Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
P.A. Saccardo (1915)
Notae mycologicaeAnnales Mycologici, 13
E. Wechtl (1990)
Phomopsis Coelomycetes species on Compositae and Umbelliferae: a critical evaluation of characters with keys., 22
R.G. Shivas, J.G. Allen, P.M. Williamson (1991)
Infraspecific variation demostrated in Phomopsis leptostromformis using cultural and biochemical techniquesMycological Research, 95
C.C. Brittlebank (1911)
Records of the Science Branch
P.A. Saccardo (1880)
Michelia
J. Pscheidt, R. Pearson (1989)
Time of infection and control of. Phomopsis fruit rot of grapePlant Disease, 73
R. Cerkauskas, J. Sinclair (1980)
Use of paraquat to aid detection of fungi in soybean tissues.Phytopathology, 70
(1924)
On the dead-arm disease of grape vine in the vicinity of Sapporo
C. Shear
The ascogenous form of the fungus causing dead-arm of the grape.Phytopathology, 1
J. Cucuzza, M. Sall (1982)
Phomopsis cane and leaf spot disease of grapevine: effects of chemical treatments on inoculum level, disease severity, and yield.Plant Disease, 66
C. Brittlebank
Records of the Science Branch, Department of Agriculture, Victoria, 799/11.
M. Sweetingham, R. Cruickshank, D. Wong (1986)
Pectic zymograms and taxonomy and pathogenicity of the CeratobasidiaceaeTransactions of The British Mycological Society, 86
T. Pine (1959)
Development of the Grape dead-arm disease.Phytopathology, 49
(1974)
Methode favorisant la production de spores de type beta chez Phomopsis viti cola
S. Plessis (1938)
The dead-arm disease of the vineFarming in South Africa, 13
R. Cruickshank (1983)
Distinction between Sclerotinia species by their pectic zymogramsTransactions of The British Mycological Society, 80
(1969)
Influences de l'Excoriose sur Ie debourrement et l'evolution de grefTes
R. J. Noble, H. J. Hynes, F.C. McCleery, W.A. Birmingham (1935)
Plant diseases recorded in New Pezet, R. (1974) — Methode favorisant la production de spores de type beta chez Phomopsis viticola SaccPhytopathologische Zeitschrijl, 79
R.H. Taylor, J.M. Mabbitt (1961)
Dead-arm disease of grapevinesThe Journal of Agriculture, Victoria, 59
D. Reddick (1909)
Necrosis of the vineNew York State Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin, 263
(1923)
Influence of soil temperature and moisture on infection of wheat seedlings by Helminthosporium
(1937)
Notizie su una malattia della vite poco conosciuta
(1984)
L,Excoriose de la vigne: recherches sur Ie Phomopsis viticola Sacc., nouvelles possibilities de lutte
W. Moller, A. Kasimatis (1978)
Dieback of grapevines caused by Eutypa armeniacae.Plant disease reporter, 62
(1991)
- Fungi dangerous for the grapevine grown under cover
R. Cruickshank, G. Wade (1980)
Detection of pectic enzymes in pectin-acrylamide gels.Analytical biochemistry, 107 1
T. Pine (1958)
Etiology of the dead-arm disease of Grapevines.Phytopathology, 48
R. Shivas, J. Allen, P. Williamson (1991)
Infraspecific variation demonstrated in Phomopsis leptostromiformis using cultural and biochemical techniquesFungal Biology, 95
B. Lal, A. Arya (1982)
A soft rot of grapes caused by Phomopsis viticola.Indian phytopathology, 35
Phomopsis viticola is the cause of cane and leaf blight of grapevines. We examined 63 isolates obtained from a survey of 50 vineyards in New South Wales, Victoria, South Australia, Western Australia and Tasmania, from collections in the New South Wales Agriculture Plant Pathology Herbarium, and from vine specimens from a further 36 vineyards. Two distinct taxa (Taxa 1 and 2) of Phomopsis were found, based on alpha spore morphology, appearance of the pycnidium, cirrhus colour, rate of mycelial growth and sporulation in vitro. Minor taxa (Taxa 3 and 4) were found also. Of the isolates studied, 26 were of Taxon 1 and 33 of Taxon 2. Taxon 1 occurred predominantly in coastal vineyards and Taxon 2 in inland vineyards. Studies of isolates representing the different taxa indicated variability in host response, pectic enzyme profile and temperature for optimum spore germination. These criteria confirmed the morphological grouping of the isolates. Isolates DAR 69489, DAR 69457, DAR 69458 and DAR 69484 were designated as representative isolates of Taxa 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively. Taxon 1 fits the current taxonomic description of Phomopsis viticola (Sacc.) Sacc. Taxon 2 may resemble the species named Fusicoccum viticolum Reddick, or be a variety of P. viticola (Sacc.) Sacc. or a distinct species of Phomopsis. The widespread occurrence of Phomopsis in Australia and the presence of different taxa in the different viticultural regions are demonstrated.
Australasian Plant Pathology – Springer Journals
Published: Jan 27, 2011
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.