Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Ritu Agarwal, V. Venkatesh (2002)
Assessing a Firm's Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of UsabilityInf. Syst. Res., 13
Thompson Teo, S. Srivastava, Li Jiang (2008)
Trust and Electronic Government Success: An Empirical StudyJournal of Management Information Systems, 25
J. Roy (2007)
E-Government in Canada: Transition or Transformation?
L. Berntzen, M. Olsen (2009)
Benchmarking e-Government - A Comparative Review of Three International Benchmarking Studies2009 Third International Conference on Digital Society
G. Nasi, F. Frosini (2010)
Vision and Practice of E-Government: An Empirical StudyEconomic & Social Impacts of Innovation eJournal
K. Layne, Jungwoo Lee (2001)
Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage modelGov. Inf. Q., 18
J. Dietrich (2004)
Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Chee‐Wee Tan, I. Benbasat (2009)
IT Mediated Customer Services in E-Government: A Citizen's PerspectiveCommun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 24
(2006)
Decision Sciences Institute Southwest Region 2006 SWDSI proceedings 37th annual conference
Kelly Edmiston (2003)
State And Local E-GovernmentThe American Review of Public Administration, 33
Cora Lai, Guilherme Pires (2010)
Testing of a model evaluating e-Government portal acceptance and satisfaction
(2009)
Multi-criteria analysis: A manual. Department of Communities and Local Government
S. Drobne, A. Lisec (2009)
Multi-attribute Decision Analysis in GIS: Weighted Linear Combination and Ordered Weighted AveragingInformatica (Slovenia), 33
Sangmi Chai, Tejaswini Herath, Insu Park, H. Rao (2006)
Repeated Use of E-Gov Web Sites: A Satisfaction and Confidentiality PerspectiveInt. J. Electron. Gov. Res., 2
A Public Value Evaluation of e-Government Policies
S. Burd-Sharps, Kristen Lewis, E. Martins (2009)
Portrait of Mississippi: Mississippi Human Development Report 2009, A
Chris Anderson (2006)
The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business is Selling Less of More
Su-Houn Liu (2009)
COGNITIVE DIFFERENCES IN SERVICE QUALITY BETWEEN E-GOVERNMENT USERS AND ADMINISTRATORS
W. Proctor (2003)
Deliberative Multi-criteria Evaluation : A case study of recreation and tourism options in Victoria Australia
D. West (2005)
Digital Government
R. Watson, Bryan Mundy (2001)
A strategic perspective of electronic democracyCommun. ACM, 44
A. Macintosh (2004)
Characterizing e-participation in policy-making37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the
M. Moon (2002)
The Evolution of E-Government among Municipalities: Rhetoric or Reality?Public Administration Review, 62
Probir Banerjee, Patrick Chau (2004)
An evaluative framework for analysing e-government convergence capability in developing countriesElectron. Gov. an Int. J., 1
(2009)
Supporting innovation in small local government organizations
S. Becker (2005)
E-government usability for older adultsCommun. ACM, 48
C. Huang, Mei-Hui Chao (2001)
Managing WWW in public administration: Uses and misuses☆Gov. Inf. Q., 18
Rachel Silcock (2001)
What is E-governmentParliamentary Affairs, 54
Gerald Grant, Derek Chau (2005)
Developing a Generic Framework for E-GovernmentJ. Glob. Inf. Manag., 13
Lichun Chiang, Chao-ning Liao (2009)
The influence of digital standardization on administrative efficiency in e-government: A view of standards development organizationsSystems Research and Behavioral Science, 26
S. Colesca (2009)
Understanding Trust in e-GovernmentThe Engineering Economics, 63
Adesegun Oyedele, Kai Koong (2006)
Framework for Evaluating Global E-Government Websites
(2004)
eGovernment research in Europe
(2012)
America’s health rankings: A call to action for individuals and their communities
K. Thompson, C. McClure, P. Jaeger (2004)
Evaluating federal websites: Improving e-government for the people
Forrest Morgeson, Sunil Mithas (2009)
Does E‐Government Measure Up to E‐Business? Comparing End User Perceptions of U.S. Federal Government and E‐Business Web SitesPublic Administration Review, 69
(2003)
The e-government imperative
Å. Grönlund, T. Horan (2005)
Introducing e-Gov: History, Definitions, and IssuesCommun. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 15
(2002)
The state of federal websites: The pursuit of excellence
Sang Lee, X. Tan, S. Trimi (2005)
Current practices of leading e-government countriesCommunications of the ACM, 48
Lili Wang, S. Bretschneider, J. Gant (2005)
Evaluating Web-Based E-Government Services with a Citizen-Centric ApproachProceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
S. Alshawi, Hamid Alalwany (2009)
E-government evaluation: Citizen's perspective in developing countriesInformation Technology for Development, 15
Lynette Kvasny, M. Keil (2006)
The challenges of redressing the digital divide: a tale of two US citiesInformation Systems Journal, 16
F. Bélanger, Lemuria Carter (2009)
The impact of the digital divide on e-government useCommun. ACM, 52
Gianluca Misuraca (2009)
e-Government 2015: exploring m-government scenarios, between ICT-driven experiments and citizen-centric implicationsTechnology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21
Chee‐Wee Tan, S. Pan (2003)
Managing e-transformation in the public sector: an e-government study of the Inland Revenue Authority of Singapore (IRAS)European Journal of Information Systems, 12
(2001)
Privacy strategies for electronic government
V. Pinilla, L. Torres, S. Royo (2010)
Is E-Government Leading to More Accountable and Transparent Local Governments? An Overall ViewPublic Economics: Miscellaneous Issues eJournal
A. Chadwick, C. May (2003)
Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: “e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European UnionGovernance, 16
M. Leavitt, B. Shneiderman, R. Bailey, Carol Barnum, J. Bosley, B. Chaparro, J. Dumas, M. Ivory, Bonnie John, Hal Miller-Jacobs, S. Koyani, James Lewis, Stanley Page, J. Ramey, J. Redish, J. Scholtz, S. Wigginton, Cari Wolfson, L. Wood, Don Zimmerman (2006)
Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines [2006 edition]
C. Alexander (2007)
E-Government in Canada: Transformation for the Digital Age
T. Sullivan (2004)
EVALUATING ENVIRONMENTAL DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS.
J. Palmer (2002)
Web Site Usability, Design, and Performance MetricsInf. Syst. Res., 13
A. Ho (2002)
Reinventing Local Governments and the E‐Government InitiativePublic Administration Review, 62
(2004)
The determinants of the global digital divide: A cross-country analysis of computer and Internet penetration. Santa Cruz, CA: Department of Economics, UCSC
James Scott (2006)
“E” the People: Do U.S. Municipal Government Web Sites Support Public Involvement?Public Administration Review, 66
A. Garcia, Cristiano Maciel, F. Pinto (2005)
A Quality Inspection Method to Evaluate E-Government Sites
E. Welch, W. Wong (2001)
Global Information Technology Pressure and Government Accountability: The Mediating Effect of Domestic Context on Website OpennessJournal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11
C. Reddick (2005)
Empirical Models of E-Government Growth in Local Governmentse-Service Journal, 3
This study examines the concept of electronic government (e-government) inclusiveness and evaluates the inclusiveness of local e-government websites. Inclusiveness sets e-government apart from other types of websites (e.g. commercial or organizational sites) that only serve exclusive market segments. An evaluation for inclusiveness of 101 local government websites from Mississippi (an underdeveloped area by many health and social metrics) revealed (1) a high frequency of issues that prevent inclusive service (on average each site had 291.83 issues), (2) high variability in terms of number of issues (range = [2, 3171]), and (3) widespread absence of websites (87 of the 188 municipalities and county seats did not have discoverable websites). These results suggest there is a need for more inclusiveness, but the allocation of resources to accomplish this may not be feasible. To address this, two strategic options are presented to information technology (IT) policy-makers who seek to leverage e-government for development: an idealistic approach with traditional IT investment for future returns and a pragmatic one that resembles an entrepreneurial IT start-up venture. The study contributes in three ways: we identify the concept and criteria of e-government inclusiveness; develop an automated, software-based, and replicable evaluation method that can be used by local governments to improve a website's inclusiveness; and present strategic options for using e-government to promote social and economic development.
Information Technology for Development – Taylor & Francis
Published: Jan 2, 2016
Keywords: eGovernment; IT policy; IT infrastructures for public administration and reform
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.