in Belgium and West GermanyAmerican Political Science Review, 84
Marc Bühlmann, W. Merkel, L. Müller, B. Wessels (2012)
The Democracy Barometer: A New Instrument to Measure the Quality of Democracy and its Potential for Comparative ResearchEuropean Political Science, 11
L. Diamond (2015)
Democracy in Decline
Cas Mudde, Cristóbal Kaltwasser (2018)
Studying Populism in Comparative Perspective: Reflections on the Contemporary and Future Research AgendaComparative Political Studies, 51
S. Hobolt, C. Vries (2016)
Public Support for European IntegrationAnnual Review of Political Science, 19
The varying number of entries for each principle does not imply that our measurements are more accurate for one principle than for another. Often
Herbert Kitschelt (1994)
The transformation of European social democracy
Hanspeter Kriesi, Takis Pappas (2015)
European populism in the shadow of the great recession
L. Hooghe, G. Marks (2018)
Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavageJournal of European Public Policy, 25
W. Merkel (2004)
Embedded and defective democraciesDemocratization, 11
(2022)
Party press releases – Austria, Germany, Switzerland
Catherine Vries, S. Hobolt (2012)
When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneursEuropean Union Politics, 13
Cas Mudde (2004)
The Populist ZeitgeistGovernment and Opposition, 39
Scholars have paid increasing attention to how questions of multi-level governance have become politicized in the domestic political arena. Issues surrounding democratic government itself have received surprisingly little attention in this debate. In this article, we ask how political parties politicize the principles of liberal democracy within advanced democracies. We expect that challenger parties are most likely to question existing principles. The targets of their criticism, however, should vary according to their ideological origins. Conducting automated quantitative text analysis of Swiss, German and Austrian party press releases between 2006 and 2018 using a multidimensional dictionary of liberal democracy, we confirm that left-libertarian and populist radical right parties are the main challengers of the democratic status quo. The foundation of criticism, however, differs fundamentally. While left-libertarians focus on principles that strengthen individual autonomy in politics, populist radical right parties demand more forms of participation and fewer constraints by liberal elements of democracy.
Journal of European Public Policy – Taylor & Francis
Published: Oct 3, 2023
Keywords: Liberal democracy; left-libertarian parties; politicization of democracy; populist radical right parties; automated text analysis; dictionary
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.