Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
M. Rahim, Sung Kim, Hyeongryul So, Hyung Kim, G. Cheon, Eun Lee, K. Kang, D. Lee (2014)
Recent Trends in PET Image Interpretations Using Volumetric and Texture-based Quantification Methods in Nuclear OncologyNuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 48
M. Graham, R. Wahl, J. Hoffman, J. Yap, J. Sunderland, R. Boellaard, E. Perlman, Paul Kinahan, P. Christian, O. Hoekstra, G. Dorfman (2015)
Summary of the UPICT Protocol for 18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging in Oncology Clinical TrialsThe Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 56
J. Daisne, T. Duprez, B. Weynand, M. Lonneux, M. Hamoir, H. Reychler, V. Grégoire (2004)
Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen.Radiology, 233 1
Kyoungjune Pak, G. Cheon, Hyun-Yeol Nam, Seong-Jang Kim, K. Kang, June-Key Chung, E. Kim, D. Lee (2014)
Prognostic Value of Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis in Head and Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisThe Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 55
Yeu Wang, Jonathan Moss, R. Thisted (1992)
Predictors of body surface area.Journal of clinical anesthesia, 4 1
K. Ott, U. Fink, K. Becker, A. Stahl, H. Dittler, R. Busch, H. Stein, F. Lordick, T. Link, M. Schwaiger, J. Siewert, W. Weber (2003)
Prediction of response to preoperative chemotherapy in gastric carcinoma by metabolic imaging: results of a prospective trial.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 21 24
M. Vanderhoek, S. Perlman, R. Jeraj (2012)
Impact of the Definition of Peak Standardized Uptake Value on Quantification of Treatment ResponseThe Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 53
R. Doot, E. McDonald, D. Mankoff (2014)
Role of PET quantitation in the monitoring of cancer response to treatment: review of approaches and human clinical trialsClinical and Translational Imaging, 2
R. Wahl, H. Jacene, Y. Kasamon, M. Lodge (2009)
From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET Response Criteria in Solid TumorsJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 50
H. Young, R. Baum, U. Cremerius, K. Herholz, O. Hoekstra, A. Lammertsma, J. Pruim, P. Price (1999)
Measurement of clinical and subclinical tumour response using [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose and positron emission tomography: review and 1999 EORTC recommendations. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) PET Study Group.European journal of cancer, 35 13
A. Schaefer, Yoo-Jin Kim, S. Kremp, Sebastian Mai, J. Fleckenstein, H. Bohnenberger, H. Schäfers, J. Kuhnigk, R. Bohle, C. Rübe, C. Kirsch, A. Grgic (2013)
PET-based delineation of tumour volumes in lung cancer: comparison with pathological findingsEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 40
G. Haycock, G. Schwartz, D. Wisotsky (1978)
Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults.The Journal of pediatrics, 93 1
R. Hume, In, Allen Peng, Chen, Huang, Chang (1966)
Prediction of lean body mass from height and weightJournal of Clinical Pathology, 19
G. Lucignani (2009)
SUV and segmentation: pressing challenges in tumour assessment and treatmentEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 36
Y. Sugawara, K. Zasadny, Alex Neuhoff, R. Wahl (1999)
Reevaluation of the standardized uptake value for FDG: variations with body weight and methods for correction.Radiology, 213 2
E. Frey, J. Humm, M. Ljungberg (2012)
Accuracy and precision of radioactivity quantification in nuclear medicine images.Seminars in nuclear medicine, 42 3
J. Hoff, L. Oehme, G. Schramm, J. Maus, A. Lougovski, J. Petr, B. Beuthien-Baumann, F. Hofheinz (2013)
The PET-derived tumor-to-blood standard uptake ratio (SUR) is superior to tumor SUV as a surrogate parameter of the metabolic rate of FDGEJNMMI Research, 3
R. Boellaard, R. Delgado-Bolton, W. Oyen, F. Giammarile, K. Tatsch, W. Eschner, F. Verzijlbergen, S. Barrington, L. Pike, W. Weber, S. Stroobants, D. Delbeke, K. Donohoe, Scott Holbrook, M. Graham, G. Testanera, O. Hoekstra, J. Zijlstra, Eric Visser, C. Hoekstra, J. Pruim, A. Willemsen, B. Arends, J. Kotzerke, A. Bockisch, T. Beyer, A. Chiti, B. Krause (2014)
FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 42
P. Jong, H. Ufford, H. Baarslag, M. Haas, S. Wittebol, L. Quekel, J. Klerk (2009)
CT and 18F-FDG PET for noninvasive detection of splenic involvement in patients with malignant lymphoma.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 192 3
Yiran Zheng, J. Syh, M. Yao, B. Wessels (2010)
An Automatic Method for PET Target Segmentation Using a Lookup Table Based on Volume and Concentration RatioTechnology in Cancer Research & Treatment, 9
M. Lodge, M. Chaudhry, R. Wahl (2012)
Noise Considerations for PET Quantification Using Maximum and Peak Standardized Uptake ValueThe Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 53
N. Paquet, A. Albert, J. Foidart, R. Hustinx (2004)
Within-patient variability of (18)F-FDG: standardized uptake values in normal tissues.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 45 5
H. Jacene, S. Leboulleux, S. Baba, D. Chatzifotiadis, B. Goudarzi, Oleg Teytelbaum, K. Horton, I. Kamel, K. Macura, H. Tsai, J. Kowalski, R. Wahl (2009)
Assessment of Interobserver Reproducibility in Quantitative 18F-FDG PET and CT Measurements of Tumor Response to TherapyJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 50
A. Kirov, L. Fanchon (2014)
Pathology-validated PET image data sets and their role in PET segmentationClinical and Translational Imaging, 2
Michael Adams, T. Turkington, Joshua Wilson, T. Wong (2010)
A systematic review of the factors affecting accuracy of SUV measurements.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 195 2
Jinming Yu, Xinke Li, L. Xing, D. Mu, Z. Fu, Xiaorong Sun, Xiangyu Sun, Guoren Yang, Bai-jiang Zhang, Xindong Sun, C. Ling (2009)
Comparison of tumor volumes as determined by pathologic examination and FDG-PET/CT images of non-small-cell lung cancer: a pilot study.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 75 5
M. Benz, V. Evilevitch, M. Allen-Auerbach, F. Eilber, M. Phelps, J. Czernin, W. Weber (2008)
Treatment Monitoring by 18F-FDG PET/CT in Patients with Sarcomas: Interobserver Variability of Quantitative Parameters in Treatment-Induced Changes in Histopathologically Responding and Nonresponding TumorsJournal of Nuclear Medicine, 49
A. Arens, E. Troost, B. Hoeben, W. Grootjans, J. Lee, V. Grégoire, M. Hatt, D. Visvikis, J. Bussink, W. Oyen, J. Kaanders, E. Visser (2014)
Semiautomatic methods for segmentation of the proliferative tumour volume on sequential FLT PET/CT images in head and neck carcinomas and their relation to clinical outcomeEuropean Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 41
Mosteller Rd (1987)
Simplified Calculation of Body-Surface AreaThe New England Journal of Medicine, 317
P. Boer (1984)
Estimated lean body mass as an index for normalization of body fluid volumes in humans.The American journal of physiology, 247 4 Pt 2
O. Mawlawi, J. Erasmus, R. Munden, T. Pan, Amy Knight, H. Macapinlac, D. Podoloff, M. Chasen (2006)
Quantifying the effect of IV contrast media on integrated PET/CT: clinical evaluation.AJR. American journal of roentgenology, 186 2
M. Hatt, C. Rest, A. Baardwijk, P. Lambin, O. Pradier, D. Visvikis (2011)
Impact of Tumor Size and Tracer Uptake Heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET and CT Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Tumor DelineationThe Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 52
Positron emission tomography (PET) has come to the practice of oncology. It is known that 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET is more sensitive for the assessment of treatment response than conventional imaging. In addition, PET has an advantage in the use of quantitative analysis of the study. Nowadays, various PET parameters are adopted in clinical settings. In addition, a wide range of factors has been known to be associated with FDG uptake. Therefore, there has been a need for standardization and harmonization of protocols and PET parameters. We will introduce PET parameters and discuss major issues in this review.
Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging – Springer Journals
Published: Apr 18, 2016
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.