Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Loading next page...
/lp/springer-journals/why-generalized-structured-component-analysis-is-not-universally-Hob4gouFm3
References (32)
-
MW Browne, R Cudeck (1993)
Testing structural equation models -
C Fornell, FL Bookstein (1982)
Two structural equation models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theoryJournal of Marketing Research, 19
-
TJ Du, JS Tanaka (1989)
Influence of sample size, estimation method, and model specification on goodness-of-fit assessments in structural equation modelsJournal of Applied Psychology, 74
-
M Tenenhaus (2008)
Component-based structural equation modellingTotal Quality Management and Business Excellence, 19
-
H Hwang, WS Desarbo, Y Takane (2007)
Fuzzy clusterwise generalized structured component analysisPsychometrika, 72
-
P Horst (1961)
Relations among m sets of measuresPsychometrika, 26
-
C Fornell, DF Larcker (1981)
Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement errorJournal of Marketing Research, 18
-
H Hwang (2009)
Regularized generalized structured component analysisPsychometrika, 74
-
WJ Reinartz, M Haenlein, J Henseler (2009)
An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEMInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 26
-
TK Dijkstra (1983)
Some comments on maximum likelihood and partial least squares methodsJournal of Econometrics, 22
-
H Hwang (2007)
VisualGSCA 1.0, a graphical user interface software program for generalized structured component analysis -
KF Widaman (1990)
Bias in pattern loadings represented by common factor analysis and component analysisMultivariate Behavioral Research, 25
-
M Croon (2002)
Latent variable and latent structure models -
A Diamantopoulos, HM Winklhofer (2001)
Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale developmentJournal of Marketing Research, 38
-
W Meredith, RE Millsap (1985)
On component analysesPsychometrika, 50
-
M Bunge (1967)
Scientific research I: The search for system -
RP McDonald (1968)
A unified treatment of the weighting problemPsychometrika, 33
-
RP Bagozzi, LW Phillips (1982)
Representing and testing organizational theories: A holistic construalAdministrative Science Quarterly, 27
-
RK Chandy (2003)
Research as innovation: Rewards, perils, and guideposts for research and reviews in marketingJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31
-
H Hwang, M-HR Ho, J Lee (2010)
Generalized structured component analysis with latent interactionsPsychometrika, 75
-
H Hwang, NK Malhotra, Y Kim, MA Tomiuk, S Hong (2010b)
A comparative study on parameter recovery of three approaches to structural equation modelingJournal of Marketing Research, 47
-
H Hwang, Y Takane (2004)
Generalized structured component analysisPsychometrika, 69
-
H Baumgartner, C Homburg (1996)
Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A reviewInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 13
-
J Leeuw, FW Young, Y Takane (1976)
Additive structure in qualitative data: An alternating least squares method with optimal scaling featuresPsychometrika, 41
-
IRR Lu, E Kwan, DR Thomas, M Cedzynski (2011)
Two new methods for estimating structural equation models: An illustration and a comparison with two established methodsInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 28
-
H Hwang, Y Takane, NK Malhotra (2007)
Multilevel generalized structured component analysisBehaviormetrika, 34
-
JJ McArdle, RP McDonald (1984)
Some algebraic properties of the reticular action model for moment structuresBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 37
-
DA Schweidel, PS Fader, ET Bradlow (2008)
Understanding service retention within and across cohorts using limited informationJournal of Marketing, 72
-
RP Bagozzi, Y Yi (1988)
On the evaluation of structural equation modelsJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16
-
CL Shook, DJ Ketchen, GTM Hult, KM Kacmar (2004)
An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management researchStrategic Management Journal, 25
-
PM Podsakoff, SB MacKenzie, J-Y Lee, NP Podsakoff (2003)
Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remediesJournal of Applied Psychology, 88
-
L Hu, PM Bentler (1998)
Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecificationPsychological Methods, 3
- Publisher
- Springer Journals
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2011 by The Author(s)
- Subject
- Business and Management; Business and Management, general; Marketing; Social Sciences, general
- ISSN
- 0092-0703
- eISSN
- 1552-7824
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11747-011-0298-6
- Publisher site
- See Article on Publisher Site
Abstract
Generalized structured component analysis has emerged in marketing and psychometric literature as an alternative to structural equation modeling. A recent simulation study recommends that, in most cases, this analysis is preferable to structural equation modeling because it outperforms the latter when the model is misspecified. This article examines the characteristics of generalized structured component analysis and reveals that the surprising previous findings are attributable to an incomplete experimental design and an error incurred during the software implementation of generalized structured component analysis. Simulated data show that generalized structured component analysis provides inconsistent estimates. In some instances, model misspecification can nearly neutralize this inconsistency, but in others it will reinforce the inconsistency. Moreover, generalized structured component analysis is hardly suitable for mediation analysis because it substantially overestimates the direct effect. Thus, generalized structured component analysis cannot be recommended universally over structural equation modeling.
Journal
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science – Springer Journals
Published: Dec 30, 2011