Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
A. Giannousakis, Jérôme Hilaire, G. Nemet, Gunnar Luderer, R. Pietzcker, Renato Rodrigues, Lavinia Baumstark, E. Kriegler (2020)
How uncertainty in technology costs and carbon dioxide removal availability affect climate mitigation pathwaysEnergy
O. Krabbe, Giel Linthorst, K. Blok, Wina Crijns-Graus, D. Vuuren, N. Höhne, P. Faria, Nathaniel Aden, A. Pineda (2015)
Aligning corporate greenhouse-gas emissions targets with climate goalsNature Climate Change, 5
H. Carlsen, E. Eriksson, K. Dreborg, B. Johansson, Ö. Bodin (2016)
Systematic exploration of scenario spacesForesight, 18
M. Tavoni, R. Tol (2010)
Counting only the hits? The risk of underestimating the costs of stringent climate policyClimatic Change, 100
E. Kriegler, I. Mouratiadou, Gunnar Luderer, N. Bauer, R. Brecha, K. Calvin, E. Cian, J. Edmonds, K. Jiang, M. Tavoni, O. Edenhofer (2016)
Will economic growth and fossil fuel scarcity help or hinder climate stabilization?Climatic Change, 136
Andrew Parker, S. Srinivasan, R. Lempert, S. Berry (2015)
Evaluating Simulation-Derived Scenarios for Effective Decision SupportTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 91
Kaj-Ivar Wijst, A. Hof, D. Vuuren (2021)
On the optimality of 2°C targets and a decomposition of uncertaintyNature Communications, 12
J. Rogelj, D. Huppmann, V. Krey, K. Riahi, L. Clarke, M. Gidden, Zebedee Nicholls, M. Meinshausen (2019)
A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goalNature, 573
S. Pye, F. Li, A. Petersen, O. Broad, W. McDowall, J. Price, W. Usher (2018)
Assessing qualitative and quantitative dimensions of uncertainty in energy modelling for policy support in the United KingdomEnergy Research & Social Science
R. McMahon, M. Stauffacher, R. Knutti (2015)
The unseen uncertainties in climate change: reviewing comprehension of an IPCC scenario graphClimatic Change, 133
G. Xexakis, E. Trutnevyte (2021)
Empirical testing of the visualizations of climate change mitigation scenarios with citizens: A comparison among Germany, Poland, and FranceGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 70
Z. Hausfather, Glen Peters (2020)
Emissions – the ‘business as usual’ story is misleadingNature, 577
C. Guivarch, J. Rozenberg, V. Schweizer (2016)
The diversity of socio-economic pathways and CO2 emissions scenarios: Insights from the investigation of a scenarios databaseEnviron. Model. Softw., 80
Patrick Steinmann, W. Auping, J. Kwakkel (2020)
Behavior-based scenario discovery using time series clusteringTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 156
V. Marchau, W. Walker, P. Bloemen, S. Popper (2019)
Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty
Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle (2006)
Cross-impact balances: A system-theoretical approach to cross-impact analysisTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 73
B. Sanderson, R. Knutti, P. Caldwell (2015)
A Representative Democracy to Reduce Interdependency in a Multimodel EnsembleJournal of Climate, 28
D. Hadka, J. Herman, P. Reed, K. Keller (2015)
An open source framework for many-objective robust decision makingEnviron. Model. Softw., 74
Victor Strecher, Todd Greenwood, Catharine Wang, Dana Dumont (1999)
Interactive multimedia and risk communication.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs, 25
V. Schweizer (2020)
Reflections on cross-impact balances, a systematic method constructing global socio-technical scenarios for climate change researchClimatic Change, 162
L. Kaack, J. Apt, M. Morgan, P. McSharry, P. McSharry (2017)
Empirical prediction intervals improve energy forecastingProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114
C. Auer, E. Kriegler, H. Carlsen, K. Kok, Simona Pedde, V. Krey, Boris Müller (2021)
Climate change scenario services: From science to facilitating actionOne Earth
J. Friedman, N. Fisher (1999)
Bump hunting in high-dimensional dataStatistics and Computing, 9
I. Castles, David Henderson (2003)
The IPCC Emission Scenarios: An Economic-Statistical CritiqueEnergy & Environment, 14
D. Huppmann, J. Rogelj, E. Kriegler, V. Krey, K. Riahi (2018)
A new scenario resource for integrated 1.5 °C researchNature Climate Change, 8
M. Sluisveld, M. Harmsen, D. Vuuren, V. Bosetti, C. Wilson, B. Zwaan (2018)
Comparing future patterns of energy system change in 2 °C scenarios to expert projectionsGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 50
R. Schaeffer, A. Köberle, H. Soest, C. Bertram, Gunnar Luderer, K. Riahi, V. Krey, D. Vuuren, E. Kriegler, S. Fujimori, W. Chen, C. He, Z. Vrontisi, S. Vishwanathan, A. Garg, R. Mathur, S. Shekhar, K. Oshiro, F. Ueckerdt, G. Safonov, G. Iyer, K. Gi, V. Potashnikov (2020)
Comparing transformation pathways across major economiesClimatic Change, 162
C. Weber, D. McCollum, J. Edmonds, P. Faria, Alban Pyanet, J. Rogelj, M. Tavoni, Jakob Thoma, E. Kriegler (2018)
Mitigation scenarios must cater to new usersNature Climate Change, 8
(2019)
Guidelines for Co-Production Workshops with Stakeholders from Policy, Business, and Finance with a Global Perspective (SENSES
B. O’Neill, C. Tebaldi, D. Vuuren, V. Eyring, P. Friedlingstein, G. Hurtt, R. Knutti, E. Kriegler, J. Lamarque, J. Lowe, G. Meehl, R. Moss, K. Riahi, B. Sanderson (2016)
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6Geoscientific Model Development, 9
N. Bauer, S. Rose, S. Fujimori, D. Vuuren, J. Weyant, M. Wise, Yiyun Cui, V. Daioglou, M. Gidden, Etsushi Kato, A. Kitous, Florian Leblanc, R. Sands, F. Sano, J. Strefler, J. Tsutsui, Ruben Bibas, Oliver Fricko, T. Hasegawa, David Klein, A. Kurosawa, S. Mima, M. Muratori (2018)
Global energy sector emission reductions and bioenergy use: overview of the bioenergy demand phase of the EMF-33 model comparisonClimatic Change
J. Alcamo, Teresa Ribeiro (2002)
Scenarios as Tools for International Environmental Assessments
S. Guillemant, J. Guillemant, P. Duntze (2005)
LetterOsteoporosis International, 5
Vivien Fisch-Romito, C. Guivarch (2019)
Transportation infrastructures in a low carbon world: An evaluation of investment needs and their determinantsTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Ming-li Gong, R. Lempert, Andrew Parker, Lauren Mayer, J. Fischbach, Matthew Sisco, Zhimin Mao, D. Krantz, H. Kunreuther (2017)
Testing the scenario hypothesis: An experimental comparison of scenarios and forecasts for decision support in a complex decision environmentEnviron. Model. Softw., 91
(2000)
A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Nakićenović, N
J. Lamontagne, P. Reed, R. Link, K. Calvin, L. Clarke, J. Edmonds (2018)
Large Ensemble Analytic Framework for Consequence‐Driven Discovery of Climate Change ScenariosEarth's Future, 6
(2019)
IAMC 1.5°C scenario explorer and data hosted by IIASA
D. Spiegelhalter, Mike Pearson, I. Short (2011)
Visualizing Uncertainty About the FutureScience, 333
C. Manski, A. Sanstad, S. DeCanio (2021)
Addressing partial identification in climate modeling and policy analysisProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118
G. Marangoni, M. Tavoni, V. Bosetti, E. Borgonovo, P. Capros, Oliver Fricko, D. Gernaat, C. Guivarch, P. Havlík, D. Huppmann, N. Johnson, Panagiotis Karkatsoulis, I. Keppo, V. Krey, E. Broin, J. Price, D. Vuuren (2017)
Sensitivity of projected long-term CO2 emissions across the Shared Socioeconomic PathwaysNature Climate Change, 7
V. Marchau, W. Walker, P. Bloemen, S. Popper (2019)
Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty: From Theory to Practice
D. McCollum, Wenji Zhou, C. Bertram, Harmen-Sytze Boer, V. Bosetti, S. Busch, J. Després, L. Drouet, J. Emmerling, M. Fay, Oliver Fricko, S. Fujimori, M. Gidden, M. Harmsen, D. Huppmann, G. Iyer, V. Krey, E. Kriegler, C. Nicolas, S. Pachauri, S. Parkinson, Miguel Poblete-Cazenave, P. Rafaj, Narasimha Rao, J. Rozenberg, A. Schmitz, W. Schoepp, D. Vuuren, K. Riahi (2018)
Energy investment needs for fulfilling the Paris Agreement and achieving the Sustainable Development GoalsNature Energy, 3
Elina Brutschin, S. Pianta, M. Tavoni, K. Riahi, V. Bosetti, G. Marangoni, Bas Ruijven (2021)
A multidimensional feasibility evaluation of low-carbon scenariosEnvironmental Research Letters, 16
Xiaobo Zhou, Henry Lin (2017)
Global Sensitivity Analysis
D. Groves, R. Lempert (2007)
A New Analytic Method for Finding Policy-Relevant Scenarios:Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 17
Philippe Schoutheete (2000)
The Case for Europe
O. Tietje (2005)
Identification of a small reliable and efficient set of consistent scenariosEur. J. Oper. Res., 162
M Ombadi, P Nguyen, S Sorooshian, K Hsu (2021)
Retrospective analysis and Bayesian model averaging of CMIP6 precipitation in the Nile River BasinJ. Hydrometeorol., 22
D. Huppmann, M. Gidden, Zebedee Nicholls, J. Hörsch, Robin Lamboll, P. Kishimoto, Thorsten Burandt, Oliver Fricko, E. Byers, J. Kikstra, Maarten Brinkerink, M. Budzinski, F. Maczek, Sebastian Zwickl-Bernhard, L. Welder, Erik Quispe, Christopher Smith (2021)
pyam: Analysis and visualisation of integrated assessment and macro-energy scenariosOpen Research Europe, 1
Andres Kasekamp (2000)
A Regional Perspective
Mark Wilkinson, M. Dumontier, I. Aalbersberg, Gabrielle Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg, J. Boiten, Luiz Santos, P. Bourne, J. Bouwman, A. Brookes, Tim Clark, M. Crosas, I. Dillo, Olivier Dumon, S. Edmunds, C. Evelo, R. Finkers, Alejandra González-Beltrán, A. Gray, Paul Groth, C. Goble, J. Grethe, J. Heringa, P. Hoen, R. Hooft, Tobias Kuhn, Ruben Kok, J. Kok, S. Lusher, M. Martone, Albert Mons, A. Packer, Bengt Persson, P. Rocca-Serra, M. Roos, Rene Schaik, Susanna-Assunta Sansone, E. Schultes, T. Sengstag, Ted Slater, George Strawn, M. Swertz, Mark Thompson, J. Lei, E. Mulligen, Jan Velterop, A. Waagmeester, P. Wittenburg, K. Wolstencroft, Jun Zhao, B. Mons (2016)
The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardshipScientific Data, 3
E. Trutnevyte, L. Hirt, N. Bauer, A. Cherp, A. Cherp, A. Hawkes, O. Edelenbosch, O. Edelenbosch, Simona Pedde, D. Vuuren, D. Vuuren (2019)
Societal Transformations in Models for Energy and Climate Policy: The Ambitious Next Step, 1
Philip Berntsen, E. Trutnevyte (2017)
Ensuring diversity of national energy scenarios: Bottom-up energy system model with Modeling to Generate AlternativesEnergy, 126
David Cash, W. Clark, F. Alcock, N. Dickson, Noelle Eckley, D. Guston, J. Jäger, R. Mitchell (2003)
Knowledge systems for sustainable developmentProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100
L. Clarke, J. Weyant (2009)
Introduction to the EMF 22 special issue on climate change control scenariosEnergy Economics, 31
E. Trutnevyte, C. Guivarch, R. Lempert, N. Strachan (2016)
Reinvigorating the scenario technique to expand uncertainty considerationClimatic Change, 135
C. Tebaldi, R. Knutti (2007)
The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projectionsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 365
Thais Oliveira, T. Brunelle, B. Guenet, P. Ciais, Florian Leblanc, C. Guivarch (2021)
A mixed‐effect model approach for assessing land‐based mitigation in integrated assessment models: A regional perspectiveGlobal Change Biology, 27
(2021)
NGFS Climate Scenarios for Central Banks and Supervisors (Network for Greening the Financial System
A. Grübler, N. Nakicenovic (2001)
Identifying dangers in an uncertain climateNature, 412
L. Warszawski, E. Kriegler, T. Lenton, O. Gaffney, D. Jacob, Daniel Klingenfeld, R. Koide, M. Costa, Dirk Messner, N. Nakicenovic, H. Schellnhuber, P. Schlosser, K. Takeuchi, S. Leeuw, G. Whiteman, J. Rockström (2021)
All options, not silver bullets, needed to limit global warming to 1.5 °C: a scenario appraisalEnvironmental Research Letters, 16
J. Alcamo (2008)
Environmental futures : the practice of environmental scenario analysis
Nandi Moksnes, J. Rozenberg, O. Broad, Constantinos Taliotis, M. Howells, H. Rogner (2019)
Determinants of energy futures—a scenario discovery method applied to cost and carbon emission futures for South American electricity infrastructureEnvironmental Research Communications, 1
P. Christensen, K. Gillingham, W. Nordhaus (2018)
Uncertainty in forecasts of long-run economic growthProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115
H. Mcjeon, L. Clarke, P. Kyle, M. Wise, Andrew Hackbarth, B. Bryant, R. Lempert (2011)
Technology interactions among low-carbon energy technologies: What can we learn from a large number of scenarios?Energy Economics, 33
G. Xexakis, E. Trutnevyte (2019)
Are interactive web-tools for environmental scenario visualization worth the effort? An experimental study on the Swiss electricity supply scenarios 2035Environ. Model. Softw., 119
J. Skea, R. Diemen, J. Portugal-Pereira, Alaa Khourdajie (2021)
Outlooks, explorations and normative scenarios: Approaches to global energy futures comparedTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
JP Weyant (1999)
The cost of the Kyoto Protocol: a multi-model evaluationEnergy J. Special Issue, 20
Mohammed Ombadi, P. Nguyen, S. Sorooshian, K. Hsu (2020)
Retrospective Analysis and Bayesian Model Averaging of CMIP6 Precipitation in the Nile River BasinJournal of Hydrometeorology
A. Millner, T. McDermott (2016)
Model confirmation in climate economicsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113
M. Harmsen, E. Kriegler, D. Vuuren, Kaj-Ivar Wijst, Gunnar Luderer, R. Cui, O. Dessens, L. Drouet, J. Emmerling, Jennifer Morris, Florian Fosse, Dimitris Fragkiadakis, K. Fragkiadakis, Panagiotis Fragkos, Oliver Fricko, S. Fujimori, D. Gernaat, C. Guivarch, G. Iyer, Panagiotis Karkatsoulis, I. Keppo, K. Keramidas, A. Köberle, P. Kolp, V. Krey, Christoph Krüger, Florian Leblanc, S. Mittal, S. Paltsev, P. Rochedo, Bas Ruijven, R. Sands, F. Sano, J. Strefler, Eveline Arroyo, K. Wada, Behnam Zakeri (2021)
Integrated assessment model diagnostics: key indicators and model evolutionEnvironmental Research Letters, 16
Emily Ho, D. Budescu, V. Bosetti, D. Vuuren, K. Keller (2019)
Not all carbon dioxide emission scenarios are equally likely: a subjective expert assessmentClimatic Change, 155
(1999)
a multi-model evaluation
D. Vuuren, Kaj-Ivar Wijst, S. Marsman, Maarten Berg, A. Hof, C. Jones (2020)
The costs of achieving climate targets and the sources of uncertaintyNature Climate Change, 10
W. Auping, E. Pruyt, S. Jong, J. Kwakkel (2016)
The geopolitical impact of the shale revolution: Exploring consequences on energy prices and rentier statesEnergy Policy, 98
M. Gerst, Peng Wang, M. Borsuk (2013)
Discovering plausible energy and economic futures under global change using multidimensional scenario discoveryEnviron. Model. Softw., 44
L. Beek, M. Hajer, P. Pelzer, D. Vuuren, C. Cassen (2020)
Anticipating futures through models: the rise of Integrated Assessment Modelling in the climate science-policy interface since 1970Global Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 65
(2014)
Mitigation of Climate Change (eds Edenhofer, O
R. Moss (2016)
Assessing decision support systems and levels of confidence to narrow the climate information “usability gap”Climatic Change, 135
M. Morgan, David Keith (2008)
Improving the way we think about projecting future energy use and emissions of carbon dioxideClimatic Change, 90
Tianjun Zhou, Jingwen Lu, Wenxia Zhang, Ziming Chen (2020)
The Sources of Uncertainty in the Projection of Global Land Monsoon PrecipitationGeophysical Research Letters, 47
K. Riahi, D. Vuuren, E. Kriegler, J. Edmonds, B. O’Neill, S. Fujimori, N. Bauer, K. Calvin, R. Dellink, Oliver Fricko, W. Lutz, A. Popp, J. Cuaresma, S. Kc, Marian Leimbach, Leiwen Jiang, T. Kram, Shilpa Rao, J. Emmerling, K. Ebi, T. Hasegawa, P. Havlík, Florian Humpenöder, L. Silva, Steven Smith, E. Stehfest, V. Bosetti, J. Eom, D. Gernaat, T. Masui, J. Rogelj, J. Strefler, L. Drouet, V. Krey, Gunnar Luderer, M. Harmsen, Kiyoshi Takahashi, Lavinia Baumstark, J. Doelman, M. Kainuma, Z. Klimont, G. Marangoni, H. Lotze-Campen, M. Obersteiner, A. Tabeau, M. Tavoni (2017)
The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: An overviewGlobal Environmental Change-human and Policy Dimensions, 42
RD Lamboll, ZRJ Nicholls, JS Kikstra, M Meinshausen, J Rogelj (2020)
Silicone v1.0.0: an open-source Python package for inferring missing emissions data for climate change researchGeosci. Model Dev., 13
Pei-Hao Li, S. Pye, I. Keppo (2020)
Using clustering algorithms to characterise uncertain long-term decarbonisation pathwaysApplied Energy
C. Guivarch, S. Monjon (2017)
Identifying the main uncertainty drivers of energy security in a low- carbon world: The case of Europe
M. Jaxa-Rozen, E. Trutnevyte (2021)
Sources of uncertainty in long-term global scenarios of solar photovoltaic technologyNature Climate Change, 11
Robin Lamboll, Zebedee Nicholls, J. Kikstra, M. Meinshausen, J. Rogelj (2020)
Silicone v1.0.0: an open-source Python package for inferring missing emissions data for climate change researchGeoscientific Model Development
F. Branger, L. Giraudet, C. Guivarch, P. Quirion (2015)
Global sensitivity analysis of an energy-economy model of the residential building sectorEnviron. Model. Softw., 70
M. Meyer, A. Loeschel, C. Lutz (2021)
Carbon price dynamics in ambitious climate mitigation scenarios: an analysis based on the IAMC 1.5 °C scenario explorerEnvironmental Research Communications, 3
M. New, M. Hulme (2000)
Representing uncertainty in climate change scenarios: a Monte-Carlo approachIntegrated Assessment, 1
Béatrice Cointe, C. Cassen, Alain Nadaï (2019)
Organising Policy-Relevant Knowledge for Climate ActionScience and technology studies, 32
B. Ruijven (2016)
Mind the gap – the case for medium level emission scenariosClimatic Change, 138
L. Brunner, A. Pendergrass, F. Lehner, A. Merrifield, R. Lorenz, R. Knutti (2020)
Reduced global warming from CMIP6 projections when weighting models by performance and independenceEarth System Dynamics
Andrea Saltelli, Ratto Marco, A. Terry, Campolongo Francesca, Cariboni Jessica, G. Debora, Saisana Michaela, Tarantola Stefano (2008)
Global Sensitivity Analysis: The Primer
L. Breiman, R. Olshen (2017)
Points of Significance: Classification and regression treesNature Methods, 14
L Brunner (2020)
Reduced global warming from CMIP6 projections when weighting models by performance and independenceEarth Syst. Dyn., 11
S. Elsawah, S. Hamilton, A. Jakeman, D. Rothman, V. Schweizer, E. Trutnevyte, H. Carlsen, Crystal Drakes, Bob Frame, B. Fu, C. Guivarch, M. Haasnoot, E. Kemp-Benedict, K. Kok, H. Kosow, Mike Ryan, H. Delden (2020)
Scenario processes for socio-environmental systems analysis of futures: A review of recent efforts and a salient research agenda for supporting decision making.The Science of the total environment, 729
E. Kriegler, J. Weyant, G. Blanford, V. Krey, L. Clarke, J. Edmonds, A. Fawcett, Gunnar Luderer, K. Riahi, R. Richels, S. Rose, M. Tavoni, D. Vuuren (2014)
The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategiesClimatic Change, 123
(2015)
Scenario Discovery Tools to Support Robust Decision Making, Documentation of the 'sdtoolkit' Package for R (RAND Corporation
D. Finegold (2005)
Book and Resource ReviewsAcademy of Management Learning and Education, 4
E. Kemp-Benedict (2012)
Telling better stories: strengthening the story in story and simulationEnvironmental Research Letters, 7
Mark Roelfsema, H. Soest, M. Harmsen, D. Vuuren, C. Bertram, M. Elzen, N. Höhne, G. Iacobuţă, V. Krey, E. Kriegler, Gunnar Luderer, K. Riahi, F. Ueckerdt, J. Després, L. Drouet, J. Emmerling, S. Frank, Oliver Fricko, M. Gidden, Florian Humpenöder, D. Huppmann, S. Fujimori, K. Fragkiadakis, K. Gi, K. Keramidas, A. Köberle, L. Reis, P. Rochedo, R. Schaeffer, K. Oshiro, Z. Vrontisi, Wenying Chen, G. Iyer, J. Edmonds, M. Kannavou, K. Jiang, R. Mathur, G. Safonov, S. Vishwanathan (2020)
Taking stock of national climate policies to evaluate implementation of the Paris AgreementNature Communications, 11
C. Lim, Xueru Ding, Joseph Nebus (2007)
The Monte Carlo Approach
V. Schweizer, E. Kriegler (2012)
Improving environmental change research with systematic techniques for qualitative scenariosEnvironmental Research Letters, 7
P. Alexander, R. Prestele, P. Verburg, A. Arneth, C. Baranzelli, F. Silva, Calum Brown, A. Butler, K. Calvin, N. Dendoncker, J. Doelman, R. Dunford, K. Engström, David Eitelberg, S. Fujimori, P. Harrison, T. Hasegawa, P. Havlík, S. Holzhauer, Florian Humpenöder, C. Jacobs-Crisioni, Atul Jain, Tamás Krisztin, P. Kyle, C. Lavalle, T. Lenton, Jiayi Liu, Prasanth Meiyappan, A. Popp, Tom Powell, R. Sands, R. Schaldach, E. Stehfest, J. Steinbuks, A. Tabeau, H. Meijl, M. Wise, M. Rounsevell (2017)
Assessing uncertainties in land cover projectionsGlobal Change Biology, 23
M. Lemos, C. Kirchhoff, V. Ramprasad (2012)
Narrowing the climate information usability gapNature Climate Change, 2
J. Kwakkel (2017)
The Exploratory Modeling Workbench: An open source toolkit for exploratory modeling, scenario discovery, and (multi-objective) robust decision makingEnviron. Model. Softw., 96
S. Schneider (2001)
What is 'dangerous' climate change?Nature, 411
Marco Piñón (2020)
I OverviewThe Diaries and Letters of Lord Woolton 1940-1945
As they gain new users, climate change mitigation scenarios are playing an increasing role in transitions to net zero. One promising practice is the analysis of scenario ensembles. Here we argue that this practice has the potential to bring new and more robust insights compared with the use of single scenarios. However, several important aspects have to be addressed. We identify key methodological challenges and the existing methods and applications that have been or can be used to address these challenges within a three-step approach: (1) pre-processing the ensemble; (2) selecting a few scenarios or analysing the full ensemble; and (3) providing users with efficient access to the information.
Nature Climate Change – Springer Journals
Published: May 1, 2022
Read and print from thousands of top scholarly journals.
Already have an account? Log in
Bookmark this article. You can see your Bookmarks on your DeepDyve Library.
To save an article, log in first, or sign up for a DeepDyve account if you don’t already have one.
Copy and paste the desired citation format or use the link below to download a file formatted for EndNote
Access the full text.
Sign up today, get DeepDyve free for 14 days.
All DeepDyve websites use cookies to improve your online experience. They were placed on your computer when you launched this website. You can change your cookie settings through your browser.