Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
Griet Herder, G. Isterdael, T. Beeckman, Ive Smet (2010)
The roots of a new green revolution.Trends in plant science, 15 11
D. Warner, G. Edwards (1988)
C4 photosynthesis and leaf anatomy in diploid and autotetraploid Pennisetum americanum (pearl millet)Plant Science, 56
Deepesh Bhatt, Manisha Negi, Priyadarshini Sharma, S. Saxena, A. Dobriyal, S. Arora (2011)
Responses to drought induced oxidative stress in five finger millet varieties differing in their geographical distributionPhysiology and Molecular Biology of Plants, 17
T. Sharkey, C. Bernacchi, G. Farquhar, E. Singsaas (2007)
Fitting photosynthetic carbon dioxide response curves for C(3) leaves.Plant, cell & environment, 30 9
B. Ma, M. Morrison, H. Voldeng (1995)
Leaf Greenness and Photosynthetic Rates in SoybeanCrop Science, 35
Xinguang Zhu, S. Long, D. Ort (2010)
Improving photosynthetic efficiency for greater yield.Annual review of plant biology, 61
Thomas Sharkey, Klaus Raschke (1981)
Separation and measurement of direct and indirect effects of light on stomata.Plant physiology, 68 1
(1996)
Millet production, (pp 1–8)
L. Evans, R. Dunstone (1970)
Some physiological aspects of evolution in wheat.Australian Journal of Biological Sciences, 23
A. Ciha, W. Brun (1975)
Stomatal Size and Frequency in Soybeans 1Crop Science, 15
S. Padulosi, B. Mal, O. King, E. Gotor (2015)
Minor Millets as a Central Element for Sustainably Enhanced Incomes, Empowerment, and Nutrition in Rural IndiaSustainability, 7
P. Flood, J. Harbinson, M. Aarts (2011)
Natural genetic variation in plant photosynthesis.Trends in plant science, 16 6
J. Evans (2013)
Improving PhotosynthesisPlant Physiology, 162
L. Sack, C. Scoffoni, Grace John, Hendrik Poorter, Chase Mason, R. Méndez-Alonzo, L. Donovan (2013)
How do leaf veins influence the worldwide leaf economic spectrum? Review and synthesis.Journal of experimental botany, 64 13
高野 義大, 角田 重三郎 (1971)
Curvilinear Regression of the Leaf Photosynthetic Rate on Leaf Nitrogen Content among Strains of Oryza Species, 21
Xiao-xia Wen, Dewei Zhang, Yun-cheng Liao, Z. Jia, Shuren Ji (2012)
Effects of Water-Collecting and -Retaining Techniques on Photosynthetic Rates, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency of Millet Grown in a Semiarid RegionJournal of Integrative Agriculture, 11
S. McCouch, Leonid Teytelman, Yunbi Xu, K. Lobos, K. Clare, M. Walton, B. Fu, R. Maghirang, Zhikang Li, Y. Xing, Qifa Zhang, I. Kono, M. Yano, R. Fjellstrom, G. DeClerck, David Schneider, S. Cartinhour, D. Ware, L. Stein (2002)
Development and mapping of 2240 new SSR markers for rice (Oryza sativa L.).DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes, 9 6
(2005)
Analysis of genetic variability in yield - related traits of rice using global core collection . II . Leaf photosynthetic rate and associated factors
L. Sack, C. Scoffoni (2013)
Leaf venation: structure, function, development, evolution, ecology and applications in the past, present and future.The New phytologist, 198 4
Photosynthesis is one of the important processes, and understanding its variability can be one of the approaches to improve crop productivity. It is presumed that most of the minor millets have C4 type of photosynthetic carbon fixation. However, research on quantifying the variability in photosynthesis associated traits in minor millets is limited. Objectives of this study were to (1) quantify the variation in leaf anatomical, physiological and yield traits among the minor millets and (2) to assess whether photosynthesis associated traits had a relationship with grain yield in minor millet. The result indicated that finger millet, little millet, barnyard millet, proso millet, foxtail millet and kodo millet had C4 leaf anatomy, and among them, finger millet had an increased vascular bundle and bundle sheath cell size. Among the minor millets, at ambient light, temperature and CO2 levels, the photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, intrinsic water use efficiency, number of major and minor veins, and grain yield were higher in foxtail millet. The CO2 response curve indicates that proso millet had a higher photosynthetic rate at higher concentrations of CO2 than other minor millets. However, the light response curve suggests that foxtail millet had a higher photosynthetic rate at higher light intensity levels. Among the minor millets studied, there was no relationship between mean photosynthesis associated traits over different growth stages with grain yield.
Plant Physiology Reports – Springer Journals
Published: Sep 18, 2020
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.